{"title":"临床IV期胃癌转化手术后化疗:倾向评分匹配分析。","authors":"Yasunori Masuike, Takeshi Omori, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Yuki Ushimaru, Kei Yamamoto, Takashi Kanemura, Takahito Sugase, Norihiro Matsuura, Ryota Mori, Masatoshi Kitakaze, Masahiko Kubo, Yasunari Fukuda, Hisateru Komatsu, Masaaki Miyo, Toshinori Sueda, Yoshinori Kagawa, Kunihito Goto, Shogo Kobayashi, Masayuki Ohue, Hiroshi Miyata","doi":"10.1007/s10147-025-02867-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversion surgery following systemic chemotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for clinical stage IV gastric cancer. However, the role of postoperative chemotherapy in improving survival outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative chemotherapy on survival, comparing single-agent and combination regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent gastrectomy after induction chemotherapy for clinical stage IV gastric cancer between 2007 and 2021. Patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy were categorized into single-agent and combination therapy groups. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Propensity score matching was applied to minimize selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 128 eligible patients, 45 (35.2%) received single-agent chemotherapy, while 83 (64.8%) received combination therapy. After propensity score matching, 70 patients (35 in each group) were analyzed. The median OS was 29 months, and the median PFS was 14 months, with no significant differences between single-agent and combination chemotherapy groups (OS: p = 0.841; PFS: p = 0.831). Residual tumor was a strong predictor of poor survival (p = 0.010). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential PFS benefit of combination therapy in ypStage IV patients without residual tumor (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative combination chemotherapy did not significantly improve survival outcomes compared with single-agent regimen in the overall cohort. However, specific subgroups, particularly ypStage IV patients without residual tumor, may benefit from intensified therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postoperative chemotherapy after conversion surgery for clinical stage IV gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yasunori Masuike, Takeshi Omori, Kazuyoshi Yamamoto, Yoshitomo Yanagimoto, Yuki Ushimaru, Kei Yamamoto, Takashi Kanemura, Takahito Sugase, Norihiro Matsuura, Ryota Mori, Masatoshi Kitakaze, Masahiko Kubo, Yasunari Fukuda, Hisateru Komatsu, Masaaki Miyo, Toshinori Sueda, Yoshinori Kagawa, Kunihito Goto, Shogo Kobayashi, Masayuki Ohue, Hiroshi Miyata\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10147-025-02867-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Conversion surgery following systemic chemotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for clinical stage IV gastric cancer. However, the role of postoperative chemotherapy in improving survival outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative chemotherapy on survival, comparing single-agent and combination regimens.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent gastrectomy after induction chemotherapy for clinical stage IV gastric cancer between 2007 and 2021. Patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy were categorized into single-agent and combination therapy groups. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Propensity score matching was applied to minimize selection bias.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 128 eligible patients, 45 (35.2%) received single-agent chemotherapy, while 83 (64.8%) received combination therapy. After propensity score matching, 70 patients (35 in each group) were analyzed. The median OS was 29 months, and the median PFS was 14 months, with no significant differences between single-agent and combination chemotherapy groups (OS: p = 0.841; PFS: p = 0.831). Residual tumor was a strong predictor of poor survival (p = 0.010). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential PFS benefit of combination therapy in ypStage IV patients without residual tumor (p = 0.04).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Postoperative combination chemotherapy did not significantly improve survival outcomes compared with single-agent regimen in the overall cohort. However, specific subgroups, particularly ypStage IV patients without residual tumor, may benefit from intensified therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13869,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02867-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-025-02867-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:全身化疗后的转化手术已成为临床IV期胃癌的一种很有前景的治疗策略。然而,术后化疗在改善生存结果中的作用尚不清楚。本研究旨在评估术后化疗对生存的影响,比较单药和联合化疗方案。方法:我们对2007年至2021年间临床IV期胃癌诱导化疗后行胃切除术的患者进行了单机构回顾性研究。术后化疗患者分为单药组和联合治疗组。采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox比例风险模型分析总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)。倾向评分匹配用于最小化选择偏差。结果:128例符合条件的患者中,45例(35.2%)接受单药化疗,83例(64.8%)接受联合化疗。倾向评分匹配后,对70例患者(每组35例)进行分析。中位OS为29个月,中位PFS为14个月,单药组与联合化疗组无显著差异(OS: p = 0.841; PFS: p = 0.831)。残余肿瘤是不良生存的重要预测因子(p = 0.010)。亚组分析显示,联合治疗对无残留肿瘤的ypiv期患者有潜在的PFS益处(p = 0.04)。结论:在整个队列中,与单药方案相比,术后联合化疗没有显著改善生存结果。然而,特定的亚组,特别是没有残留肿瘤的IV期患者,可能从强化治疗中受益。
Postoperative chemotherapy after conversion surgery for clinical stage IV gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis.
Background: Conversion surgery following systemic chemotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy for clinical stage IV gastric cancer. However, the role of postoperative chemotherapy in improving survival outcomes remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of postoperative chemotherapy on survival, comparing single-agent and combination regimens.
Methods: We conducted a single-institution retrospective study of patients who underwent gastrectomy after induction chemotherapy for clinical stage IV gastric cancer between 2007 and 2021. Patients receiving postoperative chemotherapy were categorized into single-agent and combination therapy groups. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazard models. Propensity score matching was applied to minimize selection bias.
Results: Among 128 eligible patients, 45 (35.2%) received single-agent chemotherapy, while 83 (64.8%) received combination therapy. After propensity score matching, 70 patients (35 in each group) were analyzed. The median OS was 29 months, and the median PFS was 14 months, with no significant differences between single-agent and combination chemotherapy groups (OS: p = 0.841; PFS: p = 0.831). Residual tumor was a strong predictor of poor survival (p = 0.010). Subgroup analysis suggested a potential PFS benefit of combination therapy in ypStage IV patients without residual tumor (p = 0.04).
Conclusion: Postoperative combination chemotherapy did not significantly improve survival outcomes compared with single-agent regimen in the overall cohort. However, specific subgroups, particularly ypStage IV patients without residual tumor, may benefit from intensified therapy.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.