肯尼亚西部常见精神障碍门诊患者氟西汀依从性的相关因素

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Rachel L Burger, Susan M Meffert, Linnet Ongeri, Josline Wangia, Raphael Wambura, Phanice Ajore, Grace Rota, Ammon Otieno, Raymond R Obura, Peter Muchembre, David Bukusi, Anne Mbwayo, Thomas C Neylan, Dickens Akena, Chengshi Jin, Charles McCulloch, Muthoni A Mathai
{"title":"肯尼亚西部常见精神障碍门诊患者氟西汀依从性的相关因素","authors":"Rachel L Burger, Susan M Meffert, Linnet Ongeri, Josline Wangia, Raphael Wambura, Phanice Ajore, Grace Rota, Ammon Otieno, Raymond R Obura, Peter Muchembre, David Bukusi, Anne Mbwayo, Thomas C Neylan, Dickens Akena, Chengshi Jin, Charles McCulloch, Muthoni A Mathai","doi":"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017929","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-adherence to antidepressants has been linked to increased symptom severity, relapse and hospitalisation from common mental disorders. However, there is limited knowledge of factors associated with antidepressant adherence in low-income and middle-income countries, especially in public sector, primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We quantified fluoxetine adherence using the medication possession ratio. A limitation of this measure is that it does not always reflect the ingestion of medication. We constructed a generalised estimating equations linear regression with robust SEs, clustered by the participant, to identify independent predictors of fluoxetine adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants randomised to fluoxetine were dispensed an average of 126 daily doses, or 70% of the 180 possible doses. Adherence was higher in the first half of the treatment period at 86.3%, 95% CI (83.5% to 89.2%) compared with 46.5% in the second half (44.3% to 48.8%) (p<0.001). Participants who opted for community-delivered fluoxetine demonstrated adherence at 79.7% (77.0% to 82.4%) compared with 58.6% (55.7% to 61.5%) of those who only picked up medication at the facility (p<0.001). Use of mHealth for at least one but less than half of the visits had the highest level of adherence at 84.6% (82.4% to 86.9%) compared with 49.6% (46.1% to 53.0%) among those who did not use mHealth and 67.2% (62.5% to 72.0%) for those who used mHealth at least half their visits (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to fluoxetine was high relative to existing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors adherence data, the majority of which is from high-income countries. Adherence was higher during the first half of treatment. People who were older, living with HIV and opted to use community delivery of medication and/or mHealth had higher adherence.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03466346.</p>","PeriodicalId":9137,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Global Health","volume":"10 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with fluoxetine adherence among outpatients with common mental disorders in Western Kenya.\",\"authors\":\"Rachel L Burger, Susan M Meffert, Linnet Ongeri, Josline Wangia, Raphael Wambura, Phanice Ajore, Grace Rota, Ammon Otieno, Raymond R Obura, Peter Muchembre, David Bukusi, Anne Mbwayo, Thomas C Neylan, Dickens Akena, Chengshi Jin, Charles McCulloch, Muthoni A Mathai\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017929\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Non-adherence to antidepressants has been linked to increased symptom severity, relapse and hospitalisation from common mental disorders. However, there is limited knowledge of factors associated with antidepressant adherence in low-income and middle-income countries, especially in public sector, primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We quantified fluoxetine adherence using the medication possession ratio. A limitation of this measure is that it does not always reflect the ingestion of medication. We constructed a generalised estimating equations linear regression with robust SEs, clustered by the participant, to identify independent predictors of fluoxetine adherence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants randomised to fluoxetine were dispensed an average of 126 daily doses, or 70% of the 180 possible doses. Adherence was higher in the first half of the treatment period at 86.3%, 95% CI (83.5% to 89.2%) compared with 46.5% in the second half (44.3% to 48.8%) (p<0.001). Participants who opted for community-delivered fluoxetine demonstrated adherence at 79.7% (77.0% to 82.4%) compared with 58.6% (55.7% to 61.5%) of those who only picked up medication at the facility (p<0.001). Use of mHealth for at least one but less than half of the visits had the highest level of adherence at 84.6% (82.4% to 86.9%) compared with 49.6% (46.1% to 53.0%) among those who did not use mHealth and 67.2% (62.5% to 72.0%) for those who used mHealth at least half their visits (p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adherence to fluoxetine was high relative to existing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors adherence data, the majority of which is from high-income countries. Adherence was higher during the first half of treatment. People who were older, living with HIV and opted to use community delivery of medication and/or mHealth had higher adherence.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>NCT03466346.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9137,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"volume\":\"10 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12382546/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017929\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2024-017929","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:不坚持服用抗抑郁药与常见精神障碍的症状严重程度增加、复发和住院有关。然而,在低收入和中等收入国家,特别是在公共部门和初级保健机构,对与抗抑郁药依从性相关的因素的了解有限。方法:采用药物占有比对氟西汀依从性进行定量分析。这种方法的局限性在于它并不总是反映药物的摄入情况。我们构建了一个广义估计方程线性回归与稳健的se,由参与者聚类,以确定氟西汀依从性的独立预测因子。结果:随机分配到氟西汀的参与者平均每天分配126剂量,或180可能剂量的70%。治疗前半期的依从性较高,为86.3%,95% CI(83.5%至89.2%),而后半期的依从性为46.5%(44.3%至48.8%)。结论:相对于现有选择性血清素再摄取抑制剂的依从性数据,氟西汀的依从性较高,其中大部分来自高收入国家。在治疗的前半期,依从性更高。老年人、艾滋病毒感染者和选择使用社区提供的药物和/或移动健康的人有更高的依从性。试验注册号:NCT03466346。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Factors associated with fluoxetine adherence among outpatients with common mental disorders in Western Kenya.

Factors associated with fluoxetine adherence among outpatients with common mental disorders in Western Kenya.

Objective: Non-adherence to antidepressants has been linked to increased symptom severity, relapse and hospitalisation from common mental disorders. However, there is limited knowledge of factors associated with antidepressant adherence in low-income and middle-income countries, especially in public sector, primary care settings.

Methods: We quantified fluoxetine adherence using the medication possession ratio. A limitation of this measure is that it does not always reflect the ingestion of medication. We constructed a generalised estimating equations linear regression with robust SEs, clustered by the participant, to identify independent predictors of fluoxetine adherence.

Results: Participants randomised to fluoxetine were dispensed an average of 126 daily doses, or 70% of the 180 possible doses. Adherence was higher in the first half of the treatment period at 86.3%, 95% CI (83.5% to 89.2%) compared with 46.5% in the second half (44.3% to 48.8%) (p<0.001). Participants who opted for community-delivered fluoxetine demonstrated adherence at 79.7% (77.0% to 82.4%) compared with 58.6% (55.7% to 61.5%) of those who only picked up medication at the facility (p<0.001). Use of mHealth for at least one but less than half of the visits had the highest level of adherence at 84.6% (82.4% to 86.9%) compared with 49.6% (46.1% to 53.0%) among those who did not use mHealth and 67.2% (62.5% to 72.0%) for those who used mHealth at least half their visits (p<0.001).

Conclusions: Adherence to fluoxetine was high relative to existing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors adherence data, the majority of which is from high-income countries. Adherence was higher during the first half of treatment. People who were older, living with HIV and opted to use community delivery of medication and/or mHealth had higher adherence.

Trial registration number: NCT03466346.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Global Health
BMJ Global Health Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
429
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Global Health is an online Open Access journal from BMJ that focuses on publishing high-quality peer-reviewed content pertinent to individuals engaged in global health, including policy makers, funders, researchers, clinicians, and frontline healthcare workers. The journal encompasses all facets of global health, with a special emphasis on submissions addressing underfunded areas such as non-communicable diseases (NCDs). It welcomes research across all study phases and designs, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialized studies. The journal also encourages opinionated discussions on controversial topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信