Federico Germini, Carlo Cossa, Elisabetta Trinari, Emma Iserman, Quazi Ibrahim, Drashti Pete, Arun Keepanasseril, David Page, Mark W Skinner, Alfonso Iorio
{"title":"通过加拿大出血性疾病登记处(CBDR)管理患者报告的结果、负担和经历(PROBE)问卷的可行性以及两个来源数据的比较","authors":"Federico Germini, Carlo Cossa, Elisabetta Trinari, Emma Iserman, Quazi Ibrahim, Drashti Pete, Arun Keepanasseril, David Page, Mark W Skinner, Alfonso Iorio","doi":"10.1111/hae.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire can be used to measure quality of life in persons with haemophilia (PWH) and is integrated in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR). This offers the opportunity to compare the same data inputted by patients in PROBE and their treating team in CBDR.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting PROBE data through CBDR and to compare the data collected from these two sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study among PWH using MyCBDR. Participants were invited to digitally complete the PROBE questionnaire at baseline and to repeat it at 6 and 12 months. Additional data were passively collected through CBDR. Data from PROBE and CBDR were compared using Kappa agreement, intraclass correlation (ICC) and Pearson correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 PWH participated. Recruitment ratios were 21.1% and 12.0% for the two phases. Retention rates were 40.8% at 6 months and 32.4% at 12 months. Three hundred thirteen subjects were involved in the comparison between PROBE and CBDR data. The agreement was good to very good (κ > 0.75) or the correlation very strong, with the exception of the history of inhibitor (κ = 0.57), recent bleeds (κ = 0.48) and current treatment regimen (κ = 0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of PROBE with CBDR is feasible and PROBE is a reliable tool for routine PRO data collection. Its use in clinical practice may improve data quality and personalized and patient-centred care.</p>","PeriodicalId":12819,"journal":{"name":"Haemophilia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feasibility of Administering the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Questionnaire Through the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) and Comparison of Data From the Two Sources.\",\"authors\":\"Federico Germini, Carlo Cossa, Elisabetta Trinari, Emma Iserman, Quazi Ibrahim, Drashti Pete, Arun Keepanasseril, David Page, Mark W Skinner, Alfonso Iorio\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/hae.70117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire can be used to measure quality of life in persons with haemophilia (PWH) and is integrated in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR). This offers the opportunity to compare the same data inputted by patients in PROBE and their treating team in CBDR.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting PROBE data through CBDR and to compare the data collected from these two sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective observational study among PWH using MyCBDR. Participants were invited to digitally complete the PROBE questionnaire at baseline and to repeat it at 6 and 12 months. Additional data were passively collected through CBDR. Data from PROBE and CBDR were compared using Kappa agreement, intraclass correlation (ICC) and Pearson correlation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 142 PWH participated. Recruitment ratios were 21.1% and 12.0% for the two phases. Retention rates were 40.8% at 6 months and 32.4% at 12 months. Three hundred thirteen subjects were involved in the comparison between PROBE and CBDR data. The agreement was good to very good (κ > 0.75) or the correlation very strong, with the exception of the history of inhibitor (κ = 0.57), recent bleeds (κ = 0.48) and current treatment regimen (κ = 0.57).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The integration of PROBE with CBDR is feasible and PROBE is a reliable tool for routine PRO data collection. Its use in clinical practice may improve data quality and personalized and patient-centred care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Haemophilia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Haemophilia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Haemophilia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/hae.70117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Feasibility of Administering the Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) Questionnaire Through the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR) and Comparison of Data From the Two Sources.
Introduction: The Patient Reported Outcomes, Burdens and Experiences (PROBE) questionnaire can be used to measure quality of life in persons with haemophilia (PWH) and is integrated in the Canadian Bleeding Disorders Registry (CBDR). This offers the opportunity to compare the same data inputted by patients in PROBE and their treating team in CBDR.
Aim: Our objectives were to assess the feasibility of collecting PROBE data through CBDR and to compare the data collected from these two sources.
Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study among PWH using MyCBDR. Participants were invited to digitally complete the PROBE questionnaire at baseline and to repeat it at 6 and 12 months. Additional data were passively collected through CBDR. Data from PROBE and CBDR were compared using Kappa agreement, intraclass correlation (ICC) and Pearson correlation.
Results: A total of 142 PWH participated. Recruitment ratios were 21.1% and 12.0% for the two phases. Retention rates were 40.8% at 6 months and 32.4% at 12 months. Three hundred thirteen subjects were involved in the comparison between PROBE and CBDR data. The agreement was good to very good (κ > 0.75) or the correlation very strong, with the exception of the history of inhibitor (κ = 0.57), recent bleeds (κ = 0.48) and current treatment regimen (κ = 0.57).
Conclusion: The integration of PROBE with CBDR is feasible and PROBE is a reliable tool for routine PRO data collection. Its use in clinical practice may improve data quality and personalized and patient-centred care.
期刊介绍:
Haemophilia is an international journal dedicated to the exchange of information regarding the comprehensive care of haemophilia. The Journal contains review articles, original scientific papers and case reports related to haemophilia care, with frequent supplements. Subjects covered include:
clotting factor deficiencies, both inherited and acquired: haemophilia A, B, von Willebrand''s disease, deficiencies of factor V, VII, X and XI
replacement therapy for clotting factor deficiencies
component therapy in the developing world
transfusion transmitted disease
haemophilia care and paediatrics, orthopaedics, gynaecology and obstetrics
nursing
laboratory diagnosis
carrier detection
psycho-social concerns
economic issues
audit
inherited platelet disorders.