Joseph McCambridge, Fiyinfoluwa Fabamwo, Shadia Taha, Dermot McCaffrey, Matthew Barrett, Ciara Mahon, Kenneth McDonald
{"title":"在门诊加重心衰的管理和结果的前瞻性分析。","authors":"Joseph McCambridge, Fiyinfoluwa Fabamwo, Shadia Taha, Dermot McCaffrey, Matthew Barrett, Ciara Mahon, Kenneth McDonald","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is growing recognition of the burden and prognostic significance of WHF treated in the outpatient setting. However, there is currently a lack of prospective real-world data in this area of HF care. This study aims to analyse the natural history of outpatient WHF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This is a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated for WHF in our ambulatory HF clinic from August 2022 to March 2024. The diagnosis of WHF was made according to two definitions. The first required meeting strict pre-specified diagnostic criteria. The second included patients not meeting these diagnostic criteria but deemed to have WHF by a senior cardiologist. All patients required escalation in diuretic therapy (oral and/or intravenous) for inclusion. Clinical endpoints included outcomes from the presenting WHF episode and over the subsequent 3 months. Of the 234 patients treated for outpatient WHF, stabilisation was achieved in 78.6% (184) with 16.2% (38) requiring HF hospitalisation. A further 3.4% (8) experienced non-HF-related admissions, 2 (0.9%) patients died without hospitalisation and 2 (0.9%) patients requested follow up in other units for geographic ease. Bailout therapies (oral metolazone and/or IV loop diuretic) were used in 45.3% (106), and adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in this group than among those treated with oral loop diuretic only (35.8%, 38/106 and 9.4%, 12/128 respectively; odds ratio 7.24, P < 0.001). Of those who initially stabilised, 24.5% (45/184) had recurrent outpatient WHF during the subsequent 3-month period of follow-up, and 4.9% (9/184) were hospitalised for HF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient WHF was successfully treated in the majority of patients in the community. However, despite initial stabilisation, there is a persistent risk of recurrent deterioration. This may reflect challenges in defining stability clinically in HF patients. Biologic markers of stability and closer follow-up may help to address this challenge and improve outlook for this at-risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective analysis of management and outcomes of worsening heart failure in the outpatient setting.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph McCambridge, Fiyinfoluwa Fabamwo, Shadia Taha, Dermot McCaffrey, Matthew Barrett, Ciara Mahon, Kenneth McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is growing recognition of the burden and prognostic significance of WHF treated in the outpatient setting. However, there is currently a lack of prospective real-world data in this area of HF care. This study aims to analyse the natural history of outpatient WHF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This is a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated for WHF in our ambulatory HF clinic from August 2022 to March 2024. The diagnosis of WHF was made according to two definitions. The first required meeting strict pre-specified diagnostic criteria. The second included patients not meeting these diagnostic criteria but deemed to have WHF by a senior cardiologist. All patients required escalation in diuretic therapy (oral and/or intravenous) for inclusion. Clinical endpoints included outcomes from the presenting WHF episode and over the subsequent 3 months. Of the 234 patients treated for outpatient WHF, stabilisation was achieved in 78.6% (184) with 16.2% (38) requiring HF hospitalisation. A further 3.4% (8) experienced non-HF-related admissions, 2 (0.9%) patients died without hospitalisation and 2 (0.9%) patients requested follow up in other units for geographic ease. Bailout therapies (oral metolazone and/or IV loop diuretic) were used in 45.3% (106), and adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in this group than among those treated with oral loop diuretic only (35.8%, 38/106 and 9.4%, 12/128 respectively; odds ratio 7.24, P < 0.001). Of those who initially stabilised, 24.5% (45/184) had recurrent outpatient WHF during the subsequent 3-month period of follow-up, and 4.9% (9/184) were hospitalised for HF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient WHF was successfully treated in the majority of patients in the community. However, despite initial stabilisation, there is a persistent risk of recurrent deterioration. This may reflect challenges in defining stability clinically in HF patients. Biologic markers of stability and closer follow-up may help to address this challenge and improve outlook for this at-risk group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15400\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
A prospective analysis of management and outcomes of worsening heart failure in the outpatient setting.
Aims: There is growing recognition of the burden and prognostic significance of WHF treated in the outpatient setting. However, there is currently a lack of prospective real-world data in this area of HF care. This study aims to analyse the natural history of outpatient WHF.
Methods and results: This is a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated for WHF in our ambulatory HF clinic from August 2022 to March 2024. The diagnosis of WHF was made according to two definitions. The first required meeting strict pre-specified diagnostic criteria. The second included patients not meeting these diagnostic criteria but deemed to have WHF by a senior cardiologist. All patients required escalation in diuretic therapy (oral and/or intravenous) for inclusion. Clinical endpoints included outcomes from the presenting WHF episode and over the subsequent 3 months. Of the 234 patients treated for outpatient WHF, stabilisation was achieved in 78.6% (184) with 16.2% (38) requiring HF hospitalisation. A further 3.4% (8) experienced non-HF-related admissions, 2 (0.9%) patients died without hospitalisation and 2 (0.9%) patients requested follow up in other units for geographic ease. Bailout therapies (oral metolazone and/or IV loop diuretic) were used in 45.3% (106), and adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in this group than among those treated with oral loop diuretic only (35.8%, 38/106 and 9.4%, 12/128 respectively; odds ratio 7.24, P < 0.001). Of those who initially stabilised, 24.5% (45/184) had recurrent outpatient WHF during the subsequent 3-month period of follow-up, and 4.9% (9/184) were hospitalised for HF.
Conclusions: Outpatient WHF was successfully treated in the majority of patients in the community. However, despite initial stabilisation, there is a persistent risk of recurrent deterioration. This may reflect challenges in defining stability clinically in HF patients. Biologic markers of stability and closer follow-up may help to address this challenge and improve outlook for this at-risk group.
期刊介绍:
ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.