群体特异性判别分析增强了对脑功能网络侧化的性别差异的检测。

IF 11.8 2区 生物学 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Shuo Zhou, Junhao Luo, Yaya Jiang, Haolin Wang, Haiping Lu, Gaolang Gong
{"title":"群体特异性判别分析增强了对脑功能网络侧化的性别差异的检测。","authors":"Shuo Zhou, Junhao Luo, Yaya Jiang, Haolin Wang, Haiping Lu, Gaolang Gong","doi":"10.1093/gigascience/giaf082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateralization is the asymmetry in function and cognition between the brain hemispheres, with notable sex differences. Conventional neuroscience studies on lateralization use univariate statistical comparisons between male and female groups, with limited and ineffective validation for group specificity. This article proposes to model sex differences in brain functional network lateralization as a dual-classification problem: first-order classification of left versus right hemispheres and second-order classification of male versus female models. To capture sex-specific patterns, we developed an interpretable group-specific discriminant analysis (GSDA) for first-order classification, followed by logistic regression for second-order classification.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Evaluations on 2 large-scale neuroimaging datasets show GSDA's effectiveness in learning sex-specific patterns, significantly improving model group specificity over baseline methods. Major sex differences were identified in the strength of lateralization and interaction patterns within and between lobes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GSDA-based analysis challenges the conventional approach to investigating group-specific lateralization and indicates that previous findings on sex-specific lateralization will need revisits and revalidation. This method is generic and can be adapted for other group-specific analyses, such as treatment-specific or disease-specific studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":12581,"journal":{"name":"GigaScience","volume":"14 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":11.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398281/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Group-specific discriminant analysis enhances detection of sex differences in brain functional network lateralization.\",\"authors\":\"Shuo Zhou, Junhao Luo, Yaya Jiang, Haolin Wang, Haiping Lu, Gaolang Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/gigascience/giaf082\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lateralization is the asymmetry in function and cognition between the brain hemispheres, with notable sex differences. Conventional neuroscience studies on lateralization use univariate statistical comparisons between male and female groups, with limited and ineffective validation for group specificity. This article proposes to model sex differences in brain functional network lateralization as a dual-classification problem: first-order classification of left versus right hemispheres and second-order classification of male versus female models. To capture sex-specific patterns, we developed an interpretable group-specific discriminant analysis (GSDA) for first-order classification, followed by logistic regression for second-order classification.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Evaluations on 2 large-scale neuroimaging datasets show GSDA's effectiveness in learning sex-specific patterns, significantly improving model group specificity over baseline methods. Major sex differences were identified in the strength of lateralization and interaction patterns within and between lobes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The GSDA-based analysis challenges the conventional approach to investigating group-specific lateralization and indicates that previous findings on sex-specific lateralization will need revisits and revalidation. This method is generic and can be adapted for other group-specific analyses, such as treatment-specific or disease-specific studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12581,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"GigaScience\",\"volume\":\"14 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":11.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12398281/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"GigaScience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf082\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"GigaScience","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giaf082","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:侧化是大脑两个半球在功能和认知上的不对称,具有显著的性别差异。关于侧化的传统神经科学研究使用男性和女性组之间的单变量统计比较,对组特异性的验证有限且无效。本文提出将脑功能网络侧化的性别差异建模为双重分类问题:左半球和右半球的一级分类和男性和女性模型的二级分类。为了捕获性别特异性模式,我们开发了一种可解释的群体特异性判别分析(GSDA)用于一级分类,然后使用逻辑回归进行二级分类。结果:对2个大型神经成像数据集的评估显示,GSDA在学习性别特异性模式方面的有效性,与基线方法相比,显著提高了模型组的特异性。主要的性别差异被确定在侧化的强度和相互作用模式内和叶之间。结论:基于gsda的分析挑战了研究群体特异性侧化的传统方法,并表明先前关于性别特异性侧化的研究结果需要重新审视和重新验证。这种方法是通用的,可适用于其他群体特异性分析,如治疗特异性或疾病特异性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Group-specific discriminant analysis enhances detection of sex differences in brain functional network lateralization.

Background: Lateralization is the asymmetry in function and cognition between the brain hemispheres, with notable sex differences. Conventional neuroscience studies on lateralization use univariate statistical comparisons between male and female groups, with limited and ineffective validation for group specificity. This article proposes to model sex differences in brain functional network lateralization as a dual-classification problem: first-order classification of left versus right hemispheres and second-order classification of male versus female models. To capture sex-specific patterns, we developed an interpretable group-specific discriminant analysis (GSDA) for first-order classification, followed by logistic regression for second-order classification.

Findings: Evaluations on 2 large-scale neuroimaging datasets show GSDA's effectiveness in learning sex-specific patterns, significantly improving model group specificity over baseline methods. Major sex differences were identified in the strength of lateralization and interaction patterns within and between lobes.

Conclusions: The GSDA-based analysis challenges the conventional approach to investigating group-specific lateralization and indicates that previous findings on sex-specific lateralization will need revisits and revalidation. This method is generic and can be adapted for other group-specific analyses, such as treatment-specific or disease-specific studies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
GigaScience
GigaScience MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
1.10%
发文量
119
审稿时长
1 weeks
期刊介绍: GigaScience seeks to transform data dissemination and utilization in the life and biomedical sciences. As an online open-access open-data journal, it specializes in publishing "big-data" studies encompassing various fields. Its scope includes not only "omic" type data and the fields of high-throughput biology currently serviced by large public repositories, but also the growing range of more difficult-to-access data, such as imaging, neuroscience, ecology, cohort data, systems biology and other new types of large-scale shareable data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信