气管手术术中体外生命支持:20年单中心经验。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lin Sun, Liping Xin, Yuwei Qiu, Lingfeng Xu, Xin Chang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Zhen Guo
{"title":"气管手术术中体外生命支持:20年单中心经验。","authors":"Lin Sun, Liping Xin, Yuwei Qiu, Lingfeng Xu, Xin Chang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Zhen Guo","doi":"10.1186/s12871-025-03285-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in perioperative management, patients undergoing complex tracheal surgery still face increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can be utilized to maintain hemodynamic and respiratory stability during surgical procedures, but there is currently no evidence-based practice protocol in place. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and benefits of various ECLS modes in critical tracheal surgery and establish a practical protocol for the application of ECLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center, retrospective, cohort study. This retrospective study collected data on patients who underwent tracheal procedures on ECLS between January 2000 and December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups according to configuration: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), modified CPB and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital complications, ECLS details, adverse events, and overall survival were assessed and compared between three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over twenty years period, from 462 primary tracheal disease patients, 67 patients were identified from our institutional medical registry as having received CPB, modified-CPB or ECMO during the procedure (26.9%, 22.4% and 50.7% respectively). Heparin free (n = 30, 44.8%) or low dose heparin (n = 17, 26.6%) therapy was frequently utilized in ECMO and modified-CPB group. The Median pump duration of CPB, modified-CPB, VV, and VA ECMO was 43, 64, 139, and 127 min. Anastomotic complications were significantly lower in the VV-ECMO group (7.1%), while the duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in the VA-ECMO group (66, [2-178]). Surgical bleeding was significantly higher in the CPB group (460 ± 73 ml). More patients in the CPB group (9/18) required blood transfusions; however, there was no significant difference in the volume of packed red blood cells between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite intraoperative ECLS being rarely used in tracheal and carinal disease, programmed extracorporeal life support with VV-ECMO demonstrated high effectiveness with an acceptable mortality and morbidity rate in high-risk tracheal surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9190,"journal":{"name":"BMC Anesthesiology","volume":"25 1","pages":"425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intraoperative extracorporeal life support in tracheal surgery: a 20-year single-center experience.\",\"authors\":\"Lin Sun, Liping Xin, Yuwei Qiu, Lingfeng Xu, Xin Chang, Xiaoyu Zhou, Zhen Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12871-025-03285-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite advancements in perioperative management, patients undergoing complex tracheal surgery still face increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can be utilized to maintain hemodynamic and respiratory stability during surgical procedures, but there is currently no evidence-based practice protocol in place. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and benefits of various ECLS modes in critical tracheal surgery and establish a practical protocol for the application of ECLS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Single center, retrospective, cohort study. This retrospective study collected data on patients who underwent tracheal procedures on ECLS between January 2000 and December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups according to configuration: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), modified CPB and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital complications, ECLS details, adverse events, and overall survival were assessed and compared between three groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over twenty years period, from 462 primary tracheal disease patients, 67 patients were identified from our institutional medical registry as having received CPB, modified-CPB or ECMO during the procedure (26.9%, 22.4% and 50.7% respectively). Heparin free (n = 30, 44.8%) or low dose heparin (n = 17, 26.6%) therapy was frequently utilized in ECMO and modified-CPB group. The Median pump duration of CPB, modified-CPB, VV, and VA ECMO was 43, 64, 139, and 127 min. Anastomotic complications were significantly lower in the VV-ECMO group (7.1%), while the duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in the VA-ECMO group (66, [2-178]). Surgical bleeding was significantly higher in the CPB group (460 ± 73 ml). More patients in the CPB group (9/18) required blood transfusions; however, there was no significant difference in the volume of packed red blood cells between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite intraoperative ECLS being rarely used in tracheal and carinal disease, programmed extracorporeal life support with VV-ECMO demonstrated high effectiveness with an acceptable mortality and morbidity rate in high-risk tracheal surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12379321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Anesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03285-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12871-025-03285-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管在围手术期管理方面取得了进展,但接受复杂气管手术的患者仍然面临着发病率和死亡率增加的风险。体外生命支持(ECLS)可用于外科手术过程中维持血液动力学和呼吸稳定性,但目前尚无循证实践方案。本研究旨在评估各种ECLS模式在气管危重手术中的安全性和益处,并建立ECLS应用的实用方案。方法:单中心、回顾性、队列研究。这项回顾性研究收集了2000年1月至2020年12月期间接受ECLS气管手术的患者的数据。根据配置将患者分为体外循环(CPB)、改良体外循环(CPB)和体外膜氧合(ECMO)三组。评估和比较三组的基线特征、院内并发症、ECLS细节、不良事件和总生存率。结果:在20年的时间里,462例原发性气管疾病患者中,67例患者在我们的机构医疗登记中被确定为在手术期间接受了CPB、改良CPB或ECMO(分别为26.9%、22.4%和50.7%)。ECMO和改良cpb组多采用无肝素(n = 30, 44.8%)或低剂量肝素(n = 17, 26.6%)治疗。CPB、改良CPB、VV和VA ECMO的中位泵持续时间分别为43、64、139和127分钟。VV-ECMO组吻合口并发症明显较低(7.1%),而VA-ECMO组机械通气时间明显较长(66,[2-178])。CPB组手术出血明显高于对照组(460±73 ml)。CPB组需要输血的患者较多(9/18);然而,两组之间的红细胞堆积量没有显著差异。结论:尽管术中ECLS很少用于气管和隆鼻疾病,但VV-ECMO程序化体外生命支持在高危气管手术中具有较高的有效性,死亡率和发病率可接受。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Intraoperative extracorporeal life support in tracheal surgery: a 20-year single-center experience.

Intraoperative extracorporeal life support in tracheal surgery: a 20-year single-center experience.

Intraoperative extracorporeal life support in tracheal surgery: a 20-year single-center experience.

Background: Despite advancements in perioperative management, patients undergoing complex tracheal surgery still face increased risks of morbidity and mortality. Extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can be utilized to maintain hemodynamic and respiratory stability during surgical procedures, but there is currently no evidence-based practice protocol in place. This study seeks to evaluate the safety and benefits of various ECLS modes in critical tracheal surgery and establish a practical protocol for the application of ECLS.

Methods: Single center, retrospective, cohort study. This retrospective study collected data on patients who underwent tracheal procedures on ECLS between January 2000 and December 2020. Patients were divided into three groups according to configuration: cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), modified CPB and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Baseline characteristics, in-hospital complications, ECLS details, adverse events, and overall survival were assessed and compared between three groups.

Results: Over twenty years period, from 462 primary tracheal disease patients, 67 patients were identified from our institutional medical registry as having received CPB, modified-CPB or ECMO during the procedure (26.9%, 22.4% and 50.7% respectively). Heparin free (n = 30, 44.8%) or low dose heparin (n = 17, 26.6%) therapy was frequently utilized in ECMO and modified-CPB group. The Median pump duration of CPB, modified-CPB, VV, and VA ECMO was 43, 64, 139, and 127 min. Anastomotic complications were significantly lower in the VV-ECMO group (7.1%), while the duration of mechanical ventilation was significantly longer in the VA-ECMO group (66, [2-178]). Surgical bleeding was significantly higher in the CPB group (460 ± 73 ml). More patients in the CPB group (9/18) required blood transfusions; however, there was no significant difference in the volume of packed red blood cells between the groups.

Conclusion: Despite intraoperative ECLS being rarely used in tracheal and carinal disease, programmed extracorporeal life support with VV-ECMO demonstrated high effectiveness with an acceptable mortality and morbidity rate in high-risk tracheal surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Anesthesiology
BMC Anesthesiology ANESTHESIOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
349
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Anesthesiology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of anesthesiology, critical care, perioperative care and pain management, including clinical and experimental research into anesthetic mechanisms, administration and efficacy, technology and monitoring, and associated economic issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信