两种氯地平制剂在中国健康受试者中的生物等效性比较研究:单剂量、2期交叉试验

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Zhuo Chen, Fengshan Li, Qin Yu, Shiyin Feng, Linrui Cai, Feng Hu, Chunfeng Du, Xiaohong Liu
{"title":"两种氯地平制剂在中国健康受试者中的生物等效性比较研究:单剂量、2期交叉试验","authors":"Zhuo Chen, Fengshan Li, Qin Yu, Shiyin Feng, Linrui Cai, Feng Hu, Chunfeng Du, Xiaohong Liu","doi":"10.1002/cpdd.1591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Clevidipine emulsion is an intravenous antihypertensive agent indicated for acute blood pressure control when oral therapies are contraindicated or ineffective. To address this gap in availability, a randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover trial was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a generic clevidipine emulsion versus the reference product in 32 healthy Chinese adults. Participants received a 30-minute intravenous infusion of 3 mg of clevidipine (test or reference formulation) in each study period, with serial blood samples collected from the contralateral arm relative to the infusion site for pharmacokinetic analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored throughout the study. All participants completed both treatment phases. The generic formulation satisfied bioequivalence criteria for all primary pharmacokinetic parameters, with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> fully contained within the 80%-125% equivalence range. Three participants (9.4%) experienced mild TEAEs assessed as treatment-related, including transient sinus tachycardia (n = 2) and asymptomatic alanine aminotransferase elevation (n = 1). The generic formulation met bioequivalence criteria and exhibited comparable safety profiles to the reference product.</p>","PeriodicalId":10495,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Bioequivalence Study of 2 Clevidipine Formulations in Healthy Chinese participants: A Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Zhuo Chen, Fengshan Li, Qin Yu, Shiyin Feng, Linrui Cai, Feng Hu, Chunfeng Du, Xiaohong Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cpdd.1591\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Clevidipine emulsion is an intravenous antihypertensive agent indicated for acute blood pressure control when oral therapies are contraindicated or ineffective. To address this gap in availability, a randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover trial was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a generic clevidipine emulsion versus the reference product in 32 healthy Chinese adults. Participants received a 30-minute intravenous infusion of 3 mg of clevidipine (test or reference formulation) in each study period, with serial blood samples collected from the contralateral arm relative to the infusion site for pharmacokinetic analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored throughout the study. All participants completed both treatment phases. The generic formulation satisfied bioequivalence criteria for all primary pharmacokinetic parameters, with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of C<sub>max</sub>, AUC<sub>0-t</sub>, and AUC<sub>0-∞</sub> fully contained within the 80%-125% equivalence range. Three participants (9.4%) experienced mild TEAEs assessed as treatment-related, including transient sinus tachycardia (n = 2) and asymptomatic alanine aminotransferase elevation (n = 1). The generic formulation met bioequivalence criteria and exhibited comparable safety profiles to the reference product.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1591\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpdd.1591","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

克利维地平乳剂是一种静脉降压药,适用于口服治疗禁忌或无效时的急性血压控制。为了解决可获得性的这一差距,我们在32名健康的中国成年人中进行了一项随机、2期、2序列的交叉试验,以评估一种非专利克利夫地平乳剂与参考产品的生物等效性和安全性。在每个研究期间,参与者接受30分钟静脉输注3mg克利维地平(试验或参考配方),并从相对于输注部位的对侧手臂连续采集血液样本进行药代动力学分析。在整个研究过程中监测治疗出现的不良事件(teae)。所有参与者都完成了两个治疗阶段。该仿制药符合所有主要药代动力学参数的生物等效性标准,Cmax、AUC0-t和AUC0-∞的几何平均比值(90%置信区间)完全包含在80%-125%的等效范围内。3名参与者(9.4%)经历轻度teae,评估为与治疗相关,包括短暂性窦性心动过速(n = 2)和无症状谷丙转氨酶升高(n = 1)。该仿制制剂符合生物等效性标准,并显示出与参比产品相当的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Bioequivalence Study of 2 Clevidipine Formulations in Healthy Chinese participants: A Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Trial.

Clevidipine emulsion is an intravenous antihypertensive agent indicated for acute blood pressure control when oral therapies are contraindicated or ineffective. To address this gap in availability, a randomized, 2-period, 2-sequence crossover trial was conducted to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of a generic clevidipine emulsion versus the reference product in 32 healthy Chinese adults. Participants received a 30-minute intravenous infusion of 3 mg of clevidipine (test or reference formulation) in each study period, with serial blood samples collected from the contralateral arm relative to the infusion site for pharmacokinetic analysis. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were monitored throughout the study. All participants completed both treatment phases. The generic formulation satisfied bioequivalence criteria for all primary pharmacokinetic parameters, with geometric mean ratios (90% confidence intervals) of Cmax, AUC0-t, and AUC0-∞ fully contained within the 80%-125% equivalence range. Three participants (9.4%) experienced mild TEAEs assessed as treatment-related, including transient sinus tachycardia (n = 2) and asymptomatic alanine aminotransferase elevation (n = 1). The generic formulation met bioequivalence criteria and exhibited comparable safety profiles to the reference product.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
154
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development is an international, peer-reviewed, online publication focused on publishing high-quality clinical pharmacology studies in drug development which are primarily (but not exclusively) performed in early development phases in healthy subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信