糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析患者体成分变化及相角影响因素

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Yuanzhao Xu, Chenxin Wang, Yixuan Li, Gaofeng Song, Cai Xu, Shuyi Ling, Airong Qi
{"title":"糖尿病肾病维持性血液透析患者体成分变化及相角影响因素","authors":"Yuanzhao Xu, Chenxin Wang, Yixuan Li, Gaofeng Song, Cai Xu, Shuyi Ling, Airong Qi","doi":"10.5414/CN111704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to compare the clinical differences between patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and to investigate the influencing factors and clinical significance of phase angle (PhA) in DN patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Hemodialysis patients (n = 48), including 23 with DN and 25 with NDN, were enrolled in this study. Body composition parameters were assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and various biochemical indices were collected. The follow-up period was extended to 5 years. To investigate the relationship between PhA, nutritional status, and other clinical factors, univariate analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and logistic regression analysis were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analysis demonstrated significant pathophysiological divergence between groups. DN patients exhibited reduced dialysis adequacy (kt/V: 1.424 ± 0.215 vs. 1.57 ± 0.210, p = 0.021) and impaired cellular integrity evidenced by lower PhA values (4.358 ± 1.044 vs. 5.031 ± 1.23°, p = 0.048). Fluid overload patterns distinctly characterized DN patients, with elevated extracellular water ratios (ECW/TBW: 40.265 ± 1.262% vs. 39.282 ± 1.858%, p = 0.039; ECW/ICW: 63.426 ± 3.774 vs. 61.128 ± 3.244, p = 0.028). PhA demonstrated strong inverse correlations with fluid retention parameters (ECW/TBW: r = -0.954, p < 0.001; ECW/ICW: r = -0.946, p < 0.001) and positive associations with nutritional metrics including Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI)(r = 0.496, p = 0.016), muscle circumference index (MCI) (r = 0.494, p = 0.017), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) (r = 0.511, p = 0.013), and serum creatinine (Cr) levels (r = 0.448, p = 0.032). High hydration status and low muscle mass were identified as critical factors influencing the reduced PhA observed in DN patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in body composition and PhA exist between maintenance hemodialysis patients with DN and NDN. Low PhA is closely associated with malnutrition and can serve as an effective indicator for evaluating the nutritional status of DN patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":10396,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nephrology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Body composition changes and influencing factors of phase angle in maintenance hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Yuanzhao Xu, Chenxin Wang, Yixuan Li, Gaofeng Song, Cai Xu, Shuyi Ling, Airong Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CN111704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to compare the clinical differences between patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and to investigate the influencing factors and clinical significance of phase angle (PhA) in DN patients.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Hemodialysis patients (n = 48), including 23 with DN and 25 with NDN, were enrolled in this study. Body composition parameters were assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and various biochemical indices were collected. The follow-up period was extended to 5 years. To investigate the relationship between PhA, nutritional status, and other clinical factors, univariate analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and logistic regression analysis were employed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Comparative analysis demonstrated significant pathophysiological divergence between groups. DN patients exhibited reduced dialysis adequacy (kt/V: 1.424 ± 0.215 vs. 1.57 ± 0.210, p = 0.021) and impaired cellular integrity evidenced by lower PhA values (4.358 ± 1.044 vs. 5.031 ± 1.23°, p = 0.048). Fluid overload patterns distinctly characterized DN patients, with elevated extracellular water ratios (ECW/TBW: 40.265 ± 1.262% vs. 39.282 ± 1.858%, p = 0.039; ECW/ICW: 63.426 ± 3.774 vs. 61.128 ± 3.244, p = 0.028). PhA demonstrated strong inverse correlations with fluid retention parameters (ECW/TBW: r = -0.954, p < 0.001; ECW/ICW: r = -0.946, p < 0.001) and positive associations with nutritional metrics including Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI)(r = 0.496, p = 0.016), muscle circumference index (MCI) (r = 0.494, p = 0.017), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) (r = 0.511, p = 0.013), and serum creatinine (Cr) levels (r = 0.448, p = 0.032). High hydration status and low muscle mass were identified as critical factors influencing the reduced PhA observed in DN patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Significant differences in body composition and PhA exist between maintenance hemodialysis patients with DN and NDN. Low PhA is closely associated with malnutrition and can serve as an effective indicator for evaluating the nutritional status of DN patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nephrology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nephrology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111704\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CN111704","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本回顾性纵向队列研究旨在比较糖尿病肾病(DN)与非糖尿病肾病(NDN)维持性血液透析患者的临床差异,探讨DN患者相位角(PhA)的影响因素及临床意义。材料与方法:选取血液透析患者48例,其中DN患者23例,NDN患者25例。采用生物电阻抗分析法(BIA)评价各组体组成参数,收集各组生物化学指标。随访期延长至5年。采用单因素分析、主成分分析(PCA)和logistic回归分析探讨PhA与营养状况及其他临床因素的关系。结果:组间病理生理差异显著。DN患者透析充分性降低(kt/V: 1.424±0.215比1.57±0.210,p = 0.021),细胞完整性受损,PhA值降低(4.358±1.044比5.031±1.23°,p = 0.048)。液体超载模式明显表征DN患者,细胞外水比升高(ECW/TBW: 40.265±1.262%比39.282±1.858%,p = 0.039; ECW/ICW: 63.426±3.774比61.128±3.244,p = 0.028)。PhA与体液潴留参数呈显著负相关(ECW/TBW: r = -0.954, p)。结论:维持血液透析合并DN和NDN患者体内成分和PhA存在显著差异。低PhA与营养不良密切相关,可作为评估DN患者营养状况的有效指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Body composition changes and influencing factors of phase angle in maintenance hemodialysis patients with diabetic nephropathy.

Objective: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study aimed to compare the clinical differences between patients with diabetic nephropathy (DN) and non-diabetic nephropathy (NDN) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis and to investigate the influencing factors and clinical significance of phase angle (PhA) in DN patients.

Materials and methods: Hemodialysis patients (n = 48), including 23 with DN and 25 with NDN, were enrolled in this study. Body composition parameters were assessed using bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), and various biochemical indices were collected. The follow-up period was extended to 5 years. To investigate the relationship between PhA, nutritional status, and other clinical factors, univariate analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and logistic regression analysis were employed.

Results: Comparative analysis demonstrated significant pathophysiological divergence between groups. DN patients exhibited reduced dialysis adequacy (kt/V: 1.424 ± 0.215 vs. 1.57 ± 0.210, p = 0.021) and impaired cellular integrity evidenced by lower PhA values (4.358 ± 1.044 vs. 5.031 ± 1.23°, p = 0.048). Fluid overload patterns distinctly characterized DN patients, with elevated extracellular water ratios (ECW/TBW: 40.265 ± 1.262% vs. 39.282 ± 1.858%, p = 0.039; ECW/ICW: 63.426 ± 3.774 vs. 61.128 ± 3.244, p = 0.028). PhA demonstrated strong inverse correlations with fluid retention parameters (ECW/TBW: r = -0.954, p < 0.001; ECW/ICW: r = -0.946, p < 0.001) and positive associations with nutritional metrics including Fat-Free Mass Index (FFMI)(r = 0.496, p = 0.016), muscle circumference index (MCI) (r = 0.494, p = 0.017), Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) (r = 0.511, p = 0.013), and serum creatinine (Cr) levels (r = 0.448, p = 0.032). High hydration status and low muscle mass were identified as critical factors influencing the reduced PhA observed in DN patients.

Conclusion: Significant differences in body composition and PhA exist between maintenance hemodialysis patients with DN and NDN. Low PhA is closely associated with malnutrition and can serve as an effective indicator for evaluating the nutritional status of DN patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical nephrology
Clinical nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
138
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Nephrology appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: prophylaxis, pathophysiology, immunology, diagnosis, therapy, experimental approaches and dialysis and transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信