Yazan Shamli Oghli, Shreya Vinjamuri, Zachary Sokol, Eric Mong, Sara Thalheimer, Eugene Martin, Steven Yi, Rabiul Rafi, Saurav Sumughan, Daniel K Fahim, James Harrop
{"title":"术中基线运动信号作为完全性脊髓损伤恢复的预测指标。","authors":"Yazan Shamli Oghli, Shreya Vinjamuri, Zachary Sokol, Eric Mong, Sara Thalheimer, Eugene Martin, Steven Yi, Rabiul Rafi, Saurav Sumughan, Daniel K Fahim, James Harrop","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the study was to investigate the association between the presence of baseline sensory and motor intraoperative neuromonitoring and follow-up functional improvement in complete SCI.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>During surgery for complete spinal cord injury (SCI), a subset of patients may have present sensory and motor signals at baseline, suggesting that neuronal tracts may be intact as a target for novel therapeutics or even as a prognostic tool for recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred nineteen complete SCI patients who had a decompression procedure were reviewed in this retrospective study. Intraoperative neuromonitoring signals at baseline were obtained, and the presence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the level of injury and above, as well as somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) at the posterior tibial (PTN) and ulnar (UN) nerves was determined. ASIA scores were collected, and grade conversions and level improvements were both considered functional improvements. Binary logistic regression was completed, with patient age, sex, race, level of injury, and all the above signals as covariates, and functional improvement as the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 32% of all patients had functional improvement. 17.2% of patients had MEPs present at the level of injury, whereas 49.2% had MEPs present at least one level above injury. The only significant predictor of improvement was MEPs present at the level of injury (OR=3.14, P=0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative motor signals at the level of injury may hold prognostic value following surgery in complete SCI, which is crucial for determining patient outcomes and guiding future management and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative Baseline Motor Signals as a Predictor of Recovery in Complete Spinal Cord Injury.\",\"authors\":\"Yazan Shamli Oghli, Shreya Vinjamuri, Zachary Sokol, Eric Mong, Sara Thalheimer, Eugene Martin, Steven Yi, Rabiul Rafi, Saurav Sumughan, Daniel K Fahim, James Harrop\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001907\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective observational study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of the study was to investigate the association between the presence of baseline sensory and motor intraoperative neuromonitoring and follow-up functional improvement in complete SCI.</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>During surgery for complete spinal cord injury (SCI), a subset of patients may have present sensory and motor signals at baseline, suggesting that neuronal tracts may be intact as a target for novel therapeutics or even as a prognostic tool for recovery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred nineteen complete SCI patients who had a decompression procedure were reviewed in this retrospective study. Intraoperative neuromonitoring signals at baseline were obtained, and the presence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the level of injury and above, as well as somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) at the posterior tibial (PTN) and ulnar (UN) nerves was determined. ASIA scores were collected, and grade conversions and level improvements were both considered functional improvements. Binary logistic regression was completed, with patient age, sex, race, level of injury, and all the above signals as covariates, and functional improvement as the outcome.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Approximately 32% of all patients had functional improvement. 17.2% of patients had MEPs present at the level of injury, whereas 49.2% had MEPs present at least one level above injury. The only significant predictor of improvement was MEPs present at the level of injury (OR=3.14, P=0.023).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intraoperative motor signals at the level of injury may hold prognostic value following surgery in complete SCI, which is crucial for determining patient outcomes and guiding future management and decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001907\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001907","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Intraoperative Baseline Motor Signals as a Predictor of Recovery in Complete Spinal Cord Injury.
Study design: Retrospective observational study.
Objective: The purpose of the study was to investigate the association between the presence of baseline sensory and motor intraoperative neuromonitoring and follow-up functional improvement in complete SCI.
Summary of background data: During surgery for complete spinal cord injury (SCI), a subset of patients may have present sensory and motor signals at baseline, suggesting that neuronal tracts may be intact as a target for novel therapeutics or even as a prognostic tool for recovery.
Methods: One hundred nineteen complete SCI patients who had a decompression procedure were reviewed in this retrospective study. Intraoperative neuromonitoring signals at baseline were obtained, and the presence of motor evoked potentials (MEPs) at the level of injury and above, as well as somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) at the posterior tibial (PTN) and ulnar (UN) nerves was determined. ASIA scores were collected, and grade conversions and level improvements were both considered functional improvements. Binary logistic regression was completed, with patient age, sex, race, level of injury, and all the above signals as covariates, and functional improvement as the outcome.
Results: Approximately 32% of all patients had functional improvement. 17.2% of patients had MEPs present at the level of injury, whereas 49.2% had MEPs present at least one level above injury. The only significant predictor of improvement was MEPs present at the level of injury (OR=3.14, P=0.023).
Conclusions: Intraoperative motor signals at the level of injury may hold prognostic value following surgery in complete SCI, which is crucial for determining patient outcomes and guiding future management and decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure.
Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.