速度时间积分在预测中危肺栓塞患者住院预后中的预测准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 3.8 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gunaseelan Rajendran, Sasikumar Mahalingam, Anitha Ramkumar, Ezhilkugan Ganessane, Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy, P T Kumaresh, Vijayanthi Vijayan, Rajkumar Elanjaeran, K Aswin
{"title":"速度时间积分在预测中危肺栓塞患者住院预后中的预测准确性:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Gunaseelan Rajendran, Sasikumar Mahalingam, Anitha Ramkumar, Ezhilkugan Ganessane, Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy, P T Kumaresh, Vijayanthi Vijayan, Rajkumar Elanjaeran, K Aswin","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04089-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (IRPE) is a critical clinical entity with significant mortality risk due to normotensive shock, a condition marked by low cardiac index despite maintained blood pressure. Accurate and timely detection of hemodynamic compromise in IRPE remains a challenge. Velocity Time Integral (VTI), a Doppler echocardiographic parameter, has emerged as a potential non-invasive tool for predicting hospital outcomes, but the evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of VTI in this context. A systematic literature search encompassing PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS Databases was conducted from inception till December 2024. Studies assessing VTI's diagnostic accuracy for predicting hospital outcomes in IRPE were included. A bivariate random-effects model was used to pool sensitivity and specificity, with heterogeneity analyzed via I<sup>2</sup> statistics and meta-regression. Literature search yielded 9 studies with 2038 patients. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of VTI for predicting hospital outcomes in IRPE were 79% (95% CI 69-86%) and 81% (95% CI 70-88%), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio was 15.58 (95% CI: 7.42-32.69). Heterogeneity was moderate to high (I<sup>2</sup> = 66.59%), with specificity showing greater variability. Meta-regression identified study-level characteristics, including risk of bias and VTI measurement site (LVOT vs. RVOT), as sources of variability. VTI demonstrates moderate sensitivity and specificity in predicting hospital outcomes such as mortality, in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability or the need for reperfusion therapy.  VTI, offers a non-invasive, real-time diagnostic option. However, study heterogeneity and methodological limitations highlight the need for further research.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Predictive accuracy of velocity time integral in predicting in-hospital outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Gunaseelan Rajendran, Sasikumar Mahalingam, Anitha Ramkumar, Ezhilkugan Ganessane, Yuvaraj Krishnamoorthy, P T Kumaresh, Vijayanthi Vijayan, Rajkumar Elanjaeran, K Aswin\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11739-025-04089-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (IRPE) is a critical clinical entity with significant mortality risk due to normotensive shock, a condition marked by low cardiac index despite maintained blood pressure. Accurate and timely detection of hemodynamic compromise in IRPE remains a challenge. Velocity Time Integral (VTI), a Doppler echocardiographic parameter, has emerged as a potential non-invasive tool for predicting hospital outcomes, but the evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of VTI in this context. A systematic literature search encompassing PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS Databases was conducted from inception till December 2024. Studies assessing VTI's diagnostic accuracy for predicting hospital outcomes in IRPE were included. A bivariate random-effects model was used to pool sensitivity and specificity, with heterogeneity analyzed via I<sup>2</sup> statistics and meta-regression. Literature search yielded 9 studies with 2038 patients. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of VTI for predicting hospital outcomes in IRPE were 79% (95% CI 69-86%) and 81% (95% CI 70-88%), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio was 15.58 (95% CI: 7.42-32.69). Heterogeneity was moderate to high (I<sup>2</sup> = 66.59%), with specificity showing greater variability. Meta-regression identified study-level characteristics, including risk of bias and VTI measurement site (LVOT vs. RVOT), as sources of variability. VTI demonstrates moderate sensitivity and specificity in predicting hospital outcomes such as mortality, in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability or the need for reperfusion therapy.  VTI, offers a non-invasive, real-time diagnostic option. However, study heterogeneity and methodological limitations highlight the need for further research.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal and Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04089-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04089-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中危性肺栓塞(IRPE)是一种重要的临床疾病,由于血压正常休克而具有显著的死亡风险,其特征是血压维持在低位,但心脏指数较低。准确和及时地检测IRPE的血流动力学损害仍然是一个挑战。速度时间积分(VTI)是一种多普勒超声心动图参数,已成为预测医院预后的潜在非侵入性工具,但证据仍然不完整。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估VTI在这种情况下的诊断准确性。系统的文献检索包括PubMed, EMBASE和SCOPUS数据库,从成立到2024年12月。评估VTI在预测IRPE医院预后方面的诊断准确性的研究被纳入。采用双变量随机效应模型合并敏感性和特异性,并通过I2统计和meta回归分析异质性。文献检索得到9项研究,共2038例患者。VTI预测IRPE医院预后的总敏感性和特异性分别为79% (95% CI 69-86%)和81% (95% CI 70-88%)。诊断优势比为15.58 (95% CI: 7.42-32.69)。异质性为中高(I2 = 66.59%),特异性表现出较大的变异性。meta回归确定了研究水平的特征,包括偏倚风险和VTI测量地点(LVOT vs. RVOT),作为变异性的来源。VTI在预测医院预后(如死亡率、院内死亡率、复苏后的心脏骤停、血流动力学不稳定或需要再灌注治疗)方面具有中等的敏感性和特异性。VTI提供了一种非侵入性的实时诊断选择。然而,研究的异质性和方法的局限性突出了进一步研究的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Predictive accuracy of velocity time integral in predicting in-hospital outcomes in patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Intermediate-risk pulmonary embolism (IRPE) is a critical clinical entity with significant mortality risk due to normotensive shock, a condition marked by low cardiac index despite maintained blood pressure. Accurate and timely detection of hemodynamic compromise in IRPE remains a challenge. Velocity Time Integral (VTI), a Doppler echocardiographic parameter, has emerged as a potential non-invasive tool for predicting hospital outcomes, but the evidence remains fragmented. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of VTI in this context. A systematic literature search encompassing PubMed, EMBASE, and SCOPUS Databases was conducted from inception till December 2024. Studies assessing VTI's diagnostic accuracy for predicting hospital outcomes in IRPE were included. A bivariate random-effects model was used to pool sensitivity and specificity, with heterogeneity analyzed via I2 statistics and meta-regression. Literature search yielded 9 studies with 2038 patients. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of VTI for predicting hospital outcomes in IRPE were 79% (95% CI 69-86%) and 81% (95% CI 70-88%), respectively. Diagnostic odds ratio was 15.58 (95% CI: 7.42-32.69). Heterogeneity was moderate to high (I2 = 66.59%), with specificity showing greater variability. Meta-regression identified study-level characteristics, including risk of bias and VTI measurement site (LVOT vs. RVOT), as sources of variability. VTI demonstrates moderate sensitivity and specificity in predicting hospital outcomes such as mortality, in-hospital mortality, resuscitated cardiac arrest, hemodynamic instability or the need for reperfusion therapy.  VTI, offers a non-invasive, real-time diagnostic option. However, study heterogeneity and methodological limitations highlight the need for further research.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal and Emergency Medicine
Internal and Emergency Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信