补充水果冰沙对接受阿片激动剂治疗的阿片依赖患者心理困扰和生物标志物的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Elaheh Javadi Arjmand, Lise Margrete Thomassen, Karl Trygve Druckrey-Fiskaaen, Einar Furulund, Jørn Henrik Vold, Tesfaye Madebo, Rune Blomhoff, Jan Tore Daltveit, Hege Berg Henriksen, Fatemeh Chalabianloo, Kjell Arne Johansen, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Lars Thore Fadnes
{"title":"补充水果冰沙对接受阿片激动剂治疗的阿片依赖患者心理困扰和生物标志物的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"Elaheh Javadi Arjmand, Lise Margrete Thomassen, Karl Trygve Druckrey-Fiskaaen, Einar Furulund, Jørn Henrik Vold, Tesfaye Madebo, Rune Blomhoff, Jan Tore Daltveit, Hege Berg Henriksen, Fatemeh Chalabianloo, Kjell Arne Johansen, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Lars Thore Fadnes","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04347-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy diets are common among individuals with opioid dependence. While fruit- and vegetable-rich diets have shown mental health benefits, evidence is limited for those receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT). This trial evaluated the effectiveness of fruit smoothie supplementation for people receiving OAT compared to standard treatment without fruit smoothie supplementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter randomized controlled trial (FruktBAR), 311 participants receiving OAT were randomized (5:3 intervention:control) to receive either a daily 250 ml fruit smoothie for 16 weeks in addition to standard OAT or standard OAT alone. The primary outcome was the difference between the arms in changes in psychological distress, measured by the ten-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-10%) from baseline to the end of the intervention. The secondary outcomes included changes in fatigue symptoms, measured using the three-item Fatigue Severity Scale, physical fitness, measured by a 4-min step test, carotenoid and folate biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 131 participants (70%) in the intervention arm and 91 (73%) in the control arm had a low intake of fruits and vegetables. In the intervention arm, the mean SCL-10% score at baseline was 43.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40.4, 47.4), which was reduced to 41.6% (CI: 38.0, 5.1) at the end of the trial. In the control arm, the mean SCL-10% score was 43.6% at baseline (CI: 39.3, 48.0) and decreased to 41.5% (CI: 37.1, 45.8) at the end of the trial period. No significant difference in the change of psychological distress between the intervention and control arms was found (- 0.14%; CI: - 4.49, 2.22). Additionally, no changes were found between the intervention and control arms regarding fatigue symptoms, physical fitness, carotenoid, or folate biomarkers. The mean consumed fruit smoothies reported in the intervention arm was 3.9 bottles per week (SD 1.5).  CONCLUSIONS: Fruit smoothie supplementation over a 16-week period did not impact psychological distress, fatigue, physical fitness, carotenoids, or folate biomarkers among people receiving OAT. Although the smoothies were successfully delivered to the participants, our data indicates suboptimal adherence to the intervention rather than the lack of efficacy.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05229770. Registered on 08 February 2022.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"505"},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of fruit smoothie supplementation on psychological distress and biomarkers among people with opioid dependence receiving opioid agonist therapy: a randomized controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"Elaheh Javadi Arjmand, Lise Margrete Thomassen, Karl Trygve Druckrey-Fiskaaen, Einar Furulund, Jørn Henrik Vold, Tesfaye Madebo, Rune Blomhoff, Jan Tore Daltveit, Hege Berg Henriksen, Fatemeh Chalabianloo, Kjell Arne Johansen, Torgeir Gilje Lid, Lars Thore Fadnes\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-04347-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Unhealthy diets are common among individuals with opioid dependence. While fruit- and vegetable-rich diets have shown mental health benefits, evidence is limited for those receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT). This trial evaluated the effectiveness of fruit smoothie supplementation for people receiving OAT compared to standard treatment without fruit smoothie supplementation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this multicenter randomized controlled trial (FruktBAR), 311 participants receiving OAT were randomized (5:3 intervention:control) to receive either a daily 250 ml fruit smoothie for 16 weeks in addition to standard OAT or standard OAT alone. The primary outcome was the difference between the arms in changes in psychological distress, measured by the ten-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-10%) from baseline to the end of the intervention. The secondary outcomes included changes in fatigue symptoms, measured using the three-item Fatigue Severity Scale, physical fitness, measured by a 4-min step test, carotenoid and folate biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, 131 participants (70%) in the intervention arm and 91 (73%) in the control arm had a low intake of fruits and vegetables. In the intervention arm, the mean SCL-10% score at baseline was 43.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40.4, 47.4), which was reduced to 41.6% (CI: 38.0, 5.1) at the end of the trial. In the control arm, the mean SCL-10% score was 43.6% at baseline (CI: 39.3, 48.0) and decreased to 41.5% (CI: 37.1, 45.8) at the end of the trial period. No significant difference in the change of psychological distress between the intervention and control arms was found (- 0.14%; CI: - 4.49, 2.22). Additionally, no changes were found between the intervention and control arms regarding fatigue symptoms, physical fitness, carotenoid, or folate biomarkers. The mean consumed fruit smoothies reported in the intervention arm was 3.9 bottles per week (SD 1.5).  CONCLUSIONS: Fruit smoothie supplementation over a 16-week period did not impact psychological distress, fatigue, physical fitness, carotenoids, or folate biomarkers among people receiving OAT. Although the smoothies were successfully delivered to the participants, our data indicates suboptimal adherence to the intervention rather than the lack of efficacy.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05229770. Registered on 08 February 2022.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12395640/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04347-w\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04347-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:不健康饮食在阿片类药物依赖个体中很常见。虽然富含水果和蔬菜的饮食显示出心理健康益处,但对于接受阿片类激动剂治疗(OAT)的人来说,证据有限。该试验评估了补充水果冰沙对接受OAT治疗的人的有效性,并与不补充水果冰沙的标准治疗进行了比较。方法:在这个多中心随机对照试验(FruktBAR)中,311名接受OAT的参与者被随机分配(5:3干预:对照组),在标准OAT的基础上每天接受250毫升水果奶昔,持续16周,或单独接受标准OAT。主要结果是两组在心理困扰变化方面的差异,通过十项霍普金斯症状检查表(SCL-10%)从基线到干预结束来测量。次要结果包括疲劳症状的变化,使用三项疲劳严重程度量表测量,身体健康,通过4分钟步测试测量,类胡萝卜素和叶酸生物标志物。结果:在基线时,干预组131名参与者(70%)和对照组91名参与者(73%)的水果和蔬菜摄入量较低。在干预组,基线时的平均SCL-10%评分为43.9%(95%可信区间(CI): 40.4, 47.4),在试验结束时降至41.6% (CI: 38.0, 5.1)。在对照组中,平均SCL-10%评分在基线时为43.6% (CI: 39.3, 48.0),在试验结束时降至41.5% (CI: 37.1, 45.8)。干预组与对照组的心理困扰变化无显著差异(- 0.14%;CI: - 4.49, 2.22)。此外,干预组和对照组之间在疲劳症状、身体健康、类胡萝卜素或叶酸生物标志物方面没有发现变化。干预组报告的平均水果冰沙消费量为每周3.9瓶(标准差1.5)。结论:在接受OAT治疗的人群中,在16周的时间内补充水果奶昔对心理困扰、疲劳、身体健康、类胡萝卜素或叶酸生物标志物没有影响。虽然冰沙成功地送到了参与者手中,但我们的数据表明,干预的依从性不是最优的,而是缺乏疗效。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05229770。注册于2022年2月8日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The effect of fruit smoothie supplementation on psychological distress and biomarkers among people with opioid dependence receiving opioid agonist therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

The effect of fruit smoothie supplementation on psychological distress and biomarkers among people with opioid dependence receiving opioid agonist therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

The effect of fruit smoothie supplementation on psychological distress and biomarkers among people with opioid dependence receiving opioid agonist therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

The effect of fruit smoothie supplementation on psychological distress and biomarkers among people with opioid dependence receiving opioid agonist therapy: a randomized controlled trial.

Background: Unhealthy diets are common among individuals with opioid dependence. While fruit- and vegetable-rich diets have shown mental health benefits, evidence is limited for those receiving opioid agonist therapy (OAT). This trial evaluated the effectiveness of fruit smoothie supplementation for people receiving OAT compared to standard treatment without fruit smoothie supplementation.

Methods: In this multicenter randomized controlled trial (FruktBAR), 311 participants receiving OAT were randomized (5:3 intervention:control) to receive either a daily 250 ml fruit smoothie for 16 weeks in addition to standard OAT or standard OAT alone. The primary outcome was the difference between the arms in changes in psychological distress, measured by the ten-item Hopkins Symptom Checklist (SCL-10%) from baseline to the end of the intervention. The secondary outcomes included changes in fatigue symptoms, measured using the three-item Fatigue Severity Scale, physical fitness, measured by a 4-min step test, carotenoid and folate biomarkers.

Results: At baseline, 131 participants (70%) in the intervention arm and 91 (73%) in the control arm had a low intake of fruits and vegetables. In the intervention arm, the mean SCL-10% score at baseline was 43.9% (95% confidence interval (CI): 40.4, 47.4), which was reduced to 41.6% (CI: 38.0, 5.1) at the end of the trial. In the control arm, the mean SCL-10% score was 43.6% at baseline (CI: 39.3, 48.0) and decreased to 41.5% (CI: 37.1, 45.8) at the end of the trial period. No significant difference in the change of psychological distress between the intervention and control arms was found (- 0.14%; CI: - 4.49, 2.22). Additionally, no changes were found between the intervention and control arms regarding fatigue symptoms, physical fitness, carotenoid, or folate biomarkers. The mean consumed fruit smoothies reported in the intervention arm was 3.9 bottles per week (SD 1.5).  CONCLUSIONS: Fruit smoothie supplementation over a 16-week period did not impact psychological distress, fatigue, physical fitness, carotenoids, or folate biomarkers among people receiving OAT. Although the smoothies were successfully delivered to the participants, our data indicates suboptimal adherence to the intervention rather than the lack of efficacy.  TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05229770. Registered on 08 February 2022.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信