Sennay G Ghenbot, Matthew O'Hara, Cody D Schlaff, Conor McCarthy, Jeremy Tran, Richard C Lee, Alfred J Pisano, Donald J Fredericks, Scott C Wagner, Melvin D Helgeson
{"title":"老年患者非移位型II型齿状突骨折的治疗:军人与平民的比较","authors":"Sennay G Ghenbot, Matthew O'Hara, Cody D Schlaff, Conor McCarthy, Jeremy Tran, Richard C Lee, Alfred J Pisano, Donald J Fredericks, Scott C Wagner, Melvin D Helgeson","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly. Type I and III odontoid fractures are typically treated nonoperatively with Aspen collar immobilization. Treatment of type II odontoid process fractures is of particular interest because of the risk of nonunion, secondary to the watershed blood supply to the base of the odontoid process. Though there is consistent agreement regarding the management of displaced type II fractures, there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of nondisplaced type II fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the Military Health System Data Repository for the ICD-10 codes for nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures and CPT codes for surgical treatment, from 2015 to 2022. We excluded patients under the age of 65, polytraumatized patients, and patients with a diagnosis of displaced type II odontoid fracture during any clinical encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred two patients were diagnosed with nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures. 90.3% of patients underwent nonoperative management. Of the 39 patients (9.70%) undergoing surgery, 56% underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis and 44% underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation. There was no significant difference between surgical rates in the military and nonmilitary population (P=0.46). No patient with an initially diagnosed nondisplaced fracture experienced late displacement. The nonunion prevalence was 3.2% and only occurred in patients managed nonoperatively. No patient with an isolated type II odontoid fracture nonunion underwent surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonoperative management of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures is the preferred treatment modality in this cohort. C1-C2 fusion remains the most common surgical treatment modality. There is no evidence that late displacement is common or expected in patients undergoing nonoperative management. No patient with a diagnosed fracture nonunion underwent delayed surgical intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Management of Nondisplaced Type II Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Military and Civilian Populations.\",\"authors\":\"Sennay G Ghenbot, Matthew O'Hara, Cody D Schlaff, Conor McCarthy, Jeremy Tran, Richard C Lee, Alfred J Pisano, Donald J Fredericks, Scott C Wagner, Melvin D Helgeson\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly. Type I and III odontoid fractures are typically treated nonoperatively with Aspen collar immobilization. Treatment of type II odontoid process fractures is of particular interest because of the risk of nonunion, secondary to the watershed blood supply to the base of the odontoid process. Though there is consistent agreement regarding the management of displaced type II fractures, there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of nondisplaced type II fractures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried the Military Health System Data Repository for the ICD-10 codes for nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures and CPT codes for surgical treatment, from 2015 to 2022. We excluded patients under the age of 65, polytraumatized patients, and patients with a diagnosis of displaced type II odontoid fracture during any clinical encounter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four hundred two patients were diagnosed with nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures. 90.3% of patients underwent nonoperative management. Of the 39 patients (9.70%) undergoing surgery, 56% underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis and 44% underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation. There was no significant difference between surgical rates in the military and nonmilitary population (P=0.46). No patient with an initially diagnosed nondisplaced fracture experienced late displacement. The nonunion prevalence was 3.2% and only occurred in patients managed nonoperatively. No patient with an isolated type II odontoid fracture nonunion underwent surgery.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonoperative management of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures is the preferred treatment modality in this cohort. C1-C2 fusion remains the most common surgical treatment modality. There is no evidence that late displacement is common or expected in patients undergoing nonoperative management. No patient with a diagnosed fracture nonunion underwent delayed surgical intervention.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001918","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Management of Nondisplaced Type II Odontoid Fractures in Elderly Patients: A Comparison of Military and Civilian Populations.
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Objective: The purpose of this study is to investigate patterns of surgical treatment of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures.
Summary of background data: Odontoid fractures represent ∼1/3 of all cervical spine fractures, resulting from low-energy mechanisms in the elderly. Type I and III odontoid fractures are typically treated nonoperatively with Aspen collar immobilization. Treatment of type II odontoid process fractures is of particular interest because of the risk of nonunion, secondary to the watershed blood supply to the base of the odontoid process. Though there is consistent agreement regarding the management of displaced type II fractures, there is marked heterogeneity in the clinical management of nondisplaced type II fractures.
Methods: We queried the Military Health System Data Repository for the ICD-10 codes for nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures and CPT codes for surgical treatment, from 2015 to 2022. We excluded patients under the age of 65, polytraumatized patients, and patients with a diagnosis of displaced type II odontoid fracture during any clinical encounter.
Results: Four hundred two patients were diagnosed with nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures. 90.3% of patients underwent nonoperative management. Of the 39 patients (9.70%) undergoing surgery, 56% underwent C1-C2 arthrodesis and 44% underwent anterior odontoid screw fixation. There was no significant difference between surgical rates in the military and nonmilitary population (P=0.46). No patient with an initially diagnosed nondisplaced fracture experienced late displacement. The nonunion prevalence was 3.2% and only occurred in patients managed nonoperatively. No patient with an isolated type II odontoid fracture nonunion underwent surgery.
Conclusions: Nonoperative management of nondisplaced type II odontoid fractures is the preferred treatment modality in this cohort. C1-C2 fusion remains the most common surgical treatment modality. There is no evidence that late displacement is common or expected in patients undergoing nonoperative management. No patient with a diagnosed fracture nonunion underwent delayed surgical intervention.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.