加强屏障预防,以防止传播金黄色葡萄球菌和碳青霉烯耐药的有机体在养老院慢性呼吸机单位。

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q2 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Lyndsay M O'Hara, Michelle Newman, Alison D Lydecker, Gwen L Robinson, Aaron Hong, Christina Boucher, Patience Osei, Erin K Molloy, J Kristie Johnson, Ayse P Gurses, Heather Jones, Kara Jacobs Slifka, Mary-Claire Roghmann
{"title":"加强屏障预防,以防止传播金黄色葡萄球菌和碳青霉烯耐药的有机体在养老院慢性呼吸机单位。","authors":"Lyndsay M O'Hara, Michelle Newman, Alison D Lydecker, Gwen L Robinson, Aaron Hong, Christina Boucher, Patience Osei, Erin K Molloy, J Kristie Johnson, Ayse P Gurses, Heather Jones, Kara Jacobs Slifka, Mary-Claire Roghmann","doi":"10.1017/ice.2025.10237","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the feasibility and effect of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) on the transmission of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (SA) and carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) among residents in nursing home chronic ventilator units (NH-CVU).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pre-post interventional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two community-based nursing homes with CVUs in Maryland. A total of 56 residents were enrolled in the baseline period and 64 residents were enrolled in the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During a 3-month baseline and intervention period, residents were swabbed monthly to estimate SA and CRO acquisition. During a 2-month training period, EBP was implemented for residents with chronic wounds, medical devices, or history of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization. During the subsequent 3-month intervention period, healthcare personnel (HCP) wore gowns and gloves for high-contact care activities when residents were on EBP. Whole genome sequencing assessed resident-to-resident transmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, NH-CVU1 used gowns and gloves for all direct contact, while NH-CVU2 used EBP only for residents with a history of MDRO colonization. After training, the proportion of NH-CVU2 residents on EBP increased from 65% in the baseline period to 87% in the intervention period. Glove use was high (93-98%) in both NH-CVUs. Gown use increased from 39% to 77% in NH-CVU1 and from 26% to 72% in NH-CVU2. Resident-to-resident transmission of SA or CRO decreased by 25% in NH-CVU1 (<i>p</i> = 0.60) and by 67% in NH-CVU2 (<i>p</i> = 0.05). CRO transmission decreased by 33% in NH-CVU1 (<i>p</i> = 0.54) and by 83% in NH-CVU2 (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EBP is feasible and potentially decreases overall and CRO transmission in nursing home CVUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":13663,"journal":{"name":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced barrier precautions to prevent transmission of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and Carbapenem-resistant organisms in nursing home chronic ventilator units.\",\"authors\":\"Lyndsay M O'Hara, Michelle Newman, Alison D Lydecker, Gwen L Robinson, Aaron Hong, Christina Boucher, Patience Osei, Erin K Molloy, J Kristie Johnson, Ayse P Gurses, Heather Jones, Kara Jacobs Slifka, Mary-Claire Roghmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/ice.2025.10237\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Assess the feasibility and effect of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) on the transmission of <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (SA) and carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) among residents in nursing home chronic ventilator units (NH-CVU).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Pre-post interventional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two community-based nursing homes with CVUs in Maryland. A total of 56 residents were enrolled in the baseline period and 64 residents were enrolled in the intervention period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>During a 3-month baseline and intervention period, residents were swabbed monthly to estimate SA and CRO acquisition. During a 2-month training period, EBP was implemented for residents with chronic wounds, medical devices, or history of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization. During the subsequent 3-month intervention period, healthcare personnel (HCP) wore gowns and gloves for high-contact care activities when residents were on EBP. Whole genome sequencing assessed resident-to-resident transmission.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, NH-CVU1 used gowns and gloves for all direct contact, while NH-CVU2 used EBP only for residents with a history of MDRO colonization. After training, the proportion of NH-CVU2 residents on EBP increased from 65% in the baseline period to 87% in the intervention period. Glove use was high (93-98%) in both NH-CVUs. Gown use increased from 39% to 77% in NH-CVU1 and from 26% to 72% in NH-CVU2. Resident-to-resident transmission of SA or CRO decreased by 25% in NH-CVU1 (<i>p</i> = 0.60) and by 67% in NH-CVU2 (<i>p</i> = 0.05). CRO transmission decreased by 33% in NH-CVU1 (<i>p</i> = 0.54) and by 83% in NH-CVU2 (<i>p</i> = 0.02).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>EBP is feasible and potentially decreases overall and CRO transmission in nursing home CVUs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13663,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10237\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/ice.2025.10237","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价强化屏障防护(EBP)对养老院慢性呼吸机病房(NH-CVU)住院患者中金黄色葡萄球菌(SA)和碳青霉烯类耐药菌(CRO)传播的可行性及效果。设计:介入前后研究。环境:马里兰州两家有cvu的社区养老院。基线期共有56名居民入组,干预期共有64名居民入组。方法:在3个月的基线和干预期间,每月对居民进行拭子取样,评估SA和CRO的获取情况。在2个月的培训期间,对有慢性伤口、医疗器械或多药耐药菌(MDRO)定植史的居民实施EBP。在随后的3个月干预期间,当居民使用EBP时,卫生保健人员(HCP)穿着长袍和手套进行高接触护理活动。全基因组测序评估了居民间传播。结果:基线时,NH-CVU1对所有直接接触者使用防护服和手套,而NH-CVU2仅对有MDRO定殖史的居民使用EBP。培训后,NH-CVU2住院医师参与EBP的比例从基线期的65%增加到干预期的87%。两个nh - cvu的手套使用率都很高(93-98%)。NH-CVU1的长袍使用率从39%增加到77%,NH-CVU2的使用率从26%增加到72%。在NH-CVU1中SA或CRO的居民间传播下降了25% (p = 0.60),在NH-CVU2中下降了67% (p = 0.05)。NH-CVU1和NH-CVU2的CRO传播率分别下降33% (p = 0.54)和83% (p = 0.02)。结论:EBP是可行的,并有可能降低疗养院cvu的总体和CRO传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Enhanced barrier precautions to prevent transmission of Staphylococcus aureus and Carbapenem-resistant organisms in nursing home chronic ventilator units.

Objective: Assess the feasibility and effect of Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) on the transmission of Staphylococcus aureus (SA) and carbapenem-resistant organisms (CRO) among residents in nursing home chronic ventilator units (NH-CVU).

Design: Pre-post interventional study.

Setting: Two community-based nursing homes with CVUs in Maryland. A total of 56 residents were enrolled in the baseline period and 64 residents were enrolled in the intervention period.

Methods: During a 3-month baseline and intervention period, residents were swabbed monthly to estimate SA and CRO acquisition. During a 2-month training period, EBP was implemented for residents with chronic wounds, medical devices, or history of multidrug-resistant organism (MDRO) colonization. During the subsequent 3-month intervention period, healthcare personnel (HCP) wore gowns and gloves for high-contact care activities when residents were on EBP. Whole genome sequencing assessed resident-to-resident transmission.

Results: At baseline, NH-CVU1 used gowns and gloves for all direct contact, while NH-CVU2 used EBP only for residents with a history of MDRO colonization. After training, the proportion of NH-CVU2 residents on EBP increased from 65% in the baseline period to 87% in the intervention period. Glove use was high (93-98%) in both NH-CVUs. Gown use increased from 39% to 77% in NH-CVU1 and from 26% to 72% in NH-CVU2. Resident-to-resident transmission of SA or CRO decreased by 25% in NH-CVU1 (p = 0.60) and by 67% in NH-CVU2 (p = 0.05). CRO transmission decreased by 33% in NH-CVU1 (p = 0.54) and by 83% in NH-CVU2 (p = 0.02).

Conclusions: EBP is feasible and potentially decreases overall and CRO transmission in nursing home CVUs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
289
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology provides original, peer-reviewed scientific articles for anyone involved with an infection control or epidemiology program in a hospital or healthcare facility. Written by infection control practitioners and epidemiologists and guided by an editorial board composed of the nation''s leaders in the field, ICHE provides a critical forum for this vital information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信