在门诊加重心衰的管理和结果的前瞻性分析。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Joseph McCambridge, Fiyinfoluwa Fabamwo, Shadia Taha, Dermot McCaffrey, Matthew Barrett, Ciara Mahon, Kenneth McDonald
{"title":"在门诊加重心衰的管理和结果的前瞻性分析。","authors":"Joseph McCambridge, Fiyinfoluwa Fabamwo, Shadia Taha, Dermot McCaffrey, Matthew Barrett, Ciara Mahon, Kenneth McDonald","doi":"10.1002/ehf2.15400","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is growing recognition of the burden and prognostic significance of WHF treated in the outpatient setting. However, there is currently a lack of prospective real-world data in this area of HF care. This study aims to analyse the natural history of outpatient WHF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This is a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated for WHF in our ambulatory HF clinic from August 2022 to March 2024. The diagnosis of WHF was made according to two definitions. The first required meeting strict pre-specified diagnostic criteria. The second included patients not meeting these diagnostic criteria but deemed to have WHF by a senior cardiologist. All patients required escalation in diuretic therapy (oral and/or intravenous) for inclusion. Clinical endpoints included outcomes from the presenting WHF episode and over the subsequent 3 months. Of the 234 patients treated for outpatient WHF, stabilisation was achieved in 78.6% (184) with 16.2% (38) requiring HF hospitalisation. A further 3.4% (8) experienced non-HF-related admissions, 2 (0.9%) patients died without hospitalisation and 2 (0.9%) patients requested follow up in other units for geographic ease. Bailout therapies (oral metolazone and/or IV loop diuretic) were used in 45.3% (106), and adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in this group than among those treated with oral loop diuretic only (35.8%, 38/106 and 9.4%, 12/128 respectively; odds ratio 7.24, P < 0.001). Of those who initially stabilised, 24.5% (45/184) had recurrent outpatient WHF during the subsequent 3-month period of follow-up, and 4.9% (9/184) were hospitalised for HF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient WHF was successfully treated in the majority of patients in the community. However, despite initial stabilisation, there is a persistent risk of recurrent deterioration. This may reflect challenges in defining stability clinically in HF patients. Biologic markers of stability and closer follow-up may help to address this challenge and improve outlook for this at-risk group.</p>","PeriodicalId":11864,"journal":{"name":"ESC Heart Failure","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A prospective analysis of management and outcomes of worsening heart failure in the outpatient setting.\",\"authors\":\"Joseph McCambridge, Fiyinfoluwa Fabamwo, Shadia Taha, Dermot McCaffrey, Matthew Barrett, Ciara Mahon, Kenneth McDonald\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ehf2.15400\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>There is growing recognition of the burden and prognostic significance of WHF treated in the outpatient setting. However, there is currently a lack of prospective real-world data in this area of HF care. This study aims to analyse the natural history of outpatient WHF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>This is a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated for WHF in our ambulatory HF clinic from August 2022 to March 2024. The diagnosis of WHF was made according to two definitions. The first required meeting strict pre-specified diagnostic criteria. The second included patients not meeting these diagnostic criteria but deemed to have WHF by a senior cardiologist. All patients required escalation in diuretic therapy (oral and/or intravenous) for inclusion. Clinical endpoints included outcomes from the presenting WHF episode and over the subsequent 3 months. Of the 234 patients treated for outpatient WHF, stabilisation was achieved in 78.6% (184) with 16.2% (38) requiring HF hospitalisation. A further 3.4% (8) experienced non-HF-related admissions, 2 (0.9%) patients died without hospitalisation and 2 (0.9%) patients requested follow up in other units for geographic ease. Bailout therapies (oral metolazone and/or IV loop diuretic) were used in 45.3% (106), and adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in this group than among those treated with oral loop diuretic only (35.8%, 38/106 and 9.4%, 12/128 respectively; odds ratio 7.24, P < 0.001). Of those who initially stabilised, 24.5% (45/184) had recurrent outpatient WHF during the subsequent 3-month period of follow-up, and 4.9% (9/184) were hospitalised for HF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Outpatient WHF was successfully treated in the majority of patients in the community. However, despite initial stabilisation, there is a persistent risk of recurrent deterioration. This may reflect challenges in defining stability clinically in HF patients. Biologic markers of stability and closer follow-up may help to address this challenge and improve outlook for this at-risk group.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ESC Heart Failure\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15400\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ESC Heart Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.15400","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:越来越多的人认识到在门诊治疗WHF的负担和预后意义。然而,目前在心衰护理这一领域缺乏前瞻性的真实数据。本研究旨在分析门诊WHF的自然病史。方法和结果:这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,研究对象是2022年8月至2024年3月在我们的心衰门诊连续接受WHF治疗的患者。WHF的诊断依据两种定义。第一种需要满足严格的预先指定的诊断标准。第二组包括不符合这些诊断标准但被高级心脏病专家认为患有WHF的患者。所有患者都需要增加利尿剂治疗(口服和/或静脉注射)。临床终点包括出现WHF发作和随后3个月的结果。在接受门诊WHF治疗的234例患者中,78.6%(184例)患者病情稳定,16.2%(38例)患者需要住院治疗。另有3.4%(8)的患者与hf无关,2例(0.9%)患者在没有住院治疗的情况下死亡,2例(0.9%)患者要求在其他单位进行随访。45.3%(106)的患者采用紧急治疗(口服美托酮和/或静脉利尿剂),该组不良临床结局明显高于单纯口服利尿剂组(分别为35.8%(38/106)和9.4%(12/128),优势比为7.24,P。结论:社区门诊WHF患者多数获得成功治疗。然而,尽管初步稳定,仍存在复发性恶化的持续风险。这可能反映了在临床上定义心衰患者稳定性的挑战。稳定性的生物标志物和更密切的随访可能有助于应对这一挑战,并改善这一高危群体的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A prospective analysis of management and outcomes of worsening heart failure in the outpatient setting.

Aims: There is growing recognition of the burden and prognostic significance of WHF treated in the outpatient setting. However, there is currently a lack of prospective real-world data in this area of HF care. This study aims to analyse the natural history of outpatient WHF.

Methods and results: This is a prospective, observational study of consecutive patients treated for WHF in our ambulatory HF clinic from August 2022 to March 2024. The diagnosis of WHF was made according to two definitions. The first required meeting strict pre-specified diagnostic criteria. The second included patients not meeting these diagnostic criteria but deemed to have WHF by a senior cardiologist. All patients required escalation in diuretic therapy (oral and/or intravenous) for inclusion. Clinical endpoints included outcomes from the presenting WHF episode and over the subsequent 3 months. Of the 234 patients treated for outpatient WHF, stabilisation was achieved in 78.6% (184) with 16.2% (38) requiring HF hospitalisation. A further 3.4% (8) experienced non-HF-related admissions, 2 (0.9%) patients died without hospitalisation and 2 (0.9%) patients requested follow up in other units for geographic ease. Bailout therapies (oral metolazone and/or IV loop diuretic) were used in 45.3% (106), and adverse clinical outcomes were significantly higher in this group than among those treated with oral loop diuretic only (35.8%, 38/106 and 9.4%, 12/128 respectively; odds ratio 7.24, P < 0.001). Of those who initially stabilised, 24.5% (45/184) had recurrent outpatient WHF during the subsequent 3-month period of follow-up, and 4.9% (9/184) were hospitalised for HF.

Conclusions: Outpatient WHF was successfully treated in the majority of patients in the community. However, despite initial stabilisation, there is a persistent risk of recurrent deterioration. This may reflect challenges in defining stability clinically in HF patients. Biologic markers of stability and closer follow-up may help to address this challenge and improve outlook for this at-risk group.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ESC Heart Failure
ESC Heart Failure Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
7.90%
发文量
461
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: ESC Heart Failure is the open access journal of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology dedicated to the advancement of knowledge in the field of heart failure. The journal aims to improve the understanding, prevention, investigation and treatment of heart failure. Molecular and cellular biology, pathology, physiology, electrophysiology, pharmacology, as well as the clinical, social and population sciences all form part of the discipline that is heart failure. Accordingly, submission of manuscripts on basic, translational, clinical and population sciences is invited. Original contributions on nursing, care of the elderly, primary care, health economics and other specialist fields related to heart failure are also welcome, as are case reports that highlight interesting aspects of heart failure care and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信