吸入一氧化氮治疗COVID-19:一项开放标签、平行、随机对照试验

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
ERJ Open Research Pub Date : 2025-08-26 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1183/23120541.00006-2024
Frederico Friedrich, Marcelo Cypel, Vinicius Schenk Michaelsen, Marcos Otávio Antunes Brum, Fabiano Ramos, Roberta Marco, Gustavo Chatkin, Lucas Kich Grun, Letícya Simone Melo Dos Santos, Amanda Paz Santos, Morgana Thaís Carollo Fernandes, Luciana Medeiros Paungartner, Marcelo Scheffer Maranghello, Caroline Lantmann, Gustavo Eggers, Gustavo Duenhas Sanches, Daniel Marinowic, Regis Goulart Rosa, Florencia María Barbé-Tuana, Marcus Herbert Jones
{"title":"吸入一氧化氮治疗COVID-19:一项开放标签、平行、随机对照试验","authors":"Frederico Friedrich, Marcelo Cypel, Vinicius Schenk Michaelsen, Marcos Otávio Antunes Brum, Fabiano Ramos, Roberta Marco, Gustavo Chatkin, Lucas Kich Grun, Letícya Simone Melo Dos Santos, Amanda Paz Santos, Morgana Thaís Carollo Fernandes, Luciana Medeiros Paungartner, Marcelo Scheffer Maranghello, Caroline Lantmann, Gustavo Eggers, Gustavo Duenhas Sanches, Daniel Marinowic, Regis Goulart Rosa, Florencia María Barbé-Tuana, Marcus Herbert Jones","doi":"10.1183/23120541.00006-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in high concentration inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in epithelial cells and may prevent severe disease in hospitalised patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of iNO 160 ppm on supplemental oxygen in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an open-label, randomised clinical trial in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive iNO for 6 h in addition to standard of care. The primary safety end-point was assessed by incidence of adverse events. The secondary efficacy end-point was the number of days free of supplemental oxygen within 15 days after randomisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>55 patients were enrolled, 27 in the iNO group and 27 in the control group, and one patient was excluded. No adverse events occurred with the inhalation of nitric oxide. Median (IQR) number of days free of supplemental oxygen was 11 (8.0-13.0) in the iNO group and 8 (2.5-10.5) in the control group (p=0.044). The iNO group had a shorter length of hospital stay (4.5 days (3.0-6.3) compared to 7.0 days (6.0-10.0) in the control group; p=0.004). Clinical score was lower in the iNO group on days 3 and 5 (p=0.010 and p=0.033). The number of patients weaned from ventilatory support on day 3 was higher in the iNO group (n=9 (33%)) when compared to controls (n=1 (4%)); p=0.005. Respiratory failure and mortality did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The iNO treatment was well tolerated and safe. Among adults hospitalised for COVID-19, iNO 160 ppm for 6 h increased the number of days free from supplemental oxygen, shortened the days of ventilatory support and the length of hospital stay, and improved the clinical score.</p>","PeriodicalId":11739,"journal":{"name":"ERJ Open Research","volume":"11 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of COVID-19: an open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Frederico Friedrich, Marcelo Cypel, Vinicius Schenk Michaelsen, Marcos Otávio Antunes Brum, Fabiano Ramos, Roberta Marco, Gustavo Chatkin, Lucas Kich Grun, Letícya Simone Melo Dos Santos, Amanda Paz Santos, Morgana Thaís Carollo Fernandes, Luciana Medeiros Paungartner, Marcelo Scheffer Maranghello, Caroline Lantmann, Gustavo Eggers, Gustavo Duenhas Sanches, Daniel Marinowic, Regis Goulart Rosa, Florencia María Barbé-Tuana, Marcus Herbert Jones\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/23120541.00006-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in high concentration inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in epithelial cells and may prevent severe disease in hospitalised patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of iNO 160 ppm on supplemental oxygen in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an open-label, randomised clinical trial in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive iNO for 6 h in addition to standard of care. The primary safety end-point was assessed by incidence of adverse events. The secondary efficacy end-point was the number of days free of supplemental oxygen within 15 days after randomisation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>55 patients were enrolled, 27 in the iNO group and 27 in the control group, and one patient was excluded. No adverse events occurred with the inhalation of nitric oxide. Median (IQR) number of days free of supplemental oxygen was 11 (8.0-13.0) in the iNO group and 8 (2.5-10.5) in the control group (p=0.044). The iNO group had a shorter length of hospital stay (4.5 days (3.0-6.3) compared to 7.0 days (6.0-10.0) in the control group; p=0.004). Clinical score was lower in the iNO group on days 3 and 5 (p=0.010 and p=0.033). The number of patients weaned from ventilatory support on day 3 was higher in the iNO group (n=9 (33%)) when compared to controls (n=1 (4%)); p=0.005. Respiratory failure and mortality did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The iNO treatment was well tolerated and safe. Among adults hospitalised for COVID-19, iNO 160 ppm for 6 h increased the number of days free from supplemental oxygen, shortened the days of ventilatory support and the length of hospital stay, and improved the clinical score.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11739,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"volume\":\"11 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12378598/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERJ Open Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00006-2024\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERJ Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/23120541.00006-2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:高浓度吸入一氧化氮(no)可抑制SARS-CoV-2在上皮细胞中的复制,可能预防住院患者的严重疾病。本研究的目的是评估新冠肺炎住院患者补充氧气160 ppm的安全性和有效性。方法:我们在COVID-19住院患者中进行了一项开放标签、随机临床试验。在标准治疗的基础上,随机分配患者接受6小时的iNO治疗。主要安全终点是通过不良事件的发生率来评估的。次要疗效终点是随机分组后15天内无补充氧的天数。结果:共纳入55例患者,其中iNO组27例,对照组27例,排除1例。吸入一氧化氮未发生不良事件。无氧组的中位(IQR)无氧天数为11天(8.0 ~ 13.0),对照组为8天(2.5 ~ 10.5)(p=0.044)。与对照组的7.0天(6.0-10.0)相比,iNO组的住院时间较短(4.5天(3.0-6.3));p = 0.004)。iNO组临床评分在第3天和第5天较低(p=0.010和p=0.033)。与对照组(n=1(4%))相比,iNO组在第3天脱离呼吸支持的患者人数(n=9(33%))较高;p = 0.005。呼吸衰竭和死亡率在两组之间没有差异。结论:iNO治疗具有良好的耐受性和安全性。在因COVID-19住院的成人中,添加160 ppm的一氧化氮6 h可增加无需补充氧气的天数,缩短呼吸支持天数和住院时间,并提高临床评分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of COVID-19: an open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial.

Inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of COVID-19: an open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial.

Inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of COVID-19: an open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial.

Inhaled nitric oxide for the treatment of COVID-19: an open-label, parallel, randomised controlled trial.

Background: Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) in high concentration inhibits SARS-CoV-2 replication in epithelial cells and may prevent severe disease in hospitalised patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of iNO 160 ppm on supplemental oxygen in patients hospitalised with COVID-19.

Methods: We conducted an open-label, randomised clinical trial in hospitalised patients with COVID-19 receiving supplemental oxygen. Patients were randomly assigned to receive iNO for 6 h in addition to standard of care. The primary safety end-point was assessed by incidence of adverse events. The secondary efficacy end-point was the number of days free of supplemental oxygen within 15 days after randomisation.

Results: 55 patients were enrolled, 27 in the iNO group and 27 in the control group, and one patient was excluded. No adverse events occurred with the inhalation of nitric oxide. Median (IQR) number of days free of supplemental oxygen was 11 (8.0-13.0) in the iNO group and 8 (2.5-10.5) in the control group (p=0.044). The iNO group had a shorter length of hospital stay (4.5 days (3.0-6.3) compared to 7.0 days (6.0-10.0) in the control group; p=0.004). Clinical score was lower in the iNO group on days 3 and 5 (p=0.010 and p=0.033). The number of patients weaned from ventilatory support on day 3 was higher in the iNO group (n=9 (33%)) when compared to controls (n=1 (4%)); p=0.005. Respiratory failure and mortality did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion: The iNO treatment was well tolerated and safe. Among adults hospitalised for COVID-19, iNO 160 ppm for 6 h increased the number of days free from supplemental oxygen, shortened the days of ventilatory support and the length of hospital stay, and improved the clinical score.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ERJ Open Research
ERJ Open Research Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.30%
发文量
273
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: ERJ Open Research is a fully open access original research journal, published online by the European Respiratory Society. The journal aims to publish high-quality work in all fields of respiratory science and medicine, covering basic science, clinical translational science and clinical medicine. The journal was created to help fulfil the ERS objective to disseminate scientific and educational material to its members and to the medical community, but also to provide researchers with an affordable open access specialty journal in which to publish their work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信