主动脉瓣手术再手术的结果:来自23年来国家登记的数据。

IF 0.6 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Pradeep Narayan, Arnaldo Dimagli, Jeremy Chan, Tim Dong, Charles Tan, Tugba Aydin, Daniel Paul Fudulu, Gianni Davide Angelini
{"title":"主动脉瓣手术再手术的结果:来自23年来国家登记的数据。","authors":"Pradeep Narayan, Arnaldo Dimagli, Jeremy Chan, Tim Dong, Charles Tan, Tugba Aydin, Daniel Paul Fudulu, Gianni Davide Angelini","doi":"10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Over the past two decades, early mortality following re-operative aortic valve surgery has declined significantly; however, it remains higher than that observed after primary isolated valve replacement. We sought to examine temporal trends and identify independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing re-operative aortic valve surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included all patients undergoing re-operative aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the United Kingdom between January-1996 and March-2019 including those with multiple previous operations and those undergoing additional procedures. Data was obtained from the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research database. The primary objective was to assess in-hospital mortality trends. Secondary objective was to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 6,109 re-operative aortic valve surgeries were carried out in the United Kingdom. There were 1,973(32%) females, median age was 69(60-76) years with median duration between the initial and the reoperation being 7(2-13) years. Bio-prosthetic valves were more commonly explanted compared to mechanical valves: 4,125(68%) vs. 1,641(27%). Mortality for elective re-operative cases was 4.8% (<i>n</i> = 166). After adjustments, surgery after 2007, age, number of previous operations, urgency of operation, gender, concomitant procedures, pre-operative chronic kidney disease and endocarditis, were important predictors of outcomes. Mortality showed a downward trend during the study period (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With advances in management strategies, mortality following re-operative AVR continues to decline, but still remains significant. Structural degeneration of bioprosthetic valves continues to be the most common indication for re-operation Emergency re-operations are associated with substantially higher mortality rates; therefore, close follow-up of these patients is essential to facilitate timely elective re-intervention before clinical deterioration.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1.</p>","PeriodicalId":13285,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":"41 9","pages":"1125-1135"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve surgery: data from a national registry over 23 years.\",\"authors\":\"Pradeep Narayan, Arnaldo Dimagli, Jeremy Chan, Tim Dong, Charles Tan, Tugba Aydin, Daniel Paul Fudulu, Gianni Davide Angelini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Over the past two decades, early mortality following re-operative aortic valve surgery has declined significantly; however, it remains higher than that observed after primary isolated valve replacement. We sought to examine temporal trends and identify independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing re-operative aortic valve surgery.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>The study included all patients undergoing re-operative aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the United Kingdom between January-1996 and March-2019 including those with multiple previous operations and those undergoing additional procedures. Data was obtained from the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research database. The primary objective was to assess in-hospital mortality trends. Secondary objective was to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 6,109 re-operative aortic valve surgeries were carried out in the United Kingdom. There were 1,973(32%) females, median age was 69(60-76) years with median duration between the initial and the reoperation being 7(2-13) years. Bio-prosthetic valves were more commonly explanted compared to mechanical valves: 4,125(68%) vs. 1,641(27%). Mortality for elective re-operative cases was 4.8% (<i>n</i> = 166). After adjustments, surgery after 2007, age, number of previous operations, urgency of operation, gender, concomitant procedures, pre-operative chronic kidney disease and endocarditis, were important predictors of outcomes. Mortality showed a downward trend during the study period (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>With advances in management strategies, mortality following re-operative AVR continues to decline, but still remains significant. Structural degeneration of bioprosthetic valves continues to be the most common indication for re-operation Emergency re-operations are associated with substantially higher mortality rates; therefore, close follow-up of these patients is essential to facilitate timely elective re-intervention before clinical deterioration.</p><p><strong>Graphical abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13285,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"volume\":\"41 9\",\"pages\":\"1125-1135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12373612/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在过去的二十年中,主动脉瓣再手术后的早期死亡率显著下降;然而,它仍然比初次隔离瓣膜置换术后观察到的要高。我们试图检查再次接受主动脉瓣手术的患者的时间趋势和确定不良结果的独立预测因素。方法:该研究纳入了1996年1月至2019年3月期间在英国接受再手术主动脉瓣置换术(AVR)的所有患者,包括多次手术和接受其他手术的患者。数据来自美国国家心血管结果研究所数据库。主要目的是评估住院死亡率趋势。次要目的是确定院内死亡的危险因素。进行多变量分析以确定院内死亡的独立危险因素。结果:在研究期间,英国共进行了6109例主动脉瓣再手术。女性1973例(32%),中位年龄69(60-76)岁,首次手术至再次手术的中位时间为7(2-13)年。与机械瓣膜相比,生物瓣膜移植更为常见:4125例(68%)比1641例(27%)。选择性再手术病例的死亡率为4.8% (n = 166)。调整后,2007年后的手术、年龄、既往手术次数、手术紧迫性、性别、合并手术、术前慢性肾脏疾病和心内膜炎是预后的重要预测因素。结论:随着治疗策略的进步,再手术AVR的死亡率继续下降,但仍具有显著性。生物假体瓣膜的结构退化仍然是再手术最常见的指征,紧急再手术与高得多的死亡率相关;因此,对这些患者进行密切随访是必要的,以便在临床恶化前及时进行选择性再干预。图片摘要:补充资料:在线版本包含补充资料,网址为10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Outcomes of reoperative aortic valve surgery: data from a national registry over 23 years.

Objective: Over the past two decades, early mortality following re-operative aortic valve surgery has declined significantly; however, it remains higher than that observed after primary isolated valve replacement. We sought to examine temporal trends and identify independent predictors of adverse outcomes in patients undergoing re-operative aortic valve surgery.

Method: The study included all patients undergoing re-operative aortic valve replacement (AVR) in the United Kingdom between January-1996 and March-2019 including those with multiple previous operations and those undergoing additional procedures. Data was obtained from the National Institute of Cardiovascular Outcomes Research database. The primary objective was to assess in-hospital mortality trends. Secondary objective was to identify risk factors for in-hospital mortality. Multivariable analysis was carried out to identify independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

Results: During the study period, 6,109 re-operative aortic valve surgeries were carried out in the United Kingdom. There were 1,973(32%) females, median age was 69(60-76) years with median duration between the initial and the reoperation being 7(2-13) years. Bio-prosthetic valves were more commonly explanted compared to mechanical valves: 4,125(68%) vs. 1,641(27%). Mortality for elective re-operative cases was 4.8% (n = 166). After adjustments, surgery after 2007, age, number of previous operations, urgency of operation, gender, concomitant procedures, pre-operative chronic kidney disease and endocarditis, were important predictors of outcomes. Mortality showed a downward trend during the study period (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: With advances in management strategies, mortality following re-operative AVR continues to decline, but still remains significant. Structural degeneration of bioprosthetic valves continues to be the most common indication for re-operation Emergency re-operations are associated with substantially higher mortality rates; therefore, close follow-up of these patients is essential to facilitate timely elective re-intervention before clinical deterioration.

Graphical abstract:

Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-025-01980-1.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
14.30%
发文量
141
期刊介绍: The primary aim of the Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is education. The journal aims to dissipate current clinical practices and developments in the area of cardiovascular and thoracic surgery. This includes information on cardiovascular epidemiology, aetiopathogenesis, clinical manifestation etc. The journal accepts manuscripts from cardiovascular anaesthesia, cardiothoracic and vascular nursing and technology development and new/innovative products.The journal is the official publication of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgeons which has a membership of over 1000 at present.DescriptionThe journal is the official organ of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular-Thoracic Surgeons. It was started in 1982 by Dr. Solomon Victor and ws being published twice a year up to 1996. From 2000 the editorial office moved to Delhi. From 2001 the journal was extended to quarterly and subsequently four issues annually have been printed out at time and regularly without fail. The journal receives manuscripts from members and non-members and cardiovascular surgeons. The manuscripts are peer reviewed by at least two or sometimes three or four reviewers who are on the panel. The manuscript process is now completely online. Funding the journal comes partially from the organization and from revenue generated by subscription and advertisement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信