Carlos María Galmarini, Rafael Zamora, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo-Izquierdo, José Antonio De All, Juan Manuel Domínguez
{"title":"PROCC:一种预测评分,用于识别KRAS野生型转移性结直肠癌患者,这些患者可能从帕尼单抗治疗中获得生存获益。","authors":"Carlos María Galmarini, Rafael Zamora, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo-Izquierdo, José Antonio De All, Juan Manuel Domínguez","doi":"10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed \"PROCC\" to identify likely panitumumab responders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score (\"PROCC\"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.</p>","PeriodicalId":9243,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PROCC: a predictive score to identify KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are likely to obtain survival benefit from panitumumab treatment.\",\"authors\":\"Carlos María Galmarini, Rafael Zamora, Pablo Gómez Del Campo, José Del Castillo-Izquierdo, José Antonio De All, Juan Manuel Domínguez\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed \\\"PROCC\\\" to identify likely panitumumab responders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score (\\\"PROCC\\\"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"British Journal of Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:实践指南推荐帕尼单抗联合化疗治疗KRAS野生型(WT)转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者。然而,并不是所有的病人都对这种疗法有反应。我们提出一个称为“PROCC”的评分来识别可能的帕尼单抗反应。方法:训练(TRDS)和验证(VALDS)数据集包括接受帕尼单抗(P)加化疗(TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI)治疗的KRAS WT mCRC患者。TRDS包括36个不同的特征,用于生成通过机器学习(ML)分析的合成表征,以识别与PFS和OS相关的患者亚组。一个多变量逻辑回归模型确定了独立的预测因子,以制定预测评分。结果:ML鉴定出2个TRDS亚群:SP-A (n = 162)和SP-B (n = 298)。与FOLFOX4相比,只有P/FOLFOX4组SP-A患者的OS改善(HR 0.68; P = 0.04)。基线时的CEA、ALP、LDH和血小板用于创建预测评分(PROCC)。TRDS评分曲线下面积为0.81。与FOLFOX4相比,p /FOLFOX4的PROCC≥8.5与较低的进展风险(HR 0.67, p = 0.03)和死亡风险(HR 0.65, p = 0.04)相关。VALDS的验证证实了FOLFIRI的类似结果。结论:基于四个基线参数,PROCC可以指导KRAS WT mCRC患者最有可能从帕尼单抗中获益的选择。
PROCC: a predictive score to identify KRAS wild type metastatic colorectal cancer patients who are likely to obtain survival benefit from panitumumab treatment.
Background: Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed "PROCC" to identify likely panitumumab responders.
Methods: The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.
Results: ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score ("PROCC"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.
Conclusions: Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.
期刊介绍:
The British Journal of Cancer is one of the most-cited general cancer journals, publishing significant advances in translational and clinical cancer research.It also publishes high-quality reviews and thought-provoking comment on all aspects of cancer prevention,diagnosis and treatment.