微创手术与单纯内科治疗脑出血:MIND随机临床试验

IF 21.3 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Adam S Arthur, Babak S Jahromi, Paul S Saphier, Christopher M Nickele, Robert W Ryan, Peter Vajkoczy, Clemens M Schirmer, Christopher P Kellner, Charles C Matouk, Eric J Arias, Jamie S Ullman, Michael R Levitt, Ziad A Hage, David J Fiorella
{"title":"微创手术与单纯内科治疗脑出血:MIND随机临床试验","authors":"Adam S Arthur, Babak S Jahromi, Paul S Saphier, Christopher M Nickele, Robert W Ryan, Peter Vajkoczy, Clemens M Schirmer, Christopher P Kellner, Charles C Matouk, Eric J Arias, Jamie S Ullman, Michael R Levitt, Ziad A Hage, David J Fiorella","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>It remains uncertain whether surgical evacuation improves functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery with the Artemis Neuro Evacuation Device to guideline-based medical management alone for spontaneous supratentorial ICH.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The MIND open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial randomized patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH in a 2:1 ratio to either minimally invasive surgery or medical management alone. Participants were enrolled at 32 participating global sites between February 6, 2018, and August 28, 2023. This article reports on the primary trial outcome. Of 4066 eligible adult patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate- to large-volume supratentorial ICH (20-80 mL), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher, and Glasgow Coma Scale score between 5 and 15, 154 were randomized to minimally invasive surgery and 82 to medical management. Data were analyzed from February to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (within 72 hours of symptom onset) plus medical management or medical management alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary efficacy outcome was 180-day combined death and disability via ordinal modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The primary safety outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following an independent feasibility analysis prompted by the publication of positive results of a contemporaneous ICH trial, enrollment was stopped early at 236 participants. Overall median (IQR) participant age was 60 (50-70) years, 87 participants (36.9%) were female, 164 (69.5%) had primarily deep bleeds, and 72 (30.5%) had primarily lobar bleeds. Efficacy results of the primary model analysis suggested lack of evidence for the superiority of minimally invasive surgery over medical management (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 96% CI, 0.62-1.72; P = .45). The adjusted model's mean OR was also nonsignificantly greater than 1 (OR, 1.10; 96% CI, 0.66-1.85; P = .35). By 30 days, 11 participants (7.2%) in the surgery group and 8 (9.8%) in the medical management group died (difference, -2.5%; 95% CI, -11.7% to 4.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In the MIND randomized clinical trial, minimally invasive surgery within 72 hours did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality or improve 180-day disability in patients with supratentorial ICH compared to medical management alone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342664.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":21.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406146/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Medical Management Alone for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Adam S Arthur, Babak S Jahromi, Paul S Saphier, Christopher M Nickele, Robert W Ryan, Peter Vajkoczy, Clemens M Schirmer, Christopher P Kellner, Charles C Matouk, Eric J Arias, Jamie S Ullman, Michael R Levitt, Ziad A Hage, David J Fiorella\",\"doi\":\"10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>It remains uncertain whether surgical evacuation improves functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery with the Artemis Neuro Evacuation Device to guideline-based medical management alone for spontaneous supratentorial ICH.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>The MIND open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial randomized patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH in a 2:1 ratio to either minimally invasive surgery or medical management alone. Participants were enrolled at 32 participating global sites between February 6, 2018, and August 28, 2023. This article reports on the primary trial outcome. Of 4066 eligible adult patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate- to large-volume supratentorial ICH (20-80 mL), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher, and Glasgow Coma Scale score between 5 and 15, 154 were randomized to minimally invasive surgery and 82 to medical management. Data were analyzed from February to September 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Minimally invasive surgery (within 72 hours of symptom onset) plus medical management or medical management alone.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary efficacy outcome was 180-day combined death and disability via ordinal modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The primary safety outcome was 30-day mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following an independent feasibility analysis prompted by the publication of positive results of a contemporaneous ICH trial, enrollment was stopped early at 236 participants. Overall median (IQR) participant age was 60 (50-70) years, 87 participants (36.9%) were female, 164 (69.5%) had primarily deep bleeds, and 72 (30.5%) had primarily lobar bleeds. Efficacy results of the primary model analysis suggested lack of evidence for the superiority of minimally invasive surgery over medical management (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 96% CI, 0.62-1.72; P = .45). The adjusted model's mean OR was also nonsignificantly greater than 1 (OR, 1.10; 96% CI, 0.66-1.85; P = .35). By 30 days, 11 participants (7.2%) in the surgery group and 8 (9.8%) in the medical management group died (difference, -2.5%; 95% CI, -11.7% to 4.8%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In the MIND randomized clinical trial, minimally invasive surgery within 72 hours did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality or improve 180-day disability in patients with supratentorial ICH compared to medical management alone.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342664.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14677,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":21.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12406146/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JAMA neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3151\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2025.3151","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:手术引流是否能改善幕上脑出血(ICH)患者的功能结局仍不确定。目的:比较微创手术联合阿耳特弥斯神经疏散装置与单纯基于指南的药物治疗自发性幕上脑出血的安全性和有效性。设计、环境和参与者:MIND开放标签、多中心随机临床试验将自发性幕上脑出血患者按2:1的比例随机分配到微创手术或单纯药物治疗组。参与者在2018年2月6日至2023年8月28日期间在32个参与的全球站点注册。本文报道了主要试验结果。4066例符合条件的成人幕上脑出血(20- 80ml)患者(年龄18-80岁)中、大容量脑出血(20- 80ml),基线美国国立卫生研究院卒中量表评分为6分或更高,格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分在5 - 15分之间,其中154例随机接受微创手术,82例接受内科治疗。数据分析时间为2024年2月至9月。干预:微创手术(症状出现72小时内)加内科治疗或单独内科治疗。主要结局和测量指标:主要疗效结局为180天合并死亡和残疾,通过顺序修改的兰金量表评分(范围0[无症状]到6[死亡])。主要安全性指标为30天死亡率。结果:在发表了一项同期脑出血试验的阳性结果后,进行了独立的可行性分析,在236名受试者中提前停止了入组。总体中位(IQR)参与者年龄为60(50-70)岁,87名参与者(36.9%)为女性,164名参与者(69.5%)主要为深出血,72名参与者(30.5%)主要为大叶出血。初步模型分析的疗效结果显示,微创手术优于内科治疗的证据不足(优势比[OR], 1.03; 96% CI, 0.62-1.72; P = 0.45)。调整后模型的平均OR也无显著性大于1 (OR, 1.10; 96% CI, 0.66-1.85; P = 0.35)。30天,手术组11名(7.2%)患者死亡,医疗管理组8名(9.8%)患者死亡(差异为-2.5%;95% CI, -11.7%至4.8%)。结论和相关性:在MIND随机临床试验中,与单独治疗相比,在72小时内进行微创手术并没有显著降低幕上脑出血患者30天死亡率或改善180天残疾。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03342664。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Minimally Invasive Surgery vs Medical Management Alone for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: The MIND Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It remains uncertain whether surgical evacuation improves functional outcomes in patients with supratentorial intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH).

Objective: To compare the safety and efficacy of minimally invasive surgery with the Artemis Neuro Evacuation Device to guideline-based medical management alone for spontaneous supratentorial ICH.

Design, setting, and participants: The MIND open-label, multicenter randomized clinical trial randomized patients with spontaneous supratentorial ICH in a 2:1 ratio to either minimally invasive surgery or medical management alone. Participants were enrolled at 32 participating global sites between February 6, 2018, and August 28, 2023. This article reports on the primary trial outcome. Of 4066 eligible adult patients (aged 18-80 years) with moderate- to large-volume supratentorial ICH (20-80 mL), baseline National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 6 or higher, and Glasgow Coma Scale score between 5 and 15, 154 were randomized to minimally invasive surgery and 82 to medical management. Data were analyzed from February to September 2024.

Intervention: Minimally invasive surgery (within 72 hours of symptom onset) plus medical management or medical management alone.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary efficacy outcome was 180-day combined death and disability via ordinal modified Rankin Scale score (range, 0 [no symptoms] to 6 [death]). The primary safety outcome was 30-day mortality.

Results: Following an independent feasibility analysis prompted by the publication of positive results of a contemporaneous ICH trial, enrollment was stopped early at 236 participants. Overall median (IQR) participant age was 60 (50-70) years, 87 participants (36.9%) were female, 164 (69.5%) had primarily deep bleeds, and 72 (30.5%) had primarily lobar bleeds. Efficacy results of the primary model analysis suggested lack of evidence for the superiority of minimally invasive surgery over medical management (odds ratio [OR], 1.03; 96% CI, 0.62-1.72; P = .45). The adjusted model's mean OR was also nonsignificantly greater than 1 (OR, 1.10; 96% CI, 0.66-1.85; P = .35). By 30 days, 11 participants (7.2%) in the surgery group and 8 (9.8%) in the medical management group died (difference, -2.5%; 95% CI, -11.7% to 4.8%).

Conclusions and relevance: In the MIND randomized clinical trial, minimally invasive surgery within 72 hours did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality or improve 180-day disability in patients with supratentorial ICH compared to medical management alone.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03342664.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信