Gurkan Bozdag, Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin, Sinan Ozkavukcu, Meral Gultomruk, Mustafa Bahceci
{"title":"当只有一个囊胚可用于移植时,囊胚与卵母细胞的比例能否预测活产?","authors":"Gurkan Bozdag, Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin, Sinan Ozkavukcu, Meral Gultomruk, Mustafa Bahceci","doi":"10.1159/000548078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether having only one blastocyst-stage embryo on Day 5/6 rectify the live birth rate (LBR) when various number of oocytes had been collected.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study from two in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers has been conducted. Participants/Materials: The study included women undergoing IVF treatment whose cycles resulted in only one blastocyst-stage embryo available for frozen transfer on Day 5/6. Cases with no oocyte retrieval, no blastocyst development, or missing clinical data were excluded. There were no restrictions based on female age or BMI to reflect real-world clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A multi-center study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 2,125 single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer cycles performed between November 2018 and February 2023. All patients had only one blastocyst-stage embryo available for transfer on Day 5/6, regardless of the number of oocytes retrieved during controlled ovarian stimulation. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on their blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio. Baseline demographic, ovarian stimulation, and embryological parameters were compared across quartiles. The primary outcome was the LBR. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of the LBR, including female age, embryo quality, BMI, and blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio was 18.6%. Patients in the lowest quartile had significantly younger mean age and higher AMH levels compared to the highest quartile. Although blastocyst development rates increased across quartiles, the LBR was lower in the highest quartile from all other groups (24.5% vs. 31.9 to 29.9%). When the LBR was analyzed as dependent variable, binary logistic regression identified female age (β = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and embryo quality (β = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.62-3.39, p < 0.001, compared with moderate-quality embryos; β = 4.22, 95% CI: 2.91-6.11, p < 0.001, compared with poor-quality embryos) as independent predictors. However, the blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio did not demonstrate a significant association with the LBR.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The retrospective design and absence of genetic testing for embryo ploidy might limit the ability to establish causality. Variability in laboratory conditions and stimulation protocols may also have introduced confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio does not significantly impact the LBR when only one blastocyst is available for transfer. Instead, female age and embryo quality remain the most critical factors in determining the LBR. These findings emphasize the importance of embryo selection over numerical ovarian response parameters in clinical decision-making to obtain live birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Blastocyst-To-Oocyte Ratio Predict Live Birth When Only One Blastocyst Is Available For Transfer?\",\"authors\":\"Gurkan Bozdag, Fazilet Kubra Boynukalin, Sinan Ozkavukcu, Meral Gultomruk, Mustafa Bahceci\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000548078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate whether having only one blastocyst-stage embryo on Day 5/6 rectify the live birth rate (LBR) when various number of oocytes had been collected.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A retrospective cohort study from two in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers has been conducted. Participants/Materials: The study included women undergoing IVF treatment whose cycles resulted in only one blastocyst-stage embryo available for frozen transfer on Day 5/6. Cases with no oocyte retrieval, no blastocyst development, or missing clinical data were excluded. There were no restrictions based on female age or BMI to reflect real-world clinical conditions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A multi-center study was conducted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study included 2,125 single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer cycles performed between November 2018 and February 2023. All patients had only one blastocyst-stage embryo available for transfer on Day 5/6, regardless of the number of oocytes retrieved during controlled ovarian stimulation. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on their blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio. Baseline demographic, ovarian stimulation, and embryological parameters were compared across quartiles. The primary outcome was the LBR. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of the LBR, including female age, embryo quality, BMI, and blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio was 18.6%. Patients in the lowest quartile had significantly younger mean age and higher AMH levels compared to the highest quartile. Although blastocyst development rates increased across quartiles, the LBR was lower in the highest quartile from all other groups (24.5% vs. 31.9 to 29.9%). When the LBR was analyzed as dependent variable, binary logistic regression identified female age (β = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and embryo quality (β = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.62-3.39, p < 0.001, compared with moderate-quality embryos; β = 4.22, 95% CI: 2.91-6.11, p < 0.001, compared with poor-quality embryos) as independent predictors. However, the blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio did not demonstrate a significant association with the LBR.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The retrospective design and absence of genetic testing for embryo ploidy might limit the ability to establish causality. Variability in laboratory conditions and stimulation protocols may also have introduced confounding factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio does not significantly impact the LBR when only one blastocyst is available for transfer. Instead, female age and embryo quality remain the most critical factors in determining the LBR. These findings emphasize the importance of embryo selection over numerical ovarian response parameters in clinical decision-making to obtain live birth.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548078\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000548078","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:本研究旨在评价在收集不同数量卵母细胞的情况下,第5/6天只有一个囊胚期胚胎是否能纠正活产率(LBR)。设计:来自两个IVF中心的回顾性队列研究。参与者/材料:该研究包括接受体外受精治疗的妇女,其周期导致在第5/6天只有一个囊胚期胚胎可用于冷冻移植。没有卵母细胞回收,没有囊胚发育,或缺少临床资料的病例被排除在外。没有基于女性年龄或BMI的限制来反映真实的临床状况。环境:多中心研究。方法:本回顾性队列研究包括2018年11月至2023年2月期间进行的2125例单囊胚冷冻胚胎移植(FET)周期。所有患者在第5/6天只有一个囊胚期胚胎可用于移植,无论在控制卵巢刺激中获得多少卵母细胞。根据囊胚与卵母细胞的比例将患者分为四分位数。基线人口统计学、卵巢刺激和胚胎学参数在四分位数之间进行比较。主要终点为活产率(LBR)。采用二元logistic回归确定LBR的独立预测因子,包括女性年龄、胚胎质量、BMI和囊胚与卵母细胞比例。结果:平均囊胚与卵母细胞比值为18.6%。与最高四分位数相比,最低四分位数的患者平均年龄明显更年轻,AMH水平也更高。尽管囊胚发育率在各个四分位数中都有所增加,但LBR在所有其他组中最高的四分位数较低(24.5%比31.9 - 29.9%)。当LBR作为依赖变量进行分析时,二元logistic回归确定女性年龄(β = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001)和胚胎质量(β = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.62-3.39, p < 0.001,与中等质量胚胎相比;β = 4.22, 95% CI: 2.91-6.11, p < 0.001,与劣质胚胎相比)为独立预测因子。然而,囊胚与卵母细胞的比例均未显示与LBR有显著关联。局限性:回顾性设计和缺乏胚胎倍性基因检测可能会限制建立因果关系的能力。实验室条件和刺激方案的变化也可能引入混淆因素。结论:当只有一个囊胚可用于移植时,囊胚与卵母细胞的比例对LBR无显著影响。相反,雌性年龄和胚胎质量仍然是决定LBR的最关键因素。这些发现强调了胚胎选择在临床决策中获得活产的重要性,而不是数字卵巢反应参数。
Does Blastocyst-To-Oocyte Ratio Predict Live Birth When Only One Blastocyst Is Available For Transfer?
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether having only one blastocyst-stage embryo on Day 5/6 rectify the live birth rate (LBR) when various number of oocytes had been collected.
Design: A retrospective cohort study from two in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers has been conducted. Participants/Materials: The study included women undergoing IVF treatment whose cycles resulted in only one blastocyst-stage embryo available for frozen transfer on Day 5/6. Cases with no oocyte retrieval, no blastocyst development, or missing clinical data were excluded. There were no restrictions based on female age or BMI to reflect real-world clinical conditions.
Setting: A multi-center study was conducted.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 2,125 single blastocyst frozen embryo transfer cycles performed between November 2018 and February 2023. All patients had only one blastocyst-stage embryo available for transfer on Day 5/6, regardless of the number of oocytes retrieved during controlled ovarian stimulation. Patients were stratified into quartiles based on their blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio. Baseline demographic, ovarian stimulation, and embryological parameters were compared across quartiles. The primary outcome was the LBR. Binary logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of the LBR, including female age, embryo quality, BMI, and blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio.
Results: The mean blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio was 18.6%. Patients in the lowest quartile had significantly younger mean age and higher AMH levels compared to the highest quartile. Although blastocyst development rates increased across quartiles, the LBR was lower in the highest quartile from all other groups (24.5% vs. 31.9 to 29.9%). When the LBR was analyzed as dependent variable, binary logistic regression identified female age (β = 0.93, 95% CI: 0.92-0.95, p < 0.001) and embryo quality (β = 2.35, 95% CI: 1.62-3.39, p < 0.001, compared with moderate-quality embryos; β = 4.22, 95% CI: 2.91-6.11, p < 0.001, compared with poor-quality embryos) as independent predictors. However, the blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio did not demonstrate a significant association with the LBR.
Limitations: The retrospective design and absence of genetic testing for embryo ploidy might limit the ability to establish causality. Variability in laboratory conditions and stimulation protocols may also have introduced confounding factors.
Conclusions: The blastocyst-to-oocyte ratio does not significantly impact the LBR when only one blastocyst is available for transfer. Instead, female age and embryo quality remain the most critical factors in determining the LBR. These findings emphasize the importance of embryo selection over numerical ovarian response parameters in clinical decision-making to obtain live birth.
期刊介绍:
This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.