{"title":"手术切除对全身药物治疗后肝细胞癌的影响:一项多中心回顾性观察研究。","authors":"Takamichi Ishii, Junichi Shindoh, Ikuo Nakamura, Seiko Hirono, Masaki Wakasugi, Akihiko Ichida, Takashi Hamada, Hajime Matsushima, Takahiro Nishio, Yukio Tokumitsu, Hidenori Takahashi, Yuji Morine, Shinichiro Yamada, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Susumu Eguchi, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Etsuro Hatano","doi":"10.1111/hepr.70027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study is aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of surgical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy, address the therapeutic benefit, and identify candidates for surgery after systemic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at seven high-volume centers in Japan, enrolling patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC after systemic drug therapy. Pre- and post-treatment resectability criteria and oncological outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], pathological complete response [pCR], and postoperative complications) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 96 patients (mean age 68.3 years). The first-line systemic therapies were sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 2/60/33/1, respectively). The pre-treatment oncological resectability criteria were R/BR1/BR2 (n = 8/42/46, respectively) and the pre-surgery criteria were R/BR1/BR2 (n = 13/41/42, respectively). Surgical procedures included 87 hepatectomies (42 major, 45 minor) and 9 non-hepatectomy procedures. The median PFS was 0.9 years with 1-, 2-, and 5-year PFS rates of 45.2%, 35.0%, and 25.6%, and the median OS was 4.0 years with 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates of 86.1%, 64.5%, and 39.9%, respectively. R0/1 resection rate was 83.3%, and pCR rate was 18.8%. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) occurred in 18.8%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 0% and a 90-day mortality rate of 4.2%. R0/1 resection was independently associated with better PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical resection following systemic therapy demonstrated favorable safety and long-term outcomes in advanced HCC. R0/1 resection is a key determinant of the prognosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":12987,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Surgical Resection on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Systemic Drug Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.\",\"authors\":\"Takamichi Ishii, Junichi Shindoh, Ikuo Nakamura, Seiko Hirono, Masaki Wakasugi, Akihiko Ichida, Takashi Hamada, Hajime Matsushima, Takahiro Nishio, Yukio Tokumitsu, Hidenori Takahashi, Yuji Morine, Shinichiro Yamada, Akiyoshi Nakakura, Susumu Eguchi, Kiyoshi Hasegawa, Etsuro Hatano\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hepr.70027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study is aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of surgical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy, address the therapeutic benefit, and identify candidates for surgery after systemic treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study was conducted at seven high-volume centers in Japan, enrolling patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC after systemic drug therapy. Pre- and post-treatment resectability criteria and oncological outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], pathological complete response [pCR], and postoperative complications) were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 96 patients (mean age 68.3 years). The first-line systemic therapies were sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 2/60/33/1, respectively). The pre-treatment oncological resectability criteria were R/BR1/BR2 (n = 8/42/46, respectively) and the pre-surgery criteria were R/BR1/BR2 (n = 13/41/42, respectively). Surgical procedures included 87 hepatectomies (42 major, 45 minor) and 9 non-hepatectomy procedures. The median PFS was 0.9 years with 1-, 2-, and 5-year PFS rates of 45.2%, 35.0%, and 25.6%, and the median OS was 4.0 years with 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates of 86.1%, 64.5%, and 39.9%, respectively. R0/1 resection rate was 83.3%, and pCR rate was 18.8%. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) occurred in 18.8%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 0% and a 90-day mortality rate of 4.2%. R0/1 resection was independently associated with better PFS and OS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surgical resection following systemic therapy demonstrated favorable safety and long-term outcomes in advanced HCC. R0/1 resection is a key determinant of the prognosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12987,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70027\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hepr.70027","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Surgical Resection on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Systemic Drug Therapy: A Multicenter Retrospective Observational Study.
Aim: This study is aimed to evaluate the safety and outcomes of surgical resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with systemic therapy, address the therapeutic benefit, and identify candidates for surgery after systemic treatment.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study was conducted at seven high-volume centers in Japan, enrolling patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC after systemic drug therapy. Pre- and post-treatment resectability criteria and oncological outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], overall survival [OS], pathological complete response [pCR], and postoperative complications) were analyzed.
Results: The cohort included 96 patients (mean age 68.3 years). The first-line systemic therapies were sorafenib, lenvatinib, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, and durvalumab plus tremelimumab (n = 2/60/33/1, respectively). The pre-treatment oncological resectability criteria were R/BR1/BR2 (n = 8/42/46, respectively) and the pre-surgery criteria were R/BR1/BR2 (n = 13/41/42, respectively). Surgical procedures included 87 hepatectomies (42 major, 45 minor) and 9 non-hepatectomy procedures. The median PFS was 0.9 years with 1-, 2-, and 5-year PFS rates of 45.2%, 35.0%, and 25.6%, and the median OS was 4.0 years with 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS rates of 86.1%, 64.5%, and 39.9%, respectively. R0/1 resection rate was 83.3%, and pCR rate was 18.8%. Postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ IIIa) occurred in 18.8%, with a 30-day mortality rate of 0% and a 90-day mortality rate of 4.2%. R0/1 resection was independently associated with better PFS and OS.
Conclusions: Surgical resection following systemic therapy demonstrated favorable safety and long-term outcomes in advanced HCC. R0/1 resection is a key determinant of the prognosis.
期刊介绍:
Hepatology Research (formerly International Hepatology Communications) is the official journal of the Japan Society of Hepatology, and publishes original articles, reviews and short comunications dealing with hepatology. Reviews or mini-reviews are especially welcomed from those areas within hepatology undergoing rapid changes. Short communications should contain concise definitive information.