{"title":"2013-2021年中国成人肿瘤i期临床试验新药的风险和获益评估","authors":"Zhizhou Liang, Yu Yang, Yichen Zhang, Kexin Han, Huangqianyu Li, Luwen Shi, Xiaodong Guan","doi":"10.1007/s10637-025-01560-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research shows that the benefits of phase-I oncology trials increased from 5 to 18% between 2000 and 2019 globally. However, the risk-benefit profile of phase-I trials in China is unclear. This study aims to analyze the risk-benefit profile of phase-I oncology trials in China and explore their correlation. We included adult phase-I oncology trials registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and Information Disclosure Platform between September 2013 and December 2021. Data on response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, and CNKI to assess their correlation. A total of 189 trials with 9591 patients were analyzed. The median response rate was 25.4% (IQR, 9.4-41.4%), and the overall incidence of grade-3/4 adverse events was 29.3% (IQR, 15.0-43.8%). No significant trends were observed over time. Subgroup analysis showed higher response rates in lymphoma (45.8%), cell therapies (80.0%), and biomarker trials (38.0%). Higher adverse event rates were seen in breast cancer (55.0%), chemical drugs (33.3%), cytotoxic drugs (73.3%), and combination therapies (35.7%). A weak correlation was found between response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events (ρ = 0.217; p = 0.003), with a moderate correlation in immunotherapy (ρ = 0.417; p < 0.001). This is the first assessment of early efficacy and safety signals of phase-I oncology trials in China. No significant temporal trends were identified. However, the correlation in immunotherapy suggests that higher benefits may be accompanied by greater risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":14513,"journal":{"name":"Investigational New Drugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the risks and benefits of investigational new drugs in adult phase-I oncology trials in China, 2013-2021.\",\"authors\":\"Zhizhou Liang, Yu Yang, Yichen Zhang, Kexin Han, Huangqianyu Li, Luwen Shi, Xiaodong Guan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10637-025-01560-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Previous research shows that the benefits of phase-I oncology trials increased from 5 to 18% between 2000 and 2019 globally. However, the risk-benefit profile of phase-I trials in China is unclear. This study aims to analyze the risk-benefit profile of phase-I oncology trials in China and explore their correlation. We included adult phase-I oncology trials registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and Information Disclosure Platform between September 2013 and December 2021. Data on response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, and CNKI to assess their correlation. A total of 189 trials with 9591 patients were analyzed. The median response rate was 25.4% (IQR, 9.4-41.4%), and the overall incidence of grade-3/4 adverse events was 29.3% (IQR, 15.0-43.8%). No significant trends were observed over time. Subgroup analysis showed higher response rates in lymphoma (45.8%), cell therapies (80.0%), and biomarker trials (38.0%). Higher adverse event rates were seen in breast cancer (55.0%), chemical drugs (33.3%), cytotoxic drugs (73.3%), and combination therapies (35.7%). A weak correlation was found between response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events (ρ = 0.217; p = 0.003), with a moderate correlation in immunotherapy (ρ = 0.417; p < 0.001). This is the first assessment of early efficacy and safety signals of phase-I oncology trials in China. No significant temporal trends were identified. However, the correlation in immunotherapy suggests that higher benefits may be accompanied by greater risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Investigational New Drugs\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Investigational New Drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-025-01560-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Investigational New Drugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-025-01560-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
之前的研究表明,从2000年到2019年,全球i期肿瘤试验的收益从5%增加到18%。然而,中国i期临床试验的风险-收益情况尚不清楚。本研究旨在分析中国i期肿瘤临床试验的风险-收益概况,并探讨其相关性。我们纳入了2013年9月至2021年12月在中国临床试验注册和信息披露平台注册的成人i期肿瘤试验。从PubMed、谷歌Scholar和CNKI中检索缓解率和3/4级不良事件的数据,以评估其相关性。共分析了189项试验9591例患者。中位缓解率为25.4% (IQR, 9.4-41.4%), 3/4级不良事件总发生率为29.3% (IQR, 15.0-43.8%)。随着时间的推移,没有观察到明显的趋势。亚组分析显示,淋巴瘤(45.8%)、细胞治疗(80.0%)和生物标志物试验(38.0%)的有效率更高。不良事件发生率较高的是乳腺癌(55.0%)、化学药物(33.3%)、细胞毒药物(73.3%)和联合治疗(35.7%)。缓解率与3/4级不良事件之间存在弱相关性(ρ = 0.217; p = 0.003),免疫治疗中存在中度相关性(ρ = 0.417; p = 0.003)
Assessing the risks and benefits of investigational new drugs in adult phase-I oncology trials in China, 2013-2021.
Previous research shows that the benefits of phase-I oncology trials increased from 5 to 18% between 2000 and 2019 globally. However, the risk-benefit profile of phase-I trials in China is unclear. This study aims to analyze the risk-benefit profile of phase-I oncology trials in China and explore their correlation. We included adult phase-I oncology trials registered on the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry and Information Disclosure Platform between September 2013 and December 2021. Data on response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events were retrieved from PubMed, Google Scholar, and CNKI to assess their correlation. A total of 189 trials with 9591 patients were analyzed. The median response rate was 25.4% (IQR, 9.4-41.4%), and the overall incidence of grade-3/4 adverse events was 29.3% (IQR, 15.0-43.8%). No significant trends were observed over time. Subgroup analysis showed higher response rates in lymphoma (45.8%), cell therapies (80.0%), and biomarker trials (38.0%). Higher adverse event rates were seen in breast cancer (55.0%), chemical drugs (33.3%), cytotoxic drugs (73.3%), and combination therapies (35.7%). A weak correlation was found between response rates and grade-3/4 adverse events (ρ = 0.217; p = 0.003), with a moderate correlation in immunotherapy (ρ = 0.417; p < 0.001). This is the first assessment of early efficacy and safety signals of phase-I oncology trials in China. No significant temporal trends were identified. However, the correlation in immunotherapy suggests that higher benefits may be accompanied by greater risks.
期刊介绍:
The development of new anticancer agents is one of the most rapidly changing aspects of cancer research. Investigational New Drugs provides a forum for the rapid dissemination of information on new anticancer agents. The papers published are of interest to the medical chemist, toxicologist, pharmacist, pharmacologist, biostatistician and clinical oncologist. Investigational New Drugs provides the fastest possible publication of new discoveries and results for the whole community of scientists developing anticancer agents.