解决影响医学专家培训方案的“蟒蛇”危机:组织框架和跨学科见解。

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Louis William Wang
{"title":"解决影响医学专家培训方案的“蟒蛇”危机:组织框架和跨学科见解。","authors":"Louis William Wang","doi":"10.1111/imj.70169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Medical education programmes constantly need to balance numerous and often competing demands of their stakeholders (i.e. trainees, educators, hospital administration, specialist colleges and accrediting bodies). Many of these issues are difficult to resolve; such challenges actually represent a special type of crisis - known as a 'python' crisis in scholarly organisational management literature. Basic physician training programmes are particularly susceptible to 'python'-like crises. These specialist vocational training programmes rely on the goodwill of experienced clinicians, who provide teaching and supervision to trainees on a voluntary basis and whose engagement in teaching activities is often limited because of other work and personal commitments. On top of this, expectations from important internal and external stakeholders collectively act as additional constraints, similar to the constricting coils of a python. Many of these issues remain unresolved over years and are likely to grow over time. Utilising the 'python' metaphor as an analogy, this review integrates interdisciplinary insights from the fields of educational leadership, organisational crisis management, developmental psychology, strategic finance and the natural sciences to offer a framework ('SCALE') that simultaneously aims to improve a training programme's resilience to short-term shocks while fostering long-term sustainability. This proposed framework may prove useful not only for hospital-based training programmes in internal medicine but also education programmes at all levels of medical training.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing the 'python' crisis affecting medical specialist training programmes: organisational frameworks and interdisciplinary insights.\",\"authors\":\"Louis William Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/imj.70169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Medical education programmes constantly need to balance numerous and often competing demands of their stakeholders (i.e. trainees, educators, hospital administration, specialist colleges and accrediting bodies). Many of these issues are difficult to resolve; such challenges actually represent a special type of crisis - known as a 'python' crisis in scholarly organisational management literature. Basic physician training programmes are particularly susceptible to 'python'-like crises. These specialist vocational training programmes rely on the goodwill of experienced clinicians, who provide teaching and supervision to trainees on a voluntary basis and whose engagement in teaching activities is often limited because of other work and personal commitments. On top of this, expectations from important internal and external stakeholders collectively act as additional constraints, similar to the constricting coils of a python. Many of these issues remain unresolved over years and are likely to grow over time. Utilising the 'python' metaphor as an analogy, this review integrates interdisciplinary insights from the fields of educational leadership, organisational crisis management, developmental psychology, strategic finance and the natural sciences to offer a framework ('SCALE') that simultaneously aims to improve a training programme's resilience to short-term shocks while fostering long-term sustainability. This proposed framework may prove useful not only for hospital-based training programmes in internal medicine but also education programmes at all levels of medical training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13625,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Internal Medicine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70169\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医学教育方案不断需要平衡其利益攸关方(即受训人员、教育工作者、医院管理、专业学院和认证机构)的众多且往往相互竞争的需求。其中许多问题很难解决;这些挑战实际上代表了一种特殊类型的危机——在学术组织管理文献中被称为“蟒蛇”危机。基本的医生培训项目特别容易受到“蟒蛇”式危机的影响。这些专业的职业培训计划依赖于经验丰富的临床医生的善意,他们在自愿的基础上为受训者提供教学和监督,由于其他工作和个人承诺,他们参与教学活动的机会往往有限。最重要的是,来自重要的内部和外部利益相关者的期望共同成为额外的约束,类似于蟒蛇的收缩线圈。其中许多问题多年来仍未得到解决,并可能随着时间的推移而加剧。利用“蟒蛇”的比喻作为类比,本综述整合了来自教育领导、组织危机管理、发展心理学、战略金融和自然科学等领域的跨学科见解,提供了一个框架(“SCALE”),同时旨在提高培训计划对短期冲击的弹性,同时促进长期可持续性。这一拟议的框架可能不仅对以医院为基础的内科培训方案有用,而且对各级医疗培训的教育方案也有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Addressing the 'python' crisis affecting medical specialist training programmes: organisational frameworks and interdisciplinary insights.

Medical education programmes constantly need to balance numerous and often competing demands of their stakeholders (i.e. trainees, educators, hospital administration, specialist colleges and accrediting bodies). Many of these issues are difficult to resolve; such challenges actually represent a special type of crisis - known as a 'python' crisis in scholarly organisational management literature. Basic physician training programmes are particularly susceptible to 'python'-like crises. These specialist vocational training programmes rely on the goodwill of experienced clinicians, who provide teaching and supervision to trainees on a voluntary basis and whose engagement in teaching activities is often limited because of other work and personal commitments. On top of this, expectations from important internal and external stakeholders collectively act as additional constraints, similar to the constricting coils of a python. Many of these issues remain unresolved over years and are likely to grow over time. Utilising the 'python' metaphor as an analogy, this review integrates interdisciplinary insights from the fields of educational leadership, organisational crisis management, developmental psychology, strategic finance and the natural sciences to offer a framework ('SCALE') that simultaneously aims to improve a training programme's resilience to short-term shocks while fostering long-term sustainability. This proposed framework may prove useful not only for hospital-based training programmes in internal medicine but also education programmes at all levels of medical training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信