Henry Saffer, Selen Ozdogan, Michael Grossman, Daniel Dench, Dhaval Dave
{"title":"全面禁止电子烟口味和青少年和成年人的烟草使用。","authors":"Henry Saffer, Selen Ozdogan, Michael Grossman, Daniel Dench, Dhaval Dave","doi":"10.1002/hec.70030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The vast majority of youth e-cigarette users consume flavored e-cigarettes, raising concerns from public health advocates that flavors may drive youth initiation and continued use of e-cigarettes. Flavors drew further notice from the public health community following the sudden outbreak of lung injury among vapers in 2019, prompting several states to enact sweeping bans on flavored e-cigarettes. In this study, we examine the effects of these comprehensive bans on e-cigarette use and potential spillovers into other tobacco use by youth, young adults, and adults. We utilize both standard difference-in-differences (DID) and synthetic DID methods, in conjunction with four national data sets. We find evidence that young adults decrease their use of e-cigarettes by about two to three percentage points, while increasing cigarette use. For youth, there is some suggestive evidence of increasing cigarette use, though these results are undermined by pre-trend differences between treatment and control units. The bans have no effect on e-cigarette and smoking participation among adults 25 and over. Our findings suggest that statewide comprehensive flavor bans may have generated an unintended consequence by encouraging substitution toward traditional smoking in some populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive E-Cigarette Flavor Bans and Tobacco Use Among Youth and Adults.\",\"authors\":\"Henry Saffer, Selen Ozdogan, Michael Grossman, Daniel Dench, Dhaval Dave\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/hec.70030\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The vast majority of youth e-cigarette users consume flavored e-cigarettes, raising concerns from public health advocates that flavors may drive youth initiation and continued use of e-cigarettes. Flavors drew further notice from the public health community following the sudden outbreak of lung injury among vapers in 2019, prompting several states to enact sweeping bans on flavored e-cigarettes. In this study, we examine the effects of these comprehensive bans on e-cigarette use and potential spillovers into other tobacco use by youth, young adults, and adults. We utilize both standard difference-in-differences (DID) and synthetic DID methods, in conjunction with four national data sets. We find evidence that young adults decrease their use of e-cigarettes by about two to three percentage points, while increasing cigarette use. For youth, there is some suggestive evidence of increasing cigarette use, though these results are undermined by pre-trend differences between treatment and control units. The bans have no effect on e-cigarette and smoking participation among adults 25 and over. Our findings suggest that statewide comprehensive flavor bans may have generated an unintended consequence by encouraging substitution toward traditional smoking in some populations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70030\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.70030","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comprehensive E-Cigarette Flavor Bans and Tobacco Use Among Youth and Adults.
The vast majority of youth e-cigarette users consume flavored e-cigarettes, raising concerns from public health advocates that flavors may drive youth initiation and continued use of e-cigarettes. Flavors drew further notice from the public health community following the sudden outbreak of lung injury among vapers in 2019, prompting several states to enact sweeping bans on flavored e-cigarettes. In this study, we examine the effects of these comprehensive bans on e-cigarette use and potential spillovers into other tobacco use by youth, young adults, and adults. We utilize both standard difference-in-differences (DID) and synthetic DID methods, in conjunction with four national data sets. We find evidence that young adults decrease their use of e-cigarettes by about two to three percentage points, while increasing cigarette use. For youth, there is some suggestive evidence of increasing cigarette use, though these results are undermined by pre-trend differences between treatment and control units. The bans have no effect on e-cigarette and smoking participation among adults 25 and over. Our findings suggest that statewide comprehensive flavor bans may have generated an unintended consequence by encouraging substitution toward traditional smoking in some populations.
期刊介绍:
This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems.
Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses.
Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.