血友病患者疼痛管理技能与知识的差距分析——质性研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Haemophilia Pub Date : 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1111/hae.70112
Paul McLaughlin, Pratima Chowdary, Catherine Harrison, David Stephensen, Nathalie Roussel
{"title":"血友病患者疼痛管理技能与知识的差距分析——质性研究。","authors":"Paul McLaughlin,&nbsp;Pratima Chowdary,&nbsp;Catherine Harrison,&nbsp;David Stephensen,&nbsp;Nathalie Roussel","doi":"10.1111/hae.70112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>People with haemophilia continue to experience pain impacting activities of daily living despite the advances in haemostatic treatments. Although guidelines exist, pain management in the clinical setting remains inadequate. It is unclear why this gap in practice persists. This study aimed to explore the practice and experience of pain management by haemophilia healthcare professionals (HCPs) to better understand perceived competency and barriers/facilitators to appropriate care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>European HCPs working ≥ 3 years in haemophilia care were invited to participate (haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals). Data were collected using profession-specific focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews, recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Twenty-three HCPs (6 haematologists, 7 nurses, 6 physiotherapists, 4 psychosocial professionals) from 10 European countries agreed to participate. Four themes were constructed: (1) Defining who is responsible: the challenges in multidisciplinary team provision for good pain management; (2) the concept of pain and its management exists in multiple temporalities; (3) aspirations for better pain management are limited by prevailing biomedicalism; (4) pain management can be better—knowledge and experience improves confidence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>These data demonstrate a gap in confidence in the delivery of effective pain management, influenced by individual knowledge and skills and wider geographical determinants of healthcare delivery. There is a need for services to establish who is responsible for pain management and better understand professional role identity. Mechanisms to support the implementation of better pain care in haemophilia need to be explored.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":"31 5","pages":"988-996"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gap Analysis Investigating Healthcare Professionals’ Skills and Knowledge for Pain Management in Haemophilia—A Qualitative Study\",\"authors\":\"Paul McLaughlin,&nbsp;Pratima Chowdary,&nbsp;Catherine Harrison,&nbsp;David Stephensen,&nbsp;Nathalie Roussel\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hae.70112\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>People with haemophilia continue to experience pain impacting activities of daily living despite the advances in haemostatic treatments. Although guidelines exist, pain management in the clinical setting remains inadequate. It is unclear why this gap in practice persists. This study aimed to explore the practice and experience of pain management by haemophilia healthcare professionals (HCPs) to better understand perceived competency and barriers/facilitators to appropriate care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>European HCPs working ≥ 3 years in haemophilia care were invited to participate (haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals). Data were collected using profession-specific focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews, recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Twenty-three HCPs (6 haematologists, 7 nurses, 6 physiotherapists, 4 psychosocial professionals) from 10 European countries agreed to participate. Four themes were constructed: (1) Defining who is responsible: the challenges in multidisciplinary team provision for good pain management; (2) the concept of pain and its management exists in multiple temporalities; (3) aspirations for better pain management are limited by prevailing biomedicalism; (4) pain management can be better—knowledge and experience improves confidence.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Discussion</h3>\\n \\n <p>These data demonstrate a gap in confidence in the delivery of effective pain management, influenced by individual knowledge and skills and wider geographical determinants of healthcare delivery. There is a need for services to establish who is responsible for pain management and better understand professional role identity. Mechanisms to support the implementation of better pain care in haemophilia need to be explored.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haemophilia\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"988-996\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haemophilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hae.70112\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hae.70112","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:尽管止血治疗取得了进展,血友病患者仍然会经历影响日常生活活动的疼痛。尽管存在指导方针,但临床环境中的疼痛管理仍然不足。目前尚不清楚为什么这种差距在实践中持续存在。本研究旨在探讨血友病医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)疼痛管理的实践和经验,以更好地了解感知能力和障碍/促进适当护理。方法:邀请在血友病护理工作≥3年的欧洲HCPs(血液病学家、护士、物理治疗师和社会心理专业人员)参与。数据通过专业特定的焦点小组和半结构化的个人访谈收集,并进行记录和转录。使用反身主题分析对数据进行分析。结果:来自10个欧洲国家的23名HCPs(6名血液科医生、7名护士、6名物理治疗师、4名社会心理专业人员)同意参与。构建了四个主题:(1)确定谁负责:多学科团队提供良好疼痛管理的挑战;(2)疼痛的概念及其管理存在于多个时间;(3)对更好的疼痛管理的期望受到流行的生物医学的限制;(4)疼痛管理可以更好,知识和经验提高信心。讨论:这些数据表明,在提供有效的疼痛管理方面存在信心差距,受到个人知识和技能以及医疗保健提供的更广泛的地理决定因素的影响。有必要提供服务来确定谁负责疼痛管理,并更好地理解专业角色身份。需要探索支持在血友病中实施更好的疼痛护理的机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Gap Analysis Investigating Healthcare Professionals’ Skills and Knowledge for Pain Management in Haemophilia—A Qualitative Study

Gap Analysis Investigating Healthcare Professionals’ Skills and Knowledge for Pain Management in Haemophilia—A Qualitative Study

Introduction

People with haemophilia continue to experience pain impacting activities of daily living despite the advances in haemostatic treatments. Although guidelines exist, pain management in the clinical setting remains inadequate. It is unclear why this gap in practice persists. This study aimed to explore the practice and experience of pain management by haemophilia healthcare professionals (HCPs) to better understand perceived competency and barriers/facilitators to appropriate care.

Methods

European HCPs working ≥ 3 years in haemophilia care were invited to participate (haematologists, nurses, physiotherapists and psychosocial professionals). Data were collected using profession-specific focus groups and semi-structured individual interviews, recorded and transcribed. The data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis.

Results

Twenty-three HCPs (6 haematologists, 7 nurses, 6 physiotherapists, 4 psychosocial professionals) from 10 European countries agreed to participate. Four themes were constructed: (1) Defining who is responsible: the challenges in multidisciplinary team provision for good pain management; (2) the concept of pain and its management exists in multiple temporalities; (3) aspirations for better pain management are limited by prevailing biomedicalism; (4) pain management can be better—knowledge and experience improves confidence.

Discussion

These data demonstrate a gap in confidence in the delivery of effective pain management, influenced by individual knowledge and skills and wider geographical determinants of healthcare delivery. There is a need for services to establish who is responsible for pain management and better understand professional role identity. Mechanisms to support the implementation of better pain care in haemophilia need to be explored.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Haemophilia
Haemophilia 医学-血液学
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
28.20%
发文量
226
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include: clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies component therapy in the developing world transfusion transmitted disease haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics nursing laboratory diagnosis carrier detection psycho-social concerns economic issues audit inherited platelet disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信