尿石症患者在线资料的跨语言分析:跨24种欧洲语言的评估。

IF 1.9 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Central European Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-26 DOI:10.5173/ceju.2025.0045
Wojciech Tomczak, Wojciech Krajewski, Katarzyna Grunwald, Adam Chełmoński, Joanna Chorbińska, Łukasz Nowak, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Adam Gurwin, Magdalena Krajewska, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko
{"title":"尿石症患者在线资料的跨语言分析:跨24种欧洲语言的评估。","authors":"Wojciech Tomczak, Wojciech Krajewski, Katarzyna Grunwald, Adam Chełmoński, Joanna Chorbińska, Łukasz Nowak, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Adam Gurwin, Magdalena Krajewska, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko","doi":"10.5173/ceju.2025.0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition with several etiological factors, affecting up to 20% of the population and exhibiting high recurrence rates. Its strain on healthcare systems, exacerbated by high incidence and recurrence, often results in insufficient time for thorough diagnostics and counselling. Consequently, many patients seek easily accessible online sources of information. This study aimed to assess the readability and availability of online urolithiasis materials across 24 official European languages to compare readability across different source types.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The phrase \"kidney stones\" was translated into all official European languages, and the first 50 search results for each language were retrieved. Non-functional websites, those requiring accounts or payments, and duplicates were excluded. Relevance was assessed using Google Translate to filter out results lacking medical information. Only patient-oriented materials were included for analysis. Obtained results were then classified by source category, and their readability was assessed using LIX formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 723 articles were analysed. The English term yielded the highest number of results, followed by Spanish and Portuguese. Overall, the English articles performed best, being the only language with a mean LIX score below 40, which marks the threshold between \"somewhat hard\" and \"hard\" to read. Finnish, Lithuanian, and Hungarian materials had LIX scores significantly exceeding the threshold of 50, classifying them as \"very hard to read\" and among the most difficult to comprehend.A subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences across the source classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online materials on kidney stones are generally too complex for patients, limiting their understanding and treatment adherence. Simplification of patient-oriented materials along with artificial intelligence utilisation could enhance comprehension. Improved awareness may promote adherence to preventive measures and help reduce the incidence and economic burden of urolithiasis.</p>","PeriodicalId":9744,"journal":{"name":"Central European Journal of Urology","volume":"78 2","pages":"221-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379832/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.\",\"authors\":\"Wojciech Tomczak, Wojciech Krajewski, Katarzyna Grunwald, Adam Chełmoński, Joanna Chorbińska, Łukasz Nowak, Jan Łaszkiewicz, Adam Gurwin, Magdalena Krajewska, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Tomasz Szydełko\",\"doi\":\"10.5173/ceju.2025.0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition with several etiological factors, affecting up to 20% of the population and exhibiting high recurrence rates. Its strain on healthcare systems, exacerbated by high incidence and recurrence, often results in insufficient time for thorough diagnostics and counselling. Consequently, many patients seek easily accessible online sources of information. This study aimed to assess the readability and availability of online urolithiasis materials across 24 official European languages to compare readability across different source types.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The phrase \\\"kidney stones\\\" was translated into all official European languages, and the first 50 search results for each language were retrieved. Non-functional websites, those requiring accounts or payments, and duplicates were excluded. Relevance was assessed using Google Translate to filter out results lacking medical information. Only patient-oriented materials were included for analysis. Obtained results were then classified by source category, and their readability was assessed using LIX formula.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 723 articles were analysed. The English term yielded the highest number of results, followed by Spanish and Portuguese. Overall, the English articles performed best, being the only language with a mean LIX score below 40, which marks the threshold between \\\"somewhat hard\\\" and \\\"hard\\\" to read. Finnish, Lithuanian, and Hungarian materials had LIX scores significantly exceeding the threshold of 50, classifying them as \\\"very hard to read\\\" and among the most difficult to comprehend.A subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences across the source classification.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Online materials on kidney stones are generally too complex for patients, limiting their understanding and treatment adherence. Simplification of patient-oriented materials along with artificial intelligence utilisation could enhance comprehension. Improved awareness may promote adherence to preventive measures and help reduce the incidence and economic burden of urolithiasis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9744,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"volume\":\"78 2\",\"pages\":\"221-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379832/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Central European Journal of Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2025.0045\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/5/26 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Central European Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5173/ceju.2025.0045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:尿石症是一种常见的疾病,有多种病因,影响高达20%的人口,并表现出高复发率。该病的高发病率和复发加剧了卫生保健系统的压力,往往导致没有足够的时间进行彻底的诊断和咨询。因此,许多患者寻求易于访问的在线信息来源。本研究旨在评估24种欧洲官方语言在线尿石症资料的可读性和可用性,以比较不同来源类型的可读性。材料和方法:将短语“肾结石”翻译成所有欧洲官方语言,并检索每种语言的前50个搜索结果。非功能性网站、需要账户或付款的网站以及重复的网站被排除在外。使用谷歌Translate来评估相关性,以过滤掉缺乏医疗信息的结果。仅纳入以患者为导向的材料进行分析。然后将获得的结果按来源类别分类,并使用LIX公式评估其可读性。结果:共分析文献723篇。英语搜索结果最多,其次是西班牙语和葡萄牙语。总体而言,英语文章表现最好,是唯一一个LIX平均分低于40分的语言,这是“有点难”和“难”阅读之间的界限。芬兰语、立陶宛语和匈牙利语材料的LIX分数明显超过了50分的阈值,被归类为“非常难以阅读”和最难理解。亚组分析显示,不同来源分类之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:网上肾结石资料对患者来说通常过于复杂,限制了他们的理解和治疗依从性。简化面向患者的材料以及人工智能的应用可以提高理解能力。提高对尿石症的认识可以促进对预防措施的坚持,并有助于减少尿石症的发病率和经济负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.

A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.

A cross-language analysis of urolithiasis patient online materials: Assessment across 24 European languages.

Introduction: Urolithiasis is a prevalent condition with several etiological factors, affecting up to 20% of the population and exhibiting high recurrence rates. Its strain on healthcare systems, exacerbated by high incidence and recurrence, often results in insufficient time for thorough diagnostics and counselling. Consequently, many patients seek easily accessible online sources of information. This study aimed to assess the readability and availability of online urolithiasis materials across 24 official European languages to compare readability across different source types.

Material and methods: The phrase "kidney stones" was translated into all official European languages, and the first 50 search results for each language were retrieved. Non-functional websites, those requiring accounts or payments, and duplicates were excluded. Relevance was assessed using Google Translate to filter out results lacking medical information. Only patient-oriented materials were included for analysis. Obtained results were then classified by source category, and their readability was assessed using LIX formula.

Results: A total of 723 articles were analysed. The English term yielded the highest number of results, followed by Spanish and Portuguese. Overall, the English articles performed best, being the only language with a mean LIX score below 40, which marks the threshold between "somewhat hard" and "hard" to read. Finnish, Lithuanian, and Hungarian materials had LIX scores significantly exceeding the threshold of 50, classifying them as "very hard to read" and among the most difficult to comprehend.A subgroup analysis revealed no statistically significant differences across the source classification.

Conclusions: Online materials on kidney stones are generally too complex for patients, limiting their understanding and treatment adherence. Simplification of patient-oriented materials along with artificial intelligence utilisation could enhance comprehension. Improved awareness may promote adherence to preventive measures and help reduce the incidence and economic burden of urolithiasis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Central European Journal of Urology
Central European Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
48
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信