HFpEF和HFmrEF在急性失代偿性心力衰竭中的作用:孤立的舒张功能障碍还是其他心脏病理?

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Maria Giulia Bellicini
{"title":"HFpEF和HFmrEF在急性失代偿性心力衰竭中的作用:孤立的舒张功能障碍还是其他心脏病理?","authors":"Maria Giulia Bellicini","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04097-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>A significant proportion of acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalizations involve patients with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFmrEF). According to the current Guidelines, these HF phenotypes exclude patients with major cardiac pathologies, such as severe valvular disease, cardiomyopathies, or isolated precapillary pulmonary artery hypertension, and their aetiology is attributed to diastolic dysfunction alone. However, whether HFpEF or HFmrEF-when defined in this way-can independently cause fluid overload remains unproved. We retrospectively analyzed 773 consecutive cardiology admissions for AHF between January 2022 and November 2023. Of these, 323 patients presented with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40% were included. Systemic venous congestion was defined as an inferior vena cava diameter > 21 mm with reduced inspiratory collapse. A structured diagnostic approach was used to identify the prevalence of major cardiac structural abnormalites and rhythm abnormalities, classified as HFpEF mimics, in patients with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF and peripheral congestion. Among 323 patients with LVEF>40%, 252 (78%) showed systemic congestion. Of these, 206 (81.7%) had severe valvular dysfunction, 26 (10.3%) had other relevant structural or rhythmic cardiac pathology (such as cardiomyopathy) or had V stage renal failure, and only 20 patients (8%) had no identifiable HFpEF mimic, thereby fulfilling the strict guideline-based definition of these entities. In patients with LVEF >40%, systemic venous congestion was almost invariably associated with significant structural or rhytm heart disease or advanced renal failure. Cases without such alternative explanations were extremely rare, suggesting that guideline-defined HFpEF/HFmrEF, as an independent cause of acute decompensation, may represent an uncommon or even non-existent clinical entity. These findings challenge the validity of current definitions and support a more comprehensive diagnostic approach in this patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"HFpEF and HFmrEF in acute heart failure: isolated diastolic dysfunction or alternative cardiac pathologies?\",\"authors\":\"Maria Giulia Bellicini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04097-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>A significant proportion of acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalizations involve patients with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFmrEF). According to the current Guidelines, these HF phenotypes exclude patients with major cardiac pathologies, such as severe valvular disease, cardiomyopathies, or isolated precapillary pulmonary artery hypertension, and their aetiology is attributed to diastolic dysfunction alone. However, whether HFpEF or HFmrEF-when defined in this way-can independently cause fluid overload remains unproved. We retrospectively analyzed 773 consecutive cardiology admissions for AHF between January 2022 and November 2023. Of these, 323 patients presented with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40% were included. Systemic venous congestion was defined as an inferior vena cava diameter > 21 mm with reduced inspiratory collapse. A structured diagnostic approach was used to identify the prevalence of major cardiac structural abnormalites and rhythm abnormalities, classified as HFpEF mimics, in patients with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF and peripheral congestion. Among 323 patients with LVEF>40%, 252 (78%) showed systemic congestion. Of these, 206 (81.7%) had severe valvular dysfunction, 26 (10.3%) had other relevant structural or rhythmic cardiac pathology (such as cardiomyopathy) or had V stage renal failure, and only 20 patients (8%) had no identifiable HFpEF mimic, thereby fulfilling the strict guideline-based definition of these entities. In patients with LVEF >40%, systemic venous congestion was almost invariably associated with significant structural or rhytm heart disease or advanced renal failure. Cases without such alternative explanations were extremely rare, suggesting that guideline-defined HFpEF/HFmrEF, as an independent cause of acute decompensation, may represent an uncommon or even non-existent clinical entity. These findings challenge the validity of current definitions and support a more comprehensive diagnostic approach in this patient population.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04097-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04097-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在急性心力衰竭(AHF)住院的患者中,有很大一部分是射血分数(HFpEF或HFmrEF)保持不变或轻度降低的心力衰竭患者。根据目前的指南,这些HF表型排除了有主要心脏病变的患者,如严重瓣膜病、心肌病或孤立性毛细血管前肺动脉高压,其病因仅归因于舒张功能障碍。然而,HFpEF或hfmref(以这种方式定义)是否会独立导致流体过载仍未得到证实。我们回顾性分析了2022年1月至2023年11月期间因AHF入院的773例心脏病患者。其中,323例左室射血分数(LVEF)低于40%。全身性静脉充血定义为下腔静脉直径bbbb21 mm,吸气性塌陷减少。结构化诊断方法用于确定主要心脏结构异常和心律异常的患病率,归类为HFpEF模拟,在LVEF保留或轻度减少和周围充血的患者中。323例LVEF患者(40%)中,252例(78%)出现全身性充血。其中,206例(81.7%)有严重的瓣膜功能障碍,26例(10.3%)有其他相关的结构性或节律性心脏病理(如心肌病)或V期肾功能衰竭,只有20例(8%)没有可识别的HFpEF模拟物,从而符合严格的基于指南的定义。在LVEF bb0 40%的患者中,全身静脉充血几乎总是与明显的结构性或节律性心脏病或晚期肾衰竭相关。没有这种替代解释的病例极为罕见,这表明指南定义的HFpEF/HFmrEF作为急性失代偿的独立原因,可能是一种不常见甚至不存在的临床实体。这些发现挑战了当前定义的有效性,并支持在该患者群体中采用更全面的诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
HFpEF and HFmrEF in acute heart failure: isolated diastolic dysfunction or alternative cardiac pathologies?

A significant proportion of acute heart failure (AHF) hospitalizations involve patients with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF or HFmrEF). According to the current Guidelines, these HF phenotypes exclude patients with major cardiac pathologies, such as severe valvular disease, cardiomyopathies, or isolated precapillary pulmonary artery hypertension, and their aetiology is attributed to diastolic dysfunction alone. However, whether HFpEF or HFmrEF-when defined in this way-can independently cause fluid overload remains unproved. We retrospectively analyzed 773 consecutive cardiology admissions for AHF between January 2022 and November 2023. Of these, 323 patients presented with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 40% were included. Systemic venous congestion was defined as an inferior vena cava diameter > 21 mm with reduced inspiratory collapse. A structured diagnostic approach was used to identify the prevalence of major cardiac structural abnormalites and rhythm abnormalities, classified as HFpEF mimics, in patients with preserved or mildly reduced LVEF and peripheral congestion. Among 323 patients with LVEF>40%, 252 (78%) showed systemic congestion. Of these, 206 (81.7%) had severe valvular dysfunction, 26 (10.3%) had other relevant structural or rhythmic cardiac pathology (such as cardiomyopathy) or had V stage renal failure, and only 20 patients (8%) had no identifiable HFpEF mimic, thereby fulfilling the strict guideline-based definition of these entities. In patients with LVEF >40%, systemic venous congestion was almost invariably associated with significant structural or rhytm heart disease or advanced renal failure. Cases without such alternative explanations were extremely rare, suggesting that guideline-defined HFpEF/HFmrEF, as an independent cause of acute decompensation, may represent an uncommon or even non-existent clinical entity. These findings challenge the validity of current definitions and support a more comprehensive diagnostic approach in this patient population.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信