{"title":"转诊信和诊断错误之间的关系:日本普通内科的单中心横断面研究。","authors":"Sakura Kamiya, Toshinori Nishizawa, Hiroki Ozawa, Yukinori Harada, Takashi Watari, Taro Shimizu, Madoka Sakurai, Yuya Suzuki, Gautam A Deshpande, Hiroko Arioka","doi":"10.1515/dx-2024-0197","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Referral documentation may either contribute to diagnostic excellence or play a role in diagnostic errors (DEs), but its exact impact remains unclear. This study investigates the association between referral documentation and DEs among patients initially evaluated by another hospital or department and subsequently referred to the general internal medicine (GIM) outpatient clinic of an acute care tertiary hospital in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed outpatients who visited the GIM outpatient clinic between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Patients initially evaluated at another medical facility or department, who then visited the GIM outpatient clinic, and were subsequently readmitted unexpectedly within 14 days after GIM outpatient clinic visit were included. DEs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument. Errors were analyzed using the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between referral letters and DEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 80 patients, 29 (36.3 %) experienced DEs. Referral letters were present for 52 (65.0 %) patients. The proportion of DEs was lower in the referred patients compared to non-referred patients (25.0 vs. 57.1 %; p-value=0.004). After adjusting for age, sex, race, multimorbidity, type of previous physicians, and post-graduate year of the GIM physician, the presence of a referral letter was associated with a substantially likelihood of DEs (OR=0.20, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p-value=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of a referral letter facilitates accurate diagnoses while markedly reducing DEs. Healthcare systems should consider promoting the proper use of referral systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association between referral letters and diagnostic errors: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine in Japan.\",\"authors\":\"Sakura Kamiya, Toshinori Nishizawa, Hiroki Ozawa, Yukinori Harada, Takashi Watari, Taro Shimizu, Madoka Sakurai, Yuya Suzuki, Gautam A Deshpande, Hiroko Arioka\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/dx-2024-0197\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Referral documentation may either contribute to diagnostic excellence or play a role in diagnostic errors (DEs), but its exact impact remains unclear. This study investigates the association between referral documentation and DEs among patients initially evaluated by another hospital or department and subsequently referred to the general internal medicine (GIM) outpatient clinic of an acute care tertiary hospital in Japan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study analyzed outpatients who visited the GIM outpatient clinic between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Patients initially evaluated at another medical facility or department, who then visited the GIM outpatient clinic, and were subsequently readmitted unexpectedly within 14 days after GIM outpatient clinic visit were included. DEs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument. Errors were analyzed using the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between referral letters and DEs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 80 patients, 29 (36.3 %) experienced DEs. Referral letters were present for 52 (65.0 %) patients. The proportion of DEs was lower in the referred patients compared to non-referred patients (25.0 vs. 57.1 %; p-value=0.004). After adjusting for age, sex, race, multimorbidity, type of previous physicians, and post-graduate year of the GIM physician, the presence of a referral letter was associated with a substantially likelihood of DEs (OR=0.20, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p-value=0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The presence of a referral letter facilitates accurate diagnoses while markedly reducing DEs. Healthcare systems should consider promoting the proper use of referral systems.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11273,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Diagnosis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Diagnosis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0197\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2024-0197","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association between referral letters and diagnostic errors: a single-center, cross-sectional study in general internal medicine in Japan.
Objectives: Referral documentation may either contribute to diagnostic excellence or play a role in diagnostic errors (DEs), but its exact impact remains unclear. This study investigates the association between referral documentation and DEs among patients initially evaluated by another hospital or department and subsequently referred to the general internal medicine (GIM) outpatient clinic of an acute care tertiary hospital in Japan.
Methods: This cross-sectional study analyzed outpatients who visited the GIM outpatient clinic between April 1, 2017 and March 31, 2023. Patients initially evaluated at another medical facility or department, who then visited the GIM outpatient clinic, and were subsequently readmitted unexpectedly within 14 days after GIM outpatient clinic visit were included. DEs were identified using the Revised Safer Dx Instrument. Errors were analyzed using the Diagnostic Error Evaluation and Research (DEER) taxonomy. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess the relationship between referral letters and DEs.
Results: Of 80 patients, 29 (36.3 %) experienced DEs. Referral letters were present for 52 (65.0 %) patients. The proportion of DEs was lower in the referred patients compared to non-referred patients (25.0 vs. 57.1 %; p-value=0.004). After adjusting for age, sex, race, multimorbidity, type of previous physicians, and post-graduate year of the GIM physician, the presence of a referral letter was associated with a substantially likelihood of DEs (OR=0.20, 95 % CI: 0.06-0.62, p-value=0.005).
Conclusions: The presence of a referral letter facilitates accurate diagnoses while markedly reducing DEs. Healthcare systems should consider promoting the proper use of referral systems.
期刊介绍:
Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality. Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error