CYP2C19与氯吡格雷二级预防重大缺血事件作用的相互作用:系统回顾和meta分析。

IF 8.7 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Femke Cc Kremers, Jochem van den Biggelaar, Hester F Lingsma, Ron Hn van Schaik, Bob Roozenbeek, Diederik Wj Dippel
{"title":"CYP2C19与氯吡格雷二级预防重大缺血事件作用的相互作用:系统回顾和meta分析。","authors":"Femke Cc Kremers, Jochem van den Biggelaar, Hester F Lingsma, Ron Hn van Schaik, Bob Roozenbeek, Diederik Wj Dippel","doi":"10.1177/17474930251372371","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Clopidogrel may be a less effective antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after cardiovascular events in carriers of the CYP2C19 Loss of Function (LoF) allele. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clopidogrel in patients with known CYP2C19 carrier status have provided inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aims to pool evidence on the effect of different antiplatelet strategies on outcomes according to CYP2C19 LoF status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the interaction of CYP2C19 LoF allele on clopidogrel versus placebo or other antiplatelet agents in patients with cardiovascular disease or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including ischemic stroke, with major bleeding events assessed as a safety outcome. Random effects analysis estimated pooled odds ratios for LoF carriers and non-carriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs with 35,189 participants in total were included. When all interaction effects are pooled, the occurrence of MACE was 1.29 times higher in LoF variant carriers compared to non-carriers for clopidogrel treatment (p-interaction = 0.01). Risk of MACE was 1.20 times higher in LoF carriers compared to non-carriers when clopidogrel was compared to placebo (p-interaction = 0.13). In TIA or minor stroke patients, the interaction effect was 1.63 times larger (p-interaction = 0.02). Clopidogrel was less effective than prasugrel for MACE occurrence (1.57 times higher, p-interaction = 0.02) and ticagrelor (1.21 times higher, p-interaction = 0.19) in CYP2C19 LoF variant carriers. Bleeding outcomes were similar across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clopidogrel is less effective in patients with CYP2C19 LoF genotype and cardiovascular disease, minor stroke, or TIA. The size and direction of the interaction warrant further research into the role of LoF genotypes and the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing. Prasugrel may be a more effective alternative for CYP2C19 LoF carriers.Registration-URL:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021242993.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251372371"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interaction of CYP2C19 with the effect of clopidogrel in secondary prevention of major ischemic events: Systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Femke Cc Kremers, Jochem van den Biggelaar, Hester F Lingsma, Ron Hn van Schaik, Bob Roozenbeek, Diederik Wj Dippel\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17474930251372371\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Clopidogrel may be a less effective antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after cardiovascular events in carriers of the CYP2C19 Loss of Function (LoF) allele. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clopidogrel in patients with known CYP2C19 carrier status have provided inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aims to pool evidence on the effect of different antiplatelet strategies on outcomes according to CYP2C19 LoF status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the interaction of CYP2C19 LoF allele on clopidogrel versus placebo or other antiplatelet agents in patients with cardiovascular disease or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including ischemic stroke, with major bleeding events assessed as a safety outcome. Random effects analysis estimated pooled odds ratios for LoF carriers and non-carriers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifteen RCTs with 35,189 participants in total were included. When all interaction effects are pooled, the occurrence of MACE was 1.29 times higher in LoF variant carriers compared to non-carriers for clopidogrel treatment (p-interaction = 0.01). Risk of MACE was 1.20 times higher in LoF carriers compared to non-carriers when clopidogrel was compared to placebo (p-interaction = 0.13). In TIA or minor stroke patients, the interaction effect was 1.63 times larger (p-interaction = 0.02). Clopidogrel was less effective than prasugrel for MACE occurrence (1.57 times higher, p-interaction = 0.02) and ticagrelor (1.21 times higher, p-interaction = 0.19) in CYP2C19 LoF variant carriers. Bleeding outcomes were similar across groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Clopidogrel is less effective in patients with CYP2C19 LoF genotype and cardiovascular disease, minor stroke, or TIA. The size and direction of the interaction warrant further research into the role of LoF genotypes and the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing. Prasugrel may be a more effective alternative for CYP2C19 LoF carriers.Registration-URL:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021242993.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17474930251372371\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251372371\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251372371","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:对于CYP2C19功能丧失(LoF)等位基因携带者的心血管事件二级预防,氯吡格雷可能是一种效果较差的抗血小板药物。氯吡格雷在已知CYP2C19携带者中的随机对照试验(RCTs)结果不一致。本荟萃分析旨在根据CYP2C19 LoF状态收集不同抗血小板策略对预后影响的证据。方法:我们对随机对照试验进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,以评估CYP2C19 LoF等位基因对氯吡格雷与安慰剂或其他抗血小板药物在心血管疾病、TIA或缺血性卒中患者中的相互作用。主要结局是主要不良心血管事件(MACE),包括缺血性卒中,主要出血事件被评估为安全结局。随机效应分析估计了LoF携带者和非携带者的合并优势比。结果:共纳入15项随机对照试验,共35189名受试者。当综合所有相互作用效应时,氯吡格雷治疗中LoF变异携带者的MACE发生率比非携带者高1.29倍(p-相互作用=0.01)。当氯吡格雷与安慰剂比较时,LoF携带者发生MACE的风险是非携带者的1.20倍(p相互作用=0.13)。在TIA或轻微脑卒中患者中,交互作用效应是前者的1.63倍(p-交互作用=0.02)。在CYP2C19 LoF变异携带者中,氯吡格雷的MACE发生率低于普格雷(1.57倍,p-互作=0.02)和替格瑞洛(1.21倍,p-互作=0.19)。各组间出血结果相似。结论:氯吡格雷对CYP2C19 LoF基因型、心血管疾病、轻微脑卒中或TIA患者疗效较差。这种相互作用的规模和方向值得进一步研究LoF基因型的作用和基因检测的成本效益。普拉格雷可能是CYP2C19 LoF携带者更有效的替代药物。注册-网址:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/;唯一标识符:CRD42021242993。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interaction of CYP2C19 with the effect of clopidogrel in secondary prevention of major ischemic events: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background and aims: Clopidogrel may be a less effective antiplatelet agent for secondary prevention after cardiovascular events in carriers of the CYP2C19 Loss of Function (LoF) allele. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of clopidogrel in patients with known CYP2C19 carrier status have provided inconsistent results. This meta-analysis aims to pool evidence on the effect of different antiplatelet strategies on outcomes according to CYP2C19 LoF status.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs to evaluate the interaction of CYP2C19 LoF allele on clopidogrel versus placebo or other antiplatelet agents in patients with cardiovascular disease or transient ischemic attack (TIA) or ischemic stroke. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) including ischemic stroke, with major bleeding events assessed as a safety outcome. Random effects analysis estimated pooled odds ratios for LoF carriers and non-carriers.

Results: Fifteen RCTs with 35,189 participants in total were included. When all interaction effects are pooled, the occurrence of MACE was 1.29 times higher in LoF variant carriers compared to non-carriers for clopidogrel treatment (p-interaction = 0.01). Risk of MACE was 1.20 times higher in LoF carriers compared to non-carriers when clopidogrel was compared to placebo (p-interaction = 0.13). In TIA or minor stroke patients, the interaction effect was 1.63 times larger (p-interaction = 0.02). Clopidogrel was less effective than prasugrel for MACE occurrence (1.57 times higher, p-interaction = 0.02) and ticagrelor (1.21 times higher, p-interaction = 0.19) in CYP2C19 LoF variant carriers. Bleeding outcomes were similar across groups.

Conclusion: Clopidogrel is less effective in patients with CYP2C19 LoF genotype and cardiovascular disease, minor stroke, or TIA. The size and direction of the interaction warrant further research into the role of LoF genotypes and the cost-effectiveness of genetic testing. Prasugrel may be a more effective alternative for CYP2C19 LoF carriers.Registration-URL:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/; Unique identifier: CRD42021242993.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信