her2阴性早期乳腺癌的患者特征、治疗模式和临床结果与种系BRCA状态有关。

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-22 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2548163
Jay A Andersen, Jagadeswara Rao Earla, Nicole Fulcher, Juliet Ndukum, Nicholas Robert, Mark E Robson, Weiyan Li, Jaime Mejia
{"title":"her2阴性早期乳腺癌的患者特征、治疗模式和临床结果与种系BRCA状态有关。","authors":"Jay A Andersen, Jagadeswara Rao Earla, Nicole Fulcher, Juliet Ndukum, Nicholas Robert, Mark E Robson, Weiyan Li, Jaime Mejia","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2548163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated treatment patterns and survival among patients receiving systemic therapy for HER2- early breast cancer (eBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was used to evaluate gBRCA testing rates; treatment patterns and survival between patients tested positive for <i>gBRCA (gBRCAm)</i> and randomly selected patients with wildtype <i>BRCA (gBRCAwt</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>gBRCA testing rate was 8.2%, and gBRCA mutated rate was 9.8%. Most hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/HER2- patients received adjuvant only treatment, while triple negative breast cancer [TNBC] patients commonly received neoadjuvant only treatment. Among HR+/HER2- patients, 60-month survival was numerically greater for gBRCAwt than gBRCAm. In TNBC patients, gBRCAm ware associated with numerically better invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) compared to gBRCAwt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study survival outcomes among HER2- patients are not significantly different based on gBRCA mutation status, although gBRCAm status is associated with slightly poorer survival. Among patients with structured electronic health record data, the gBRCA testing rate was 8.2%, with a mutation rate of 9.8% among those tested. While these rates reflect under-documentation in electronic health records, they highlight the need for improved capture of genetic testing in real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"2835-2849"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439569/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in HER2-negative early breast cancer by germline BRCA status.\",\"authors\":\"Jay A Andersen, Jagadeswara Rao Earla, Nicole Fulcher, Juliet Ndukum, Nicholas Robert, Mark E Robson, Weiyan Li, Jaime Mejia\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796694.2025.2548163\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study evaluated treatment patterns and survival among patients receiving systemic therapy for HER2- early breast cancer (eBC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective observational cohort study was used to evaluate gBRCA testing rates; treatment patterns and survival between patients tested positive for <i>gBRCA (gBRCAm)</i> and randomly selected patients with wildtype <i>BRCA (gBRCAwt</i>).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>gBRCA testing rate was 8.2%, and gBRCA mutated rate was 9.8%. Most hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/HER2- patients received adjuvant only treatment, while triple negative breast cancer [TNBC] patients commonly received neoadjuvant only treatment. Among HR+/HER2- patients, 60-month survival was numerically greater for gBRCAwt than gBRCAm. In TNBC patients, gBRCAm ware associated with numerically better invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) compared to gBRCAwt.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study survival outcomes among HER2- patients are not significantly different based on gBRCA mutation status, although gBRCAm status is associated with slightly poorer survival. Among patients with structured electronic health record data, the gBRCA testing rate was 8.2%, with a mutation rate of 9.8% among those tested. While these rates reflect under-documentation in electronic health records, they highlight the need for improved capture of genetic testing in real-world settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"2835-2849\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439569/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2548163\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/22 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2548163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究评估了接受全身治疗的HER2-早期乳腺癌(eBC)患者的治疗模式和生存率。方法:采用回顾性观察队列研究评估gBRCA检出率;gBRCA (gBRCAm)阳性患者和随机选择的野生型BRCA (gBRCAwt)患者之间的治疗模式和生存率。结果:gBRCA检测率为8.2%,gBRCA突变率为9.8%。大多数激素受体阳性[HR+]/HER2-患者只接受辅助治疗,而三阴性乳腺癌[TNBC]患者通常只接受新辅助治疗。在HR+/HER2-患者中,gBRCAwt患者的60个月生存率高于gBRCAm患者。在TNBC患者中,与gBRCAwt相比,gBRCAm具有更好的侵袭性无病生存(IDFS)和远端无病生存(DDFS)。结论:研究中HER2-患者的生存结果与gBRCA突变状态无显著差异,尽管gBRCAm状态与稍差的生存相关。在结构化电子病历数据的患者中,gBRCA检测率为8.2%,突变率为9.8%。虽然这些比率反映了电子健康记录的记录不足,但它们强调了在现实环境中改进基因检测捕获的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and clinical outcomes in HER2-negative early breast cancer by germline BRCA status.

Introduction: This study evaluated treatment patterns and survival among patients receiving systemic therapy for HER2- early breast cancer (eBC).

Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was used to evaluate gBRCA testing rates; treatment patterns and survival between patients tested positive for gBRCA (gBRCAm) and randomly selected patients with wildtype BRCA (gBRCAwt).

Results: gBRCA testing rate was 8.2%, and gBRCA mutated rate was 9.8%. Most hormone receptor-positive [HR+]/HER2- patients received adjuvant only treatment, while triple negative breast cancer [TNBC] patients commonly received neoadjuvant only treatment. Among HR+/HER2- patients, 60-month survival was numerically greater for gBRCAwt than gBRCAm. In TNBC patients, gBRCAm ware associated with numerically better invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) and distant disease-free survival (DDFS) compared to gBRCAwt.

Conclusions: The study survival outcomes among HER2- patients are not significantly different based on gBRCA mutation status, although gBRCAm status is associated with slightly poorer survival. Among patients with structured electronic health record data, the gBRCA testing rate was 8.2%, with a mutation rate of 9.8% among those tested. While these rates reflect under-documentation in electronic health records, they highlight the need for improved capture of genetic testing in real-world settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future oncology
Future oncology ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.00%
发文量
335
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信