Sofía Folguera, Pablo Bayón, Sandra Baena, Alexandra Flesariu
{"title":"触觉模拟器和3d打印牙齿对牙科学生牙髓通道腔自我评估的影响:一项比较先导研究。","authors":"Sofía Folguera, Pablo Bayón, Sandra Baena, Alexandra Flesariu","doi":"10.1111/iej.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the impact of two innovative training methods, haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth, on the self-assessment accuracy of dental students when evaluating endodontic access cavities.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, experimental, and comparative educational trial was conducted with undergraduate dental students randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (haptic simulators, n = 12) and Group 3D (3D-printed teeth, n = 10). Participants performed six access cavity preparations over two training sessions and self-assessed their work using a standardised evaluation form. A pre-test and post-test assessment of pre-prepared access cavities was conducted to measure changes in self-assessment accuracy. Evaluations were also performed by experts to establish a gold standard. The percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both groups. Statistical analyses included McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups improved their self-assessment scores over time. However, only Group S showed a statistically significant increase in correct responses in the post-test evaluation (p = 0.009). The overall agreement between participants and experts remained low in both groups, with Cohen's kappa values indicating fair agreement. The primary source of disagreement was overestimation, particularly in Group 3D. While Group S exhibited better alignment with expert assessments over time, differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth both contributed to students' self-assessment skills. However, haptic simulators were more effective in improving self-assessment accuracy. Despite these improvements, agreement with expert evaluations remained low; highlighting the need for additional feedback and guidance during training.</p>","PeriodicalId":13724,"journal":{"name":"International endodontic journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Haptic Simulators and 3D-Printed Teeth on Dental Students' Self-Assessment of Endodontic Access Cavities: A Comparative Pilot Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sofía Folguera, Pablo Bayón, Sandra Baena, Alexandra Flesariu\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/iej.70021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to compare the impact of two innovative training methods, haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth, on the self-assessment accuracy of dental students when evaluating endodontic access cavities.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>A prospective, experimental, and comparative educational trial was conducted with undergraduate dental students randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (haptic simulators, n = 12) and Group 3D (3D-printed teeth, n = 10). Participants performed six access cavity preparations over two training sessions and self-assessed their work using a standardised evaluation form. A pre-test and post-test assessment of pre-prepared access cavities was conducted to measure changes in self-assessment accuracy. Evaluations were also performed by experts to establish a gold standard. The percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both groups. Statistical analyses included McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups improved their self-assessment scores over time. However, only Group S showed a statistically significant increase in correct responses in the post-test evaluation (p = 0.009). The overall agreement between participants and experts remained low in both groups, with Cohen's kappa values indicating fair agreement. The primary source of disagreement was overestimation, particularly in Group 3D. While Group S exhibited better alignment with expert assessments over time, differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth both contributed to students' self-assessment skills. However, haptic simulators were more effective in improving self-assessment accuracy. Despite these improvements, agreement with expert evaluations remained low; highlighting the need for additional feedback and guidance during training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13724,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International endodontic journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70021\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International endodontic journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/iej.70021","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Haptic Simulators and 3D-Printed Teeth on Dental Students' Self-Assessment of Endodontic Access Cavities: A Comparative Pilot Study.
Aim: This study aimed to compare the impact of two innovative training methods, haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth, on the self-assessment accuracy of dental students when evaluating endodontic access cavities.
Methodology: A prospective, experimental, and comparative educational trial was conducted with undergraduate dental students randomly assigned to two groups: Group S (haptic simulators, n = 12) and Group 3D (3D-printed teeth, n = 10). Participants performed six access cavity preparations over two training sessions and self-assessed their work using a standardised evaluation form. A pre-test and post-test assessment of pre-prepared access cavities was conducted to measure changes in self-assessment accuracy. Evaluations were also performed by experts to establish a gold standard. The percentage of agreement and Cohen's kappa coefficient with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for both groups. Statistical analyses included McNemar's test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann-Whitney U test (p < 0.05).
Results: Both groups improved their self-assessment scores over time. However, only Group S showed a statistically significant increase in correct responses in the post-test evaluation (p = 0.009). The overall agreement between participants and experts remained low in both groups, with Cohen's kappa values indicating fair agreement. The primary source of disagreement was overestimation, particularly in Group 3D. While Group S exhibited better alignment with expert assessments over time, differences between the two groups were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: Haptic simulators and 3D-printed teeth both contributed to students' self-assessment skills. However, haptic simulators were more effective in improving self-assessment accuracy. Despite these improvements, agreement with expert evaluations remained low; highlighting the need for additional feedback and guidance during training.
期刊介绍:
The International Endodontic Journal is published monthly and strives to publish original articles of the highest quality to disseminate scientific and clinical knowledge; all manuscripts are subjected to peer review. Original scientific articles are published in the areas of biomedical science, applied materials science, bioengineering, epidemiology and social science relevant to endodontic disease and its management, and to the restoration of root-treated teeth. In addition, review articles, reports of clinical cases, book reviews, summaries and abstracts of scientific meetings and news items are accepted.
The International Endodontic Journal is essential reading for general dental practitioners, specialist endodontists, research, scientists and dental teachers.