触觉模拟器和3d打印牙齿对牙科学生牙髓通道腔自我评估的影响:一项比较先导研究。

IF 7.1 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Sofía Folguera, Pablo Bayón, Sandra Baena, Alexandra Flesariu
{"title":"触觉模拟器和3d打印牙齿对牙科学生牙髓通道腔自我评估的影响:一项比较先导研究。","authors":"Sofía Folguera, Pablo Bayón, Sandra Baena, Alexandra Flesariu","doi":"10.1111/iej.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the impact of two innovative training methods, haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth, on the self-assessment accuracy of dental students when evaluating endodontic access cavities.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, experimental, and comparative educational trial was conducted with undergraduate dental students randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (haptic simulators, n = 12) and Group 3D (3D-printed teeth, n = 10). Participants performed six access cavity preparations over two training sessions and self-assessed their work using a standardised evaluation form. A pre-test and post-test assessment of pre-prepared access cavities was conducted to measure changes in self-assessment accuracy. Evaluations were also performed by experts to establish a gold standard. The percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both groups. Statistical analyses included McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups improved their self-assessment scores over time. However, only Group S showed a statistically significant increase in correct responses in the post-test evaluation (p = 0.009). The overall agreement between participants and experts remained low in both groups, with Cohen's kappa values indicating fair agreement. The primary source of disagreement was overestimation, particularly in Group 3D. While Group S exhibited better alignment with expert assessments over time, differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth both contributed to students' self-assessment skills. However, haptic simulators were more effective in improving self-assessment accuracy. Despite these improvements, agreement with expert evaluations remained low; highlighting the need for additional feedback and guidance during training.</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Haptic Simulators and 3D-Printed Teeth on Dental Students' Self-Assessment of Endodontic Access Cavities: A Comparative Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sofía Folguera, Pablo Bayón, Sandra Baena, Alexandra Flesariu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iej.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the impact of two innovative training methods, haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth, on the self-assessment accuracy of dental students when evaluating endodontic access cavities.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, experimental, and comparative educational trial was conducted with undergraduate dental students randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (haptic simulators, n = 12) and Group 3D (3D-printed teeth, n = 10). Participants performed six access cavity preparations over two training sessions and self-assessed their work using a standardised evaluation form. A pre-test and post-test assessment of pre-prepared access cavities was conducted to measure changes in self-assessment accuracy. Evaluations were also performed by experts to establish a gold standard. The percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both groups. Statistical analyses included McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups improved their self-assessment scores over time. However, only Group S showed a statistically significant increase in correct responses in the post-test evaluation (p = 0.009). The overall agreement between participants and experts remained low in both groups, with Cohen's kappa values indicating fair agreement. The primary source of disagreement was overestimation, particularly in Group 3D. While Group S exhibited better alignment with expert assessments over time, differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth both contributed to students' self-assessment skills. However, haptic simulators were more effective in improving self-assessment accuracy. Despite these improvements, agreement with expert evaluations remained low; highlighting the need for additional feedback and guidance during training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70021\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究旨在比较触觉模拟器和3d打印牙齿两种创新训练方法对牙科学生在评估牙髓通道腔时自我评估准确性的影响。方法:采用前瞻性、实验性、对比性教育试验,将牙科本科学生随机分为两组:S组(触觉模拟器,n = 12)和3D组(3D打印牙齿,n = 10)。参与者在两个培训课程中进行了六次通道腔准备,并使用标准化评估表格对他们的工作进行了自我评估。对预制备的通道腔进行测试前和测试后的评估,以测量自评估准确性的变化。专家还进行了评价,以建立金标准。计算两组的一致性百分比和95%置信区间(CI)的Cohen's kappa系数。统计分析采用McNemar检验、Wilcoxon sign -rank检验和Mann-Whitney U检验(p)。结果:两组自我评估得分均随时间推移而提高。然而,只有S组在测试后评估中正确反应有统计学意义的增加(p = 0.009)。在两组中,参与者和专家之间的总体一致性仍然很低,科恩的kappa值表明了公平的一致性。分歧的主要来源是高估,尤其是在3D组。随着时间的推移,S组表现出与专家评估更好的一致性,但两组之间的差异没有统计学意义。结论:触觉模拟器和3d打印牙齿都有助于学生的自我评估技能。然而,触觉模拟器在提高自我评估准确性方面更为有效。尽管有这些改进,但与专家评价的一致性仍然很低;强调在培训期间需要额外的反馈和指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of Haptic Simulators and 3D-Printed Teeth on Dental Students' Self-Assessment of Endodontic Access Cavities: A Comparative Pilot Study.

Aim: This study aimed to compare the impact of two innovative training methods, haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth, on the self-assessment accuracy of dental students when evaluating endodontic access cavities.

Methodology: A prospective, experimental, and comparative educational trial was conducted with undergraduate dental students randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (haptic simulators, n = 12) and Group 3D (3D-printed teeth, n = 10). Participants performed six access cavity preparations over two training sessions and self-assessed their work using a standardised evaluation form. A pre-test and post-test assessment of pre-prepared access cavities was conducted to measure changes in self-assessment accuracy. Evaluations were also performed by experts to establish a gold standard. The percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both groups. Statistical analyses included McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).

Results: Both groups improved their self-assessment scores over time. However, only Group S showed a statistically significant increase in correct responses in the post-test evaluation (p = 0.009). The overall agreement between participants and experts remained low in both groups, with Cohen's kappa values indicating fair agreement. The primary source of disagreement was overestimation, particularly in Group 3D. While Group S exhibited better alignment with expert assessments over time, differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.

Conclusions: Haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth both contributed to students' self-assessment skills. However, haptic simulators were more effective in improving self-assessment accuracy. Despite these improvements, agreement with expert evaluations remained low; highlighting the need for additional feedback and guidance during training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International endodontic journal
International endodontic journal 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
28.00%
发文量
195
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted. The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信