偏头痛的疼痛再加工治疗:一个病例系列。

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Headache Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-27 DOI:10.1111/head.15043
Joel N Fishbein, Nathaniel M Schuster, Alpha Anders, Ariel M Portera, Matthew S Herbert
{"title":"偏头痛的疼痛再加工治疗:一个病例系列。","authors":"Joel N Fishbein, Nathaniel M Schuster, Alpha Anders, Ariel M Portera, Matthew S Herbert","doi":"10.1111/head.15043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT) is a behavioral intervention that aims to remediate learned threat associations underlying chronic pain. It has shown efficacy in treating chronic low back pain and was explicitly developed to address a broader range of centrally mediated pain conditions. The focus of PRT on learned threat associations dovetails with emerging neurobiological models of migraine, which highlight learned threat associations-nonharmful internal (e.g., hunger, fatigue) or external (e.g., weather changes) cues that are persistently misinterpreted as danger signals-as a modifiable contributor to migraine pathophysiology. Despite its conceptual relevance, PRT has not yet been studied for migraine, a leading cause of disability with an ongoing need for more effective treatments, especially for patients who are refractory to evidence-based treatments. Addressing this gap, we present the first case series on PRT for migraine. We describe three individuals with chronic migraine who engaged in PRT delivered by a physician. All three patients had inadequate response to standard-of-care preventive and acute migraine treatments and presented with complex clinical histories, including non-headache pain comorbidities. PRT sessions (initial visit 60 min; follow-ups 30 min) focused on two key components: (1) education about neuroplastic pain and its relevance to migraine, and (2) guided instruction and daily practice of somatic tracking. Across all three cases, patients experienced large reductions in headache frequency and clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and functional outcomes. Case 1 improved from 18 to 25 headache days/month to 3, discontinued cannabis use, and canceled planned interventional treatments. Case 2 improved from 30 headache days/month to 5 and reported greater effectiveness and decreased use of acute medication. Case 3 improved from 30 migraine days/month to 3-4, remained off preventive medication, and reported improvement in migraine and comorbid pelvic and abdominal pain. In all cases, the most substantial gains appeared to follow a shift in pain attribution toward a learned threat association model and daily engagement in somatic tracking, consistent with prior literature on PRT in low back pain. This case series is the first to document the use of PRT for migraine and suggests its potential relevance as a mechanistically informed behavioral intervention for migraine. There is now a need to systematically evaluate PRT for migraine in controlled studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12844,"journal":{"name":"Headache","volume":" ","pages":"1660-1665"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pain Reprocessing Therapy for migraine: A case series.\",\"authors\":\"Joel N Fishbein, Nathaniel M Schuster, Alpha Anders, Ariel M Portera, Matthew S Herbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/head.15043\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT) is a behavioral intervention that aims to remediate learned threat associations underlying chronic pain. It has shown efficacy in treating chronic low back pain and was explicitly developed to address a broader range of centrally mediated pain conditions. The focus of PRT on learned threat associations dovetails with emerging neurobiological models of migraine, which highlight learned threat associations-nonharmful internal (e.g., hunger, fatigue) or external (e.g., weather changes) cues that are persistently misinterpreted as danger signals-as a modifiable contributor to migraine pathophysiology. Despite its conceptual relevance, PRT has not yet been studied for migraine, a leading cause of disability with an ongoing need for more effective treatments, especially for patients who are refractory to evidence-based treatments. Addressing this gap, we present the first case series on PRT for migraine. We describe three individuals with chronic migraine who engaged in PRT delivered by a physician. All three patients had inadequate response to standard-of-care preventive and acute migraine treatments and presented with complex clinical histories, including non-headache pain comorbidities. PRT sessions (initial visit 60 min; follow-ups 30 min) focused on two key components: (1) education about neuroplastic pain and its relevance to migraine, and (2) guided instruction and daily practice of somatic tracking. Across all three cases, patients experienced large reductions in headache frequency and clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and functional outcomes. Case 1 improved from 18 to 25 headache days/month to 3, discontinued cannabis use, and canceled planned interventional treatments. Case 2 improved from 30 headache days/month to 5 and reported greater effectiveness and decreased use of acute medication. Case 3 improved from 30 migraine days/month to 3-4, remained off preventive medication, and reported improvement in migraine and comorbid pelvic and abdominal pain. In all cases, the most substantial gains appeared to follow a shift in pain attribution toward a learned threat association model and daily engagement in somatic tracking, consistent with prior literature on PRT in low back pain. This case series is the first to document the use of PRT for migraine and suggests its potential relevance as a mechanistically informed behavioral intervention for migraine. There is now a need to systematically evaluate PRT for migraine in controlled studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12844,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Headache\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1660-1665\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Headache\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15043\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/27 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Headache","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/head.15043","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疼痛再加工治疗(PRT)是一种行为干预,旨在纠正慢性疼痛的习得性威胁关联。它已显示出治疗慢性腰痛的疗效,并明确发展,以解决更广泛的中枢介导的疼痛条件。PRT对习得威胁关联的关注与偏头痛的新兴神经生物学模型相吻合,这些模型强调了习得威胁关联——非有害的内部(如饥饿、疲劳)或外部(如天气变化)线索,这些线索一直被误解为危险信号——作为偏头痛病理生理学的可修改因素。尽管PRT在概念上具有相关性,但它尚未被研究用于偏头痛,这是一种持续需要更有效治疗的主要致残原因,特别是对于难以接受循证治疗的患者。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了第一个关于偏头痛PRT的病例系列。我们描述了三名慢性偏头痛患者,他们参与了由医生提供的PRT。所有三名患者对标准的预防和急性偏头痛治疗反应不足,并表现出复杂的临床病史,包括非头痛合并症。PRT会议(初次访问60分钟,随访30分钟)集中在两个关键组成部分:(1)关于神经可塑性疼痛及其与偏头痛的相关性的教育,(2)指导指导和躯体跟踪的日常实践。在所有三个病例中,患者的头痛频率大大减少,疼痛强度和功能结果有临床意义的改善。病例1头痛天数从18天/月改善到25天/月改善到3天/月,停止使用大麻,并取消计划的介入治疗。病例2从30天/月头痛改善到5天/月,并报告了更大的有效性和减少急性药物的使用。病例3从30天/月偏头痛改善到3-4天/月,停止预防性药物治疗,偏头痛和合并症盆腔和腹部疼痛均有改善。在所有情况下,最显著的收获似乎是随着疼痛归因向习得性威胁关联模型的转变和日常参与躯体追踪,这与先前关于PRT治疗腰痛的文献一致。本病例系列首次记录了PRT治疗偏头痛的使用,并提示其作为偏头痛的机械知情行为干预的潜在相关性。现在有必要在对照研究中系统地评估PRT治疗偏头痛的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Pain Reprocessing Therapy for migraine: A case series.

Pain Reprocessing Therapy (PRT) is a behavioral intervention that aims to remediate learned threat associations underlying chronic pain. It has shown efficacy in treating chronic low back pain and was explicitly developed to address a broader range of centrally mediated pain conditions. The focus of PRT on learned threat associations dovetails with emerging neurobiological models of migraine, which highlight learned threat associations-nonharmful internal (e.g., hunger, fatigue) or external (e.g., weather changes) cues that are persistently misinterpreted as danger signals-as a modifiable contributor to migraine pathophysiology. Despite its conceptual relevance, PRT has not yet been studied for migraine, a leading cause of disability with an ongoing need for more effective treatments, especially for patients who are refractory to evidence-based treatments. Addressing this gap, we present the first case series on PRT for migraine. We describe three individuals with chronic migraine who engaged in PRT delivered by a physician. All three patients had inadequate response to standard-of-care preventive and acute migraine treatments and presented with complex clinical histories, including non-headache pain comorbidities. PRT sessions (initial visit 60 min; follow-ups 30 min) focused on two key components: (1) education about neuroplastic pain and its relevance to migraine, and (2) guided instruction and daily practice of somatic tracking. Across all three cases, patients experienced large reductions in headache frequency and clinically meaningful improvements in pain intensity and functional outcomes. Case 1 improved from 18 to 25 headache days/month to 3, discontinued cannabis use, and canceled planned interventional treatments. Case 2 improved from 30 headache days/month to 5 and reported greater effectiveness and decreased use of acute medication. Case 3 improved from 30 migraine days/month to 3-4, remained off preventive medication, and reported improvement in migraine and comorbid pelvic and abdominal pain. In all cases, the most substantial gains appeared to follow a shift in pain attribution toward a learned threat association model and daily engagement in somatic tracking, consistent with prior literature on PRT in low back pain. This case series is the first to document the use of PRT for migraine and suggests its potential relevance as a mechanistically informed behavioral intervention for migraine. There is now a need to systematically evaluate PRT for migraine in controlled studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Headache
Headache 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
172
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Headache publishes original articles on all aspects of head and face pain including communications on clinical and basic research, diagnosis and management, epidemiology, genetics, and pathophysiology of primary and secondary headaches, cranial neuralgias, and pains referred to the head and face. Monthly issues feature case reports, short communications, review articles, letters to the editor, and news items regarding AHS plus medicolegal and socioeconomic aspects of head pain. This is the official journal of the American Headache Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信