LipidSnapshot -由德国办公室心脏病专家和全科医生记录的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者高胆固醇血症的治疗差距。

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Oliver Weingärtner, Simon Glück, Karl Werdan, Jessica Schorr, Daniel Thieme, Ana de la Llave, Christian von Vultée, Winfried Haerer
{"title":"LipidSnapshot -由德国办公室心脏病专家和全科医生记录的动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病患者高胆固醇血症的治疗差距。","authors":"Oliver Weingärtner, Simon Glück, Karl Werdan, Jessica Schorr, Daniel Thieme, Ana de la Llave, Christian von Vultée, Winfried Haerer","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02751-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Office-based cardiologists (OBCs) and general practitioners (GPs) follow different approaches for hypercholesterolemia management in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study evaluates whether differences in clinical practice between OBCs and GPs contribute to existing gaps in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] screening in ASCVD care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LipidSnapshot is a collaborative research initiative comprising a prospective non-interventional study at OBCs and a retrospective analysis of GP records. It evaluates LDL-C target attainment, Lp(a) testing, and lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in the OBC and the GP setting. Subgroup analyses by gender and age are conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dataset comprises 1,500 ASCVD patients from OBCs and 82,375 patients from GPs. The median LDL-C levels were 68 mg/dL (OBC) vs. 88 mg/dL (GP). LDL-C targets < 55 mg/dL were achieved in 27.4% of patients (OBC) vs. 12.1% of patients (GP). Lp(a) testing rate was 20.3% (OBC) vs. 3.0% (GP). The proportion of patients not receiving any LLT was 1.5% (OBC) vs. 26.6% (GP). LDL-C levels were numerically higher in female patients as well as in younger patients especially in the GP setting. Female patients were less likely to receive LLT compared to their male counterparts and half of the GP patients < 50 years of age remained untreated at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large proportion of ASCVD patients in Germany are inadequately treated, with notable differences between GPs and OBCs. Additionally, gender and age-related disparities are evident. There is a clear need for these gaps to be addressed to improve cross-sectional patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LipidSnapshot - Treatment gaps in hypercholesterolemia in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease documented by office-based cardiologists and general practitioners in Germany.\",\"authors\":\"Oliver Weingärtner, Simon Glück, Karl Werdan, Jessica Schorr, Daniel Thieme, Ana de la Llave, Christian von Vultée, Winfried Haerer\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00392-025-02751-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Office-based cardiologists (OBCs) and general practitioners (GPs) follow different approaches for hypercholesterolemia management in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study evaluates whether differences in clinical practice between OBCs and GPs contribute to existing gaps in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] screening in ASCVD care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>LipidSnapshot is a collaborative research initiative comprising a prospective non-interventional study at OBCs and a retrospective analysis of GP records. It evaluates LDL-C target attainment, Lp(a) testing, and lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in the OBC and the GP setting. Subgroup analyses by gender and age are conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dataset comprises 1,500 ASCVD patients from OBCs and 82,375 patients from GPs. The median LDL-C levels were 68 mg/dL (OBC) vs. 88 mg/dL (GP). LDL-C targets < 55 mg/dL were achieved in 27.4% of patients (OBC) vs. 12.1% of patients (GP). Lp(a) testing rate was 20.3% (OBC) vs. 3.0% (GP). The proportion of patients not receiving any LLT was 1.5% (OBC) vs. 26.6% (GP). LDL-C levels were numerically higher in female patients as well as in younger patients especially in the GP setting. Female patients were less likely to receive LLT compared to their male counterparts and half of the GP patients < 50 years of age remained untreated at all.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A large proportion of ASCVD patients in Germany are inadequately treated, with notable differences between GPs and OBCs. Additionally, gender and age-related disparities are evident. There is a clear need for these gaps to be addressed to improve cross-sectional patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10474,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Research in Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02751-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02751-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:办公室心脏病专家(OBCs)和全科医生(gp)采用不同的方法来管理动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的高胆固醇血症。本研究评估了门诊医生和全科医生的临床实践差异是否导致了ASCVD护理中低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)控制和脂蛋白(a) [Lp(a)]筛查方面存在的差距。方法:LipidSnapshot是一项合作研究计划,包括对OBCs的前瞻性非介入研究和对GP记录的回顾性分析。它评估了低密度脂蛋白c目标的实现,Lp(a)测试,以及在OBC和GP设置的降脂治疗(LLT)。按性别和年龄进行分组分析。结果:该数据集包括来自OBCs的1,500名ASCVD患者和来自gp的82,375名患者。中位LDL-C水平分别为68 mg/dL (OBC)和88 mg/dL (GP)。结论:德国有很大比例的ASCVD患者没有得到充分的治疗,gp和OBCs之间存在显著差异。此外,与性别和年龄有关的差异也很明显。显然需要解决这些差距,以改善横断面患者护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LipidSnapshot - Treatment gaps in hypercholesterolemia in patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease documented by office-based cardiologists and general practitioners in Germany.

Aims: Office-based cardiologists (OBCs) and general practitioners (GPs) follow different approaches for hypercholesterolemia management in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study evaluates whether differences in clinical practice between OBCs and GPs contribute to existing gaps in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] screening in ASCVD care.

Methods: LipidSnapshot is a collaborative research initiative comprising a prospective non-interventional study at OBCs and a retrospective analysis of GP records. It evaluates LDL-C target attainment, Lp(a) testing, and lipid-lowering therapies (LLT) in the OBC and the GP setting. Subgroup analyses by gender and age are conducted.

Results: The dataset comprises 1,500 ASCVD patients from OBCs and 82,375 patients from GPs. The median LDL-C levels were 68 mg/dL (OBC) vs. 88 mg/dL (GP). LDL-C targets < 55 mg/dL were achieved in 27.4% of patients (OBC) vs. 12.1% of patients (GP). Lp(a) testing rate was 20.3% (OBC) vs. 3.0% (GP). The proportion of patients not receiving any LLT was 1.5% (OBC) vs. 26.6% (GP). LDL-C levels were numerically higher in female patients as well as in younger patients especially in the GP setting. Female patients were less likely to receive LLT compared to their male counterparts and half of the GP patients < 50 years of age remained untreated at all.

Conclusion: A large proportion of ASCVD patients in Germany are inadequately treated, with notable differences between GPs and OBCs. Additionally, gender and age-related disparities are evident. There is a clear need for these gaps to be addressed to improve cross-sectional patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信