不同设置下铥光纤激光器对灌洗液温度变化的研究及与Ho:YAG激光器的比较:体外实验研究。

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-07 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2024.0165
Mohammed Obaidat, Arman Tsaturyan, Vasileios Tatanis, Angelis Peteinaris, Ergina Farsari, Solon Faitatziadis, Konstantinos Pagonis, Athanasios Vagionis, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis
{"title":"不同设置下铥光纤激光器对灌洗液温度变化的研究及与Ho:YAG激光器的比较:体外实验研究。","authors":"Mohammed Obaidat, Arman Tsaturyan, Vasileios Tatanis, Angelis Peteinaris, Ergina Farsari, Solon Faitatziadis, Konstantinos Pagonis, Athanasios Vagionis, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2024.0165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our experimental <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to evaluate the impact of four power settings with different energy and frequency combinations on the irrigation fluid temperature using the thulium fiber laser (TFL). In addition, we aimed to identify the differences between the Ho: YAG laser and TFL by direct comparison of the same power settings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All measurements were performed with a fluid volume fixed at 10 ml and an outflow rate at 10 ml/min. The laser was fired continuously for 30 seconds with total power settings of 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W with different power settings (energy × frequency) and various pulse combinations using TFL and Ho: YAG laser (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher temperatures were recorded when the power was increased from 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, to 60 W. The temperature exceeded the threshold of 43°C when power settings of ≥40 W were applied regardless of frequency (15-120 Hz) and energy (0.5-4 J). Similar temperature increase patterns were reported with different peak power settings. No major differences were found when the same power settings were applied using TFL and Ho: YAG lasers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our results temperatures >43°C were recorded for power settings ≥40 W after continuous laser firing of 30 seconds using TFL. Modifying the frequency and energy settings, as well as firing with Ho:YAG laser under the same power setting did not affect the patterns of temperature increase. Generally, the TFL shows more regular thermal behavior in comparison with the Ho:YAG laser.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 2","pages":"184-191"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379816/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of irrigation fluid temperature variations caused by thulium fiber laser with various settings and comparison with Ho:YAG laser: An <i>in vitro</i> experimental study.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammed Obaidat, Arman Tsaturyan, Vasileios Tatanis, Angelis Peteinaris, Ergina Farsari, Solon Faitatziadis, Konstantinos Pagonis, Athanasios Vagionis, Evangelos Liatsikos, Panagiotis Kallidonis\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2024.0165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Our experimental <i>in vitro</i> study aimed to evaluate the impact of four power settings with different energy and frequency combinations on the irrigation fluid temperature using the thulium fiber laser (TFL). In addition, we aimed to identify the differences between the Ho: YAG laser and TFL by direct comparison of the same power settings.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>All measurements were performed with a fluid volume fixed at 10 ml and an outflow rate at 10 ml/min. The laser was fired continuously for 30 seconds with total power settings of 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W with different power settings (energy × frequency) and various pulse combinations using TFL and Ho: YAG laser (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Higher temperatures were recorded when the power was increased from 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, to 60 W. The temperature exceeded the threshold of 43°C when power settings of ≥40 W were applied regardless of frequency (15-120 Hz) and energy (0.5-4 J). Similar temperature increase patterns were reported with different peak power settings. No major differences were found when the same power settings were applied using TFL and Ho: YAG lasers.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on our results temperatures >43°C were recorded for power settings ≥40 W after continuous laser firing of 30 seconds using TFL. Modifying the frequency and energy settings, as well as firing with Ho:YAG laser under the same power setting did not affect the patterns of temperature increase. Generally, the TFL shows more regular thermal behavior in comparison with the Ho:YAG laser.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"184-191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379816/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/7 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2024.0165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本实验旨在评估四种不同能量和频率组合的功率设置对铥光纤激光器(TFL)灌洗液温度的影响。此外,我们旨在通过直接比较相同功率设置来确定Ho: YAG激光器和TFL之间的差异。材料和方法:所有测量均在液体体积固定为10 ml,流出速率为10 ml/min的情况下进行。使用TFL和Ho: YAG激光器(Quanta System, Samarate, Italy),以不同的功率设置(能量×频率)和不同的脉冲组合,以10 W、20 W、40 W和60 W的总功率设置连续发射30秒。结果:当功率从10 W、20 W、40 W增加到60 W时,温度升高。无论频率(15 ~ 120hz)和能量(0.5 ~ 4j),当功率设置≥40w时,温度均超过43℃的阈值。在不同的峰值功率设置下,报告了相似的温度升高模式。当使用TFL和Ho: YAG激光器进行相同的功率设置时,没有发现主要差异。结论:根据我们的研究结果,在功率设置≥40 W的情况下,使用TFL连续激光照射30秒后,记录到温度为>43°C。修改频率和能量设置,以及在相同功率设置下使用Ho:YAG激光发射,对温度升高的模式没有影响。总的来说,与Ho:YAG激光器相比,TFL激光器表现出更规则的热行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Investigation of irrigation fluid temperature variations caused by thulium fiber laser with various settings and comparison with Ho:YAG laser: An <i>in vitro</i> experimental study.

Investigation of irrigation fluid temperature variations caused by thulium fiber laser with various settings and comparison with Ho:YAG laser: An <i>in vitro</i> experimental study.

Investigation of irrigation fluid temperature variations caused by thulium fiber laser with various settings and comparison with Ho:YAG laser: An <i>in vitro</i> experimental study.

Investigation of irrigation fluid temperature variations caused by thulium fiber laser with various settings and comparison with Ho:YAG laser: An in vitro experimental study.

Introduction: Our experimental in vitro study aimed to evaluate the impact of four power settings with different energy and frequency combinations on the irrigation fluid temperature using the thulium fiber laser (TFL). In addition, we aimed to identify the differences between the Ho: YAG laser and TFL by direct comparison of the same power settings.

Material and methods: All measurements were performed with a fluid volume fixed at 10 ml and an outflow rate at 10 ml/min. The laser was fired continuously for 30 seconds with total power settings of 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, and 60 W with different power settings (energy × frequency) and various pulse combinations using TFL and Ho: YAG laser (Quanta System, Samarate, Italy).

Results: Higher temperatures were recorded when the power was increased from 10 W, 20 W, 40 W, to 60 W. The temperature exceeded the threshold of 43°C when power settings of ≥40 W were applied regardless of frequency (15-120 Hz) and energy (0.5-4 J). Similar temperature increase patterns were reported with different peak power settings. No major differences were found when the same power settings were applied using TFL and Ho: YAG lasers.

Conclusions: Based on our results temperatures >43°C were recorded for power settings ≥40 W after continuous laser firing of 30 seconds using TFL. Modifying the frequency and energy settings, as well as firing with Ho:YAG laser under the same power setting did not affect the patterns of temperature increase. Generally, the TFL shows more regular thermal behavior in comparison with the Ho:YAG laser.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信