评估接受姑息性家庭肠外营养的患者的生存结果:一项回顾性观察性研究。

IF 2.9 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Kristie Huirong Fan, Pinal S Patel, Rebecca Maddison, Emma McKenzie, Nicola Wilson, Dunecan Massey, Jeremy Woodward, Charlotte Rutter
{"title":"评估接受姑息性家庭肠外营养的患者的生存结果:一项回顾性观察性研究。","authors":"Kristie Huirong Fan, Pinal S Patel, Rebecca Maddison, Emma McKenzie, Nicola Wilson, Dunecan Massey, Jeremy Woodward, Charlotte Rutter","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intestinal failure in advanced malignancy is most commonly due to mechanical bowel obstruction. Palliative home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an option for such patients to meet their nutritional needs. However, there are limited data on overall survival and predictive factors. This study aimed to evaluate the survival of patients receiving palliative HPN and the impact of patient factors on survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre retrospective observational study of patients referred for palliative HPN from 1 January 2020 to 19 November 2024 at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Demographic, nutritional and medical data were analysed. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84 patients were referred and 77 were discharged with HPN (median age was 60.9 years (IQR: 51.3-70.4), female 77%). 78% of the underlying primary malignancies were gynaecological and gastrointestinal. Malignant bowel obstruction was the main indication for HPN (86%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) scores were ≤2 in 82% of patients and 75% had an estimated prognosis of >3 months. Median survival was 58 days (IQR 31-108) with a 3-month mortality of 69%. There was no statistical difference in survival by PS, estimated prognosis, underlying malignancy or modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall survival in our study is modest. PS, prognosis, mGPS or tumour type did not show a significant impact on survival. This highlights the challenges in artificial nutrition and emphasises the role of a multidisciplinary team in the care of these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366573/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of survival outcomes in patients receiving palliative home parenteral nutrition: a retrospective observational study.\",\"authors\":\"Kristie Huirong Fan, Pinal S Patel, Rebecca Maddison, Emma McKenzie, Nicola Wilson, Dunecan Massey, Jeremy Woodward, Charlotte Rutter\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Intestinal failure in advanced malignancy is most commonly due to mechanical bowel obstruction. Palliative home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an option for such patients to meet their nutritional needs. However, there are limited data on overall survival and predictive factors. This study aimed to evaluate the survival of patients receiving palliative HPN and the impact of patient factors on survival.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a single-centre retrospective observational study of patients referred for palliative HPN from 1 January 2020 to 19 November 2024 at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Demographic, nutritional and medical data were analysed. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>84 patients were referred and 77 were discharged with HPN (median age was 60.9 years (IQR: 51.3-70.4), female 77%). 78% of the underlying primary malignancies were gynaecological and gastrointestinal. Malignant bowel obstruction was the main indication for HPN (86%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) scores were ≤2 in 82% of patients and 75% had an estimated prognosis of >3 months. Median survival was 58 days (IQR 31-108) with a 3-month mortality of 69%. There was no statistical difference in survival by PS, estimated prognosis, underlying malignancy or modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall survival in our study is modest. PS, prognosis, mGPS or tumour type did not show a significant impact on survival. This highlights the challenges in artificial nutrition and emphasises the role of a multidisciplinary team in the care of these patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9235,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12366573/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Gastroenterology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001822\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001822","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:机械性肠梗阻是晚期恶性肿瘤肠功能衰竭最常见的原因。姑息性家庭肠外营养(HPN)是满足这类患者营养需求的一种选择。然而,关于总生存率和预测因素的数据有限。本研究旨在评估接受姑息性HPN患者的生存及患者因素对生存的影响。方法:这是一项单中心回顾性观察研究,研究对象是2020年1月1日至2024年11月19日在剑桥大学医院NHS基金会信托基金转诊的姑息性HPN患者。对人口、营养和医疗数据进行了分析。生存率采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归进行比较。结果:84例患者转诊,77例患者出院(中位年龄60.9岁(IQR: 51.3-70.4),女性77%)。78%的潜在原发性恶性肿瘤发生在妇科和胃肠道。恶性肠梗阻是HPN的主要适应症(86%)。东部肿瘤合作组(Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group)的表现状态(performance status, PS)评分≤2分的患者占82%,75%的患者预后为3个月。中位生存期为58天(IQR 31-108), 3个月死亡率为69%。PS、预估预后、潜在恶性或改良格拉斯哥预后评分(mGPS)的生存率无统计学差异。结论:本研究的总生存率不高。PS、预后、mGPS或肿瘤类型对生存率无显著影响。这突出了人工营养的挑战,并强调了多学科团队在这些患者护理中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of survival outcomes in patients receiving palliative home parenteral nutrition: a retrospective observational study.

Evaluation of survival outcomes in patients receiving palliative home parenteral nutrition: a retrospective observational study.

Objective: Intestinal failure in advanced malignancy is most commonly due to mechanical bowel obstruction. Palliative home parenteral nutrition (HPN) is an option for such patients to meet their nutritional needs. However, there are limited data on overall survival and predictive factors. This study aimed to evaluate the survival of patients receiving palliative HPN and the impact of patient factors on survival.

Methods: This is a single-centre retrospective observational study of patients referred for palliative HPN from 1 January 2020 to 19 November 2024 at the Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust. Demographic, nutritional and medical data were analysed. Survival rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression.

Results: 84 patients were referred and 77 were discharged with HPN (median age was 60.9 years (IQR: 51.3-70.4), female 77%). 78% of the underlying primary malignancies were gynaecological and gastrointestinal. Malignant bowel obstruction was the main indication for HPN (86%). Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) scores were ≤2 in 82% of patients and 75% had an estimated prognosis of >3 months. Median survival was 58 days (IQR 31-108) with a 3-month mortality of 69%. There was no statistical difference in survival by PS, estimated prognosis, underlying malignancy or modified Glasgow Prognostic Score (mGPS).

Conclusions: The overall survival in our study is modest. PS, prognosis, mGPS or tumour type did not show a significant impact on survival. This highlights the challenges in artificial nutrition and emphasises the role of a multidisciplinary team in the care of these patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信