Alicia Shin, Seonyoung Kang, Jinhyung Jung, In Young Cho, Kyungdo Han, Seonghye Kim, Se Yun Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hyungjin Kim
{"title":"类风湿关节炎与中风的血清学状态和中风亚型之间的关系。","authors":"Alicia Shin, Seonyoung Kang, Jinhyung Jung, In Young Cho, Kyungdo Han, Seonghye Kim, Se Yun Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hyungjin Kim","doi":"10.1177/17474930251377174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with an increased stroke risk, but associations by serostatus (seropositive RA (SPRA) vs seronegative RA (SNRA)) and with subtypes of stroke (ischemic stroke (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke (HS)) are not well established. In addition, it is not well-known whether the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are associated with altered stroke risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide cohort study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and included participants who were first diagnosed with RA in the period 2010-2017 with no previous history of stroke, and who had a health checkup within 2 years before the index date (45,175 RA patients). They were compared (1:3 ratio) with non-RA controls matched by age and sex (135,525 non-RA controls).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with RA had a significantly higher risk of both IS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-1.58) and HS (aHR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.15-1.50) compared to controls. SPRA patients showed higher risk for both IS (aHR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.43-1.69 SPRA vs aHR = 1.23, 1.08-1.41 SNRA) and HS (aHR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.21-1.62 SPRA vs aHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.86-1.38 SNRA). No difference in stroke risk was observed between bDMARDs users and non-users (aHR = 1.66 for users, aHR = 1.41 for non-users). However, potential differences were noted with tsDMARDs use (aHR = 0.81 for users vs aHR = 1.43 for non-users), although not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with RA are at significantly greater risk for both IS and HS compared to those without RA, and SPRA patients showed higher risk than SNRA patients. Further studies are required to determine the potential of tsDMARDs in the prevention of stroke in RA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930251377174"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The association between rheumatoid arthritis and stroke risk by serologic status and stroke subtypes.\",\"authors\":\"Alicia Shin, Seonyoung Kang, Jinhyung Jung, In Young Cho, Kyungdo Han, Seonghye Kim, Se Yun Kim, Dong Wook Shin, Hyungjin Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/17474930251377174\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with an increased stroke risk, but associations by serostatus (seropositive RA (SPRA) vs seronegative RA (SNRA)) and with subtypes of stroke (ischemic stroke (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke (HS)) are not well established. In addition, it is not well-known whether the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are associated with altered stroke risk.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This nationwide cohort study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and included participants who were first diagnosed with RA in the period 2010-2017 with no previous history of stroke, and who had a health checkup within 2 years before the index date (45,175 RA patients). They were compared (1:3 ratio) with non-RA controls matched by age and sex (135,525 non-RA controls).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients with RA had a significantly higher risk of both IS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-1.58) and HS (aHR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.15-1.50) compared to controls. SPRA patients showed higher risk for both IS (aHR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.43-1.69 SPRA vs aHR = 1.23, 1.08-1.41 SNRA) and HS (aHR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.21-1.62 SPRA vs aHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.86-1.38 SNRA). No difference in stroke risk was observed between bDMARDs users and non-users (aHR = 1.66 for users, aHR = 1.41 for non-users). However, potential differences were noted with tsDMARDs use (aHR = 0.81 for users vs aHR = 1.43 for non-users), although not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients with RA are at significantly greater risk for both IS and HS compared to those without RA, and SPRA patients showed higher risk than SNRA patients. Further studies are required to determine the potential of tsDMARDs in the prevention of stroke in RA.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"17474930251377174\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Stroke\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251377174\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930251377174","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:类风湿性关节炎(RA)与卒中风险增加有关,但血清状态(血清阳性RA (SPRA) vs.血清阴性RA (SNRA))和卒中亚型(缺血性卒中(IS)或出血性卒中(HS))之间的关联尚未得到很好的证实。此外,目前尚不清楚使用生物和靶向合成疾病修饰抗风湿药物(b/tsDMARDs)是否与卒中风险的改变有关。方法:这项全国性队列研究使用了韩国国民健康保险服务数据库,纳入了2010-2017年首次诊断为RA的参与者,既往无卒中史,并在索引日期前2年内进行了健康检查(45175例RA患者)。将他们与按年龄和性别匹配的非ra对照组(135,525名非ra对照组)(1:3比例)进行比较。结果:与对照组相比,RA患者发生IS (aHR 1.47, 95% CI 1.36-1.58)和HS (aHR 1.31, 95% CI 1.15-1.50)的风险明显更高。SPRA患者出现IS (aHR 1.56, 95% CI 1.43-1.69, SPRA vs. aHR 1.23, 1.08-1.41 SNRA)和HS (aHR 1.40, 95% CI 1.21-1.62, SPRA vs. aHR 1.09, 95% CI 0.86-1.38 SNRA)的风险更高。bDMARDs使用者与非使用者之间卒中风险无差异(使用者aHR为1.66,非使用者aHR为1.41)。然而,tsdmard使用的潜在差异被注意到(使用tsdmard的aHR为0.81,非使用tsdmard的aHR为1.43),尽管没有统计学意义。结论:RA患者发生IS和HS的风险均高于无RA患者,且SPRA患者发生HS的风险高于SNRA患者。需要进一步的研究来确定tsDMARDs在类风湿关节炎中预防卒中的潜力。
The association between rheumatoid arthritis and stroke risk by serologic status and stroke subtypes.
Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has been associated with an increased stroke risk, but associations by serostatus (seropositive RA (SPRA) vs seronegative RA (SNRA)) and with subtypes of stroke (ischemic stroke (IS) or hemorrhagic stroke (HS)) are not well established. In addition, it is not well-known whether the use of biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) are associated with altered stroke risk.
Methods: This nationwide cohort study used the Korean National Health Insurance Service database and included participants who were first diagnosed with RA in the period 2010-2017 with no previous history of stroke, and who had a health checkup within 2 years before the index date (45,175 RA patients). They were compared (1:3 ratio) with non-RA controls matched by age and sex (135,525 non-RA controls).
Results: Patients with RA had a significantly higher risk of both IS (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.47, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.36-1.58) and HS (aHR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.15-1.50) compared to controls. SPRA patients showed higher risk for both IS (aHR = 1.56, 95% CI = 1.43-1.69 SPRA vs aHR = 1.23, 1.08-1.41 SNRA) and HS (aHR = 1.40, 95% CI = 1.21-1.62 SPRA vs aHR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.86-1.38 SNRA). No difference in stroke risk was observed between bDMARDs users and non-users (aHR = 1.66 for users, aHR = 1.41 for non-users). However, potential differences were noted with tsDMARDs use (aHR = 0.81 for users vs aHR = 1.43 for non-users), although not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Patients with RA are at significantly greater risk for both IS and HS compared to those without RA, and SPRA patients showed higher risk than SNRA patients. Further studies are required to determine the potential of tsDMARDs in the prevention of stroke in RA.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.