评估风险分类对第四医院最佳完成用药史患者排序的有效性

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Marissa Ryan, Jane Dunsdon, Karl Winckel, Kate Ziser, Linh Phi, Manae Tominaga, Elizabeth Currey, Nazanin Falconer, Centaine L Snoswell
{"title":"评估风险分类对第四医院最佳完成用药史患者排序的有效性","authors":"Marissa Ryan, Jane Dunsdon, Karl Winckel, Kate Ziser, Linh Phi, Manae Tominaga, Elizabeth Currey, Nazanin Falconer, Centaine L Snoswell","doi":"10.1177/00185787251365525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pharmacist Workload Prioritisation Work Instruction (PWPWI) was developed to optimise clinical pharmacy services, such as best possible medication history (BPMH) completion. Inpatients are assigned a risk category and associated BPMH completion timeframe.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the proportion of inpatients who met criteria for urgent, high, moderate, and low risk, and the proportion in each category who were reviewed within 24 hours of admission, to inform PWPWI updates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Clinical, pathologic, medication data, and whether or not the BPMH was completed within 24-hours, was retrospectively collected for inpatients from a single institution and the PWPWI was used to assign risk category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was collected for 280 patients. Prioritisation risk categories were assigned as 3% urgent and requiring immediate review, 61% high risk requiring review within 24-hours, 2% moderate risk requiring review within 48-hours, and 34% low risk. Overall, BPMHs were completed within 24-hours for 54% patients; 50% of the urgent risk individuals, 57% of the high risk, 100% of the moderate risk, and 46% of the low risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that nearly two-thirds of patients were urgent or high risk, affecting the completion timeframes. The study's findings, including four key recommendations, will update the PWPWI. Regular evaluations of such tools are suggested to adapt to changes in clinical care and local context. Following the update, the pharmacy department will receive training to optimise BPMH prioritisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":13002,"journal":{"name":"Hospital Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":"00185787251365525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Risk Categories for Prioritising Patients for Best Possible Medication History Completion at a Quaternary Hospital.\",\"authors\":\"Marissa Ryan, Jane Dunsdon, Karl Winckel, Kate Ziser, Linh Phi, Manae Tominaga, Elizabeth Currey, Nazanin Falconer, Centaine L Snoswell\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00185787251365525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Pharmacist Workload Prioritisation Work Instruction (PWPWI) was developed to optimise clinical pharmacy services, such as best possible medication history (BPMH) completion. Inpatients are assigned a risk category and associated BPMH completion timeframe.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To determine the proportion of inpatients who met criteria for urgent, high, moderate, and low risk, and the proportion in each category who were reviewed within 24 hours of admission, to inform PWPWI updates.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Clinical, pathologic, medication data, and whether or not the BPMH was completed within 24-hours, was retrospectively collected for inpatients from a single institution and the PWPWI was used to assign risk category.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data was collected for 280 patients. Prioritisation risk categories were assigned as 3% urgent and requiring immediate review, 61% high risk requiring review within 24-hours, 2% moderate risk requiring review within 48-hours, and 34% low risk. Overall, BPMHs were completed within 24-hours for 54% patients; 50% of the urgent risk individuals, 57% of the high risk, 100% of the moderate risk, and 46% of the low risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study found that nearly two-thirds of patients were urgent or high risk, affecting the completion timeframes. The study's findings, including four key recommendations, will update the PWPWI. Regular evaluations of such tools are suggested to adapt to changes in clinical care and local context. Following the update, the pharmacy department will receive training to optimise BPMH prioritisation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"00185787251365525\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12394193/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251365525\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00185787251365525","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:药剂师工作量优先排序工作指导(PWPWI)的开发是为了优化临床药学服务,如最佳用药史(BPMH)完成。给住院患者分配风险类别和相关的BPMH完成时间表。目的:确定符合紧急、高、中、低风险标准的住院患者的比例,以及在入院24小时内对每个类别进行复查的比例,以通知PWPWI更新。方法:回顾性收集同一医院住院患者的临床、病理、用药资料,以及是否在24小时内完成BPMH检查,并采用PWPWI进行风险分类。结果:收集了280例患者的资料。优先级风险分类为:3%紧急需要立即审查,61%高风险需要在24小时内审查,2%中等风险需要在48小时内审查,34%低风险。总体而言,54%的患者在24小时内完成了bpmh;50%的紧急风险个体,57%的高风险个体,100%的中度风险个体,46%的低风险个体。结论:本研究发现近三分之二的患者为急症或高危患者,影响了完成时间。该研究的结果,包括四项主要建议,将更新《PWPWI》。建议对这些工具进行定期评估,以适应临床护理和当地情况的变化。更新后,药剂科将接受培训,以优化BPMH的优先级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Risk Categories for Prioritising Patients for Best Possible Medication History Completion at a Quaternary Hospital.

Background: The Pharmacist Workload Prioritisation Work Instruction (PWPWI) was developed to optimise clinical pharmacy services, such as best possible medication history (BPMH) completion. Inpatients are assigned a risk category and associated BPMH completion timeframe.

Aim: To determine the proportion of inpatients who met criteria for urgent, high, moderate, and low risk, and the proportion in each category who were reviewed within 24 hours of admission, to inform PWPWI updates.

Method: Clinical, pathologic, medication data, and whether or not the BPMH was completed within 24-hours, was retrospectively collected for inpatients from a single institution and the PWPWI was used to assign risk category.

Results: Data was collected for 280 patients. Prioritisation risk categories were assigned as 3% urgent and requiring immediate review, 61% high risk requiring review within 24-hours, 2% moderate risk requiring review within 48-hours, and 34% low risk. Overall, BPMHs were completed within 24-hours for 54% patients; 50% of the urgent risk individuals, 57% of the high risk, 100% of the moderate risk, and 46% of the low risk.

Conclusion: This study found that nearly two-thirds of patients were urgent or high risk, affecting the completion timeframes. The study's findings, including four key recommendations, will update the PWPWI. Regular evaluations of such tools are suggested to adapt to changes in clinical care and local context. Following the update, the pharmacy department will receive training to optimise BPMH prioritisation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hospital Pharmacy
Hospital Pharmacy PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: Hospital Pharmacy is a monthly peer-reviewed journal that is read by pharmacists and other providers practicing in the inpatient and outpatient setting within hospitals, long-term care facilities, home care, and other health-system settings The Hospital Pharmacy Assistant Editor, Michael R. Cohen, RPh, MS, DSc, FASHP, is author of a Medication Error Report Analysis and founder of The Institute for Safe Medication Practices (ISMP), a nonprofit organization that provides education about adverse drug events and their prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信