重视各群体的健康:不丹基于人口的支付意愿横断面调查。

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Ying Yao, Md Mizanur Rahman, Pempa, Yot Teerawattananon, Ryota Nakamura
{"title":"重视各群体的健康:不丹基于人口的支付意愿横断面调查。","authors":"Ying Yao, Md Mizanur Rahman, Pempa, Yot Teerawattananon, Ryota Nakamura","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Context-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) informed by societal willingness to pay (WTP) are crucial for healthcare resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries. This study investigated WTP for health per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Bhutan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A WTP survey was conducted alongside the 2023 National Health Survey in Bhutan, sampling 1869 households. Using contingent valuation, respondents assigned monetary values to three hypothetical scenarios: 1 year of cancer symptom-free life, 1 year of perfect health and 5 years of perfect health. We used generalised linear regression to estimate WTP, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and health-related factors, as well as elicitation methods. Multilevel analyses examined WTP variations within and between districts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WTP estimates were 76 836 Bhutanese ngultrum (BTN) (0.26 times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita; 95% CI: 71 397 to 82 275) for a year without cancer symptoms, 104 381 BTN (0.35 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 96 405 to 112 357) for 1 QALY and 235 237 BTN (0.78 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 218 674 to 251 800) for 5 QALYs. WTP variations were driven by within-district individual characteristics, particularly income and education, rather than between-district differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimal between-district WTP variations support a national-level CET for Bhutan. However, WTP-based CETs would be biased upward by wealthier and more educated groups. This bias could justify expensive technologies that strain public resources in Bhutan's government-funded healthcare system.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374658/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Valuing health across groups: a cross-sectional population-based willingness-to-pay survey in Bhutan.\",\"authors\":\"Ying Yao, Md Mizanur Rahman, Pempa, Yot Teerawattananon, Ryota Nakamura\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019098\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Context-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) informed by societal willingness to pay (WTP) are crucial for healthcare resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries. This study investigated WTP for health per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Bhutan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A WTP survey was conducted alongside the 2023 National Health Survey in Bhutan, sampling 1869 households. Using contingent valuation, respondents assigned monetary values to three hypothetical scenarios: 1 year of cancer symptom-free life, 1 year of perfect health and 5 years of perfect health. We used generalised linear regression to estimate WTP, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and health-related factors, as well as elicitation methods. Multilevel analyses examined WTP variations within and between districts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>WTP estimates were 76 836 Bhutanese ngultrum (BTN) (0.26 times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita; 95% CI: 71 397 to 82 275) for a year without cancer symptoms, 104 381 BTN (0.35 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 96 405 to 112 357) for 1 QALY and 235 237 BTN (0.78 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 218 674 to 251 800) for 5 QALYs. WTP variations were driven by within-district individual characteristics, particularly income and education, rather than between-district differences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Minimal between-district WTP variations support a national-level CET for Bhutan. However, WTP-based CETs would be biased upward by wealthier and more educated groups. This bias could justify expensive technologies that strain public resources in Bhutan's government-funded healthcare system.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374658/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019098\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2025-019098","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

由社会支付意愿(WTP)决定的特定环境成本效益阈值(CETs)对于低收入和中等收入国家的医疗资源分配至关重要。本研究调查了不丹每个质量调整生命年(QALY)的WTP健康状况。方法:在不丹进行2023年全国健康调查的同时,对1869户家庭进行了WTP调查。使用条件评估,受访者将货币价值分配给三种假设情景:1年无癌症症状生活,1年完全健康和5年完全健康。我们使用广义线性回归来估计WTP,控制了人口统计学、社会经济和健康相关因素,以及启发方法。多水平分析检查了地区内部和地区之间的WTP差异。结果:WTP估计为76 836不丹元(BTN)(人均国内生产总值(GDP)的0.26倍);1个QALY为104 381 BTN(人均GDP的0.35倍;95% CI: 96 405至112 357),5个QALY为235 237 BTN(人均GDP的0.78倍;95% CI: 218 674至251 800)。WTP的变化是由地区内的个体特征驱动的,特别是收入和教育,而不是地区之间的差异。结论:最小的地区间WTP差异支持不丹的国家级CET。然而,以wtp为基础的英语考试将被富裕和受教育程度更高的群体所偏爱。这种偏见可以证明昂贵的技术会给不丹政府资助的医疗保健系统的公共资源带来压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Valuing health across groups: a cross-sectional population-based willingness-to-pay survey in Bhutan.

Valuing health across groups: a cross-sectional population-based willingness-to-pay survey in Bhutan.

Introduction: Context-specific cost-effectiveness thresholds (CETs) informed by societal willingness to pay (WTP) are crucial for healthcare resource allocation in low- and middle-income countries. This study investigated WTP for health per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in Bhutan.

Methods: A WTP survey was conducted alongside the 2023 National Health Survey in Bhutan, sampling 1869 households. Using contingent valuation, respondents assigned monetary values to three hypothetical scenarios: 1 year of cancer symptom-free life, 1 year of perfect health and 5 years of perfect health. We used generalised linear regression to estimate WTP, controlling for demographic, socioeconomic and health-related factors, as well as elicitation methods. Multilevel analyses examined WTP variations within and between districts.

Results: WTP estimates were 76 836 Bhutanese ngultrum (BTN) (0.26 times gross domestic product (GDP) per capita; 95% CI: 71 397 to 82 275) for a year without cancer symptoms, 104 381 BTN (0.35 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 96 405 to 112 357) for 1 QALY and 235 237 BTN (0.78 times GDP per capita; 95% CI: 218 674 to 251 800) for 5 QALYs. WTP variations were driven by within-district individual characteristics, particularly income and education, rather than between-district differences.

Conclusion: Minimal between-district WTP variations support a national-level CET for Bhutan. However, WTP-based CETs would be biased upward by wealthier and more educated groups. This bias could justify expensive technologies that strain public resources in Bhutan's government-funded healthcare system.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信