老年患者非移位型II型齿状突骨折的治疗:军人与平民的比较

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Sennay G Ghenbot, Matthew O'Hara, Cody D Schlaff, Conor McCarthy, Jeremy Tran, Richard C Lee, Alfred J Pisano, Donald J Fredericks, Scott C Wagner, Melvin D Helgeson
{"title":"老年患者非移位型II型齿状突骨折的治疗:军人与平民的比较","authors":"Sennay G Ghenbot, Matthew O'Hara, Cody D Schlaff, Conor McCarthy, Jeremy Tran, Richard C Lee, Alfred J Pisano, Donald J Fredericks, Scott C Wagner, Melvin D Helgeson","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly. Type I and III odontoid fractures are typically treated nonoperatively with Aspen collar immobilization. Treatment of type II odontoid process fractures is of particular interest because of the risk of nonunion, secondary to the watershed blood supply to the base of the odontoid process. Though there is consistent agreement regarding the management of displaced type II fractures, there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of nondisplaced type II fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the Military Health System Data Repository for the ICD-10 codes for nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures and CPT codes for surgical treatment, from 2015 to 2022. We excluded patients under the age of 65, polytraumatized patients, and patients with a diagnosis of displaced type II odontoid fracture during any clinical encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred two patients were diagnosed with nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures. 90.3% of patients underwent nonoperative management. Of the 39 patients (9.70%) undergoing surgery, 56% underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis and 44% underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation. There was no significant difference between surgical rates in the military and nonmilitary population (P=0.46). No patient with an initially diagnosed nondisplaced fracture experienced late displacement. The nonunion prevalence was 3.2% and only occurred in patients managed nonoperatively. No patient with an isolated type II odontoid fracture nonunion underwent surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonoperative management of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures is the preferred treatment modality in this cohort. C1-C2 fusion remains the most common surgical treatment modality. There is no evidence that late displacement is common or expected in patients undergoing nonoperative management. No patient with a diagnosed fracture nonunion underwent delayed surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Nondisplaced Type II Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Military and Civilian Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Sennay G Ghenbot, Matthew O'Hara, Cody D Schlaff, Conor McCarthy, Jeremy Tran, Richard C Lee, Alfred J Pisano, Donald J Fredericks, Scott C Wagner, Melvin D Helgeson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly. Type I and III odontoid fractures are typically treated nonoperatively with Aspen collar immobilization. Treatment of type II odontoid process fractures is of particular interest because of the risk of nonunion, secondary to the watershed blood supply to the base of the odontoid process. Though there is consistent agreement regarding the management of displaced type II fractures, there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of nondisplaced type II fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the Military Health System Data Repository for the ICD-10 codes for nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures and CPT codes for surgical treatment, from 2015 to 2022. We excluded patients under the age of 65, polytraumatized patients, and patients with a diagnosis of displaced type II odontoid fracture during any clinical encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred two patients were diagnosed with nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures. 90.3% of patients underwent nonoperative management. Of the 39 patients (9.70%) undergoing surgery, 56% underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis and 44% underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation. There was no significant difference between surgical rates in the military and nonmilitary population (P=0.46). No patient with an initially diagnosed nondisplaced fracture experienced late displacement. The nonunion prevalence was 3.2% and only occurred in patients managed nonoperatively. No patient with an isolated type II odontoid fracture nonunion underwent surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonoperative management of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures is the preferred treatment modality in this cohort. C1-C2 fusion remains the most common surgical treatment modality. There is no evidence that late displacement is common or expected in patients undergoing nonoperative management. No patient with a diagnosed fracture nonunion underwent delayed surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:探讨非移位型齿状突骨折的手术治疗模式。背景资料总结:齿状突骨折占所有颈椎骨折的1/3,由老年人低能机制引起。I型和III型齿状突骨折通常采用白杨颈圈固定非手术治疗。II型齿状突骨折的治疗是特别有趣的,因为不愈合的风险,继发于齿状突基部的分水岭血液供应。尽管对于移位型II型骨折的治疗有一致的看法,但对于非移位型II型骨折的临床治疗存在明显的异质性。方法:我们查询军队卫生系统数据库2015 - 2022年非移位型II型齿状突骨折的ICD-10代码和手术治疗的CPT代码。我们排除了65岁以下的患者、多创伤患者和诊断为移位型II型齿状突骨折的患者。结果:402例患者被诊断为非移位型II型齿状突骨折。90.3%的患者接受了非手术治疗。39例患者(9.70%)接受手术,56%行C1-C2关节融合术,44%行前齿状突螺钉固定。军人与非军人的手术率无显著差异(P=0.46)。最初诊断为非移位性骨折的患者没有发生晚期移位。不愈合发生率为3.2%,仅发生在非手术治疗的患者中。孤立的II型齿状突骨折不愈合的患者没有接受手术。结论:非手术治疗非移位型II型齿状突骨折是本队列患者首选的治疗方式。C1-C2融合仍然是最常见的手术治疗方式。没有证据表明晚期移位在接受非手术治疗的患者中是常见的或预期的。没有诊断为骨折不愈合的患者接受延迟手术干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Management of Nondisplaced Type II Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Military and Civilian Populations.

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.

Summary of background data: Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly. Type I and III odontoid fractures are typically treated nonoperatively with Aspen collar immobilization. Treatment of type II odontoid process fractures is of particular interest because of the risk of nonunion, secondary to the watershed blood supply to the base of the odontoid process. Though there is consistent agreement regarding the management of displaced type II fractures, there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of nondisplaced type II fractures.

Methods: We queried the Military Health System Data Repository for the ICD-10 codes for nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures and CPT codes for surgical treatment, from 2015 to 2022. We excluded patients under the age of 65, polytraumatized patients, and patients with a diagnosis of displaced type II odontoid fracture during any clinical encounter.

Results: Four hundred two patients were diagnosed with nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures. 90.3% of patients underwent nonoperative management. Of the 39 patients (9.70%) undergoing surgery, 56% underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis and 44% underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation. There was no significant difference between surgical rates in the military and nonmilitary population (P=0.46). No patient with an initially diagnosed nondisplaced fracture experienced late displacement. The nonunion prevalence was 3.2% and only occurred in patients managed nonoperatively. No patient with an isolated type II odontoid fracture nonunion underwent surgery.

Conclusions: Nonoperative management of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures is the preferred treatment modality in this cohort. C1-C2 fusion remains the most common surgical treatment modality. There is no evidence that late displacement is common or expected in patients undergoing nonoperative management. No patient with a diagnosed fracture nonunion underwent delayed surgical intervention.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信