从服务用户和医疗保健专业人员的角度评估拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版的实施情况:一项问卷调查研究。

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Kate Widdows, Holly Reid, Debbie M Smith, Rebecca Wood-Harper, Elizabeth Camacho, Stephen A Roberts, Alexander E P Heazell
{"title":"从服务用户和医疗保健专业人员的角度评估拯救婴儿生命护理包第2版的实施情况:一项问卷调查研究。","authors":"Kate Widdows, Holly Reid, Debbie M Smith, Rebecca Wood-Harper, Elizabeth Camacho, Stephen A Roberts, Alexander E P Heazell","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCB) was introduced in England in 2015 and was updated in 2019 (SBLCBv2). This study aimed to describe the degree to which SBLCBv2 was implemented in practice and describe contemporary experiences of receiving and delivering antenatal and intrapartum care informed by the recommendations of SBLCBv2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 28 National Health Service maternity units across England between October and December 2023. The study had two arms, one for maternity service users and one for healthcare professionals. Maternity service users aged ≥16 years who had given birth in the last 12 months were invited to participate in an online survey which contained closed questions about elements of the SBLCBv2, and two free-text questions about their experiences of receiving antenatal and intrapartum care. Maternity healthcare professionals from participating sites were invited to complete a separate questionnaire about delivering care. Responses were summarised by descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1140 women and 633 healthcare professionals participated. The majority of staff reported implementing all five elements of SBLCBv2, though this varied from 57% (prevention of preterm birth) to 99% (smoking cessation). Service users frequently reported receiving interventions that were part of SBLCBv2: 26% were offered Aspirin and 97% monitored fetal movement. Staff generally reported positive experiences of implementing the SBLCBv2, feeling that it supported clinical decision making. 89% and 86% of service users reported a positive experience in pregnancy and labour, respectively. This was underpinned by positive staff attitudes, behaviours and communication, and being listened to and involved in decisions about care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBLCBv2 has been integrated into clinical practice, though some elements require additional focus to increase implementation (e.g., preterm birth). Maternity staff may benefit from additional training to discuss the reasons for and results of interventions to reduce the risk of pregnancy complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals' perspectives: a questionnaire study.\",\"authors\":\"Kate Widdows, Holly Reid, Debbie M Smith, Rebecca Wood-Harper, Elizabeth Camacho, Stephen A Roberts, Alexander E P Heazell\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCB) was introduced in England in 2015 and was updated in 2019 (SBLCBv2). This study aimed to describe the degree to which SBLCBv2 was implemented in practice and describe contemporary experiences of receiving and delivering antenatal and intrapartum care informed by the recommendations of SBLCBv2.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 28 National Health Service maternity units across England between October and December 2023. The study had two arms, one for maternity service users and one for healthcare professionals. Maternity service users aged ≥16 years who had given birth in the last 12 months were invited to participate in an online survey which contained closed questions about elements of the SBLCBv2, and two free-text questions about their experiences of receiving antenatal and intrapartum care. Maternity healthcare professionals from participating sites were invited to complete a separate questionnaire about delivering care. Responses were summarised by descriptive statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>1140 women and 633 healthcare professionals participated. The majority of staff reported implementing all five elements of SBLCBv2, though this varied from 57% (prevention of preterm birth) to 99% (smoking cessation). Service users frequently reported receiving interventions that were part of SBLCBv2: 26% were offered Aspirin and 97% monitored fetal movement. Staff generally reported positive experiences of implementing the SBLCBv2, feeling that it supported clinical decision making. 89% and 86% of service users reported a positive experience in pregnancy and labour, respectively. This was underpinned by positive staff attitudes, behaviours and communication, and being listened to and involved in decisions about care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SBLCBv2 has been integrated into clinical practice, though some elements require additional focus to increase implementation (e.g., preterm birth). Maternity staff may benefit from additional training to discuss the reasons for and results of interventions to reduce the risk of pregnancy complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12410671/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003456","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:拯救婴儿生命护理包(SBLCB)于2015年在英国推出,并于2019年更新(SBLCBv2)。本研究旨在描述SBLCBv2在实践中的实施程度,并描述根据SBLCBv2建议接受和提供产前和分娩护理的当代经验。方法:本横断面问卷研究于2023年10月至12月在英格兰28个国家卫生服务产科单位进行。这项研究分为两组,一组针对产妇服务使用者,另一组针对医疗保健专业人员。邀请在过去12个月内分娩的年龄≥16岁的产妇服务用户参加一项在线调查,该调查包含关于SBLCBv2要素的封闭式问题,以及关于其接受产前和分娩期间护理经历的两个自由文本问题。来自参与地点的产妇保健专业人员被邀请完成一份关于提供护理的单独问卷。用描述性统计对回答进行总结。结果:1140名妇女和633名保健专业人员参与。大多数工作人员报告实施了SBLCBv2的所有五个要素,尽管这一比例从57%(预防早产)到99%(戒烟)不等。服务使用者经常报告接受了SBLCBv2的干预措施:26%的人接受了阿司匹林,97%的人接受了胎儿运动监测。工作人员普遍报告了实施SBLCBv2的积极经验,认为它支持了临床决策。89%和86%的服务使用者分别报告了怀孕和分娩的积极经历。这得益于积极的工作人员态度、行为和沟通,以及倾听和参与有关护理的决策。结论:SBLCBv2已被纳入临床实践,尽管一些因素需要额外的关注来增加实施(例如早产)。产科工作人员可能受益于额外的培训,讨论干预措施的原因和结果,以减少妊娠并发症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating the implementation of the Saving Babies Lives Care Bundle Version 2 from service user and healthcare professionals' perspectives: a questionnaire study.

Introduction: The Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCB) was introduced in England in 2015 and was updated in 2019 (SBLCBv2). This study aimed to describe the degree to which SBLCBv2 was implemented in practice and describe contemporary experiences of receiving and delivering antenatal and intrapartum care informed by the recommendations of SBLCBv2.

Methods: This cross-sectional questionnaire study was conducted in 28 National Health Service maternity units across England between October and December 2023. The study had two arms, one for maternity service users and one for healthcare professionals. Maternity service users aged ≥16 years who had given birth in the last 12 months were invited to participate in an online survey which contained closed questions about elements of the SBLCBv2, and two free-text questions about their experiences of receiving antenatal and intrapartum care. Maternity healthcare professionals from participating sites were invited to complete a separate questionnaire about delivering care. Responses were summarised by descriptive statistics.

Results: 1140 women and 633 healthcare professionals participated. The majority of staff reported implementing all five elements of SBLCBv2, though this varied from 57% (prevention of preterm birth) to 99% (smoking cessation). Service users frequently reported receiving interventions that were part of SBLCBv2: 26% were offered Aspirin and 97% monitored fetal movement. Staff generally reported positive experiences of implementing the SBLCBv2, feeling that it supported clinical decision making. 89% and 86% of service users reported a positive experience in pregnancy and labour, respectively. This was underpinned by positive staff attitudes, behaviours and communication, and being listened to and involved in decisions about care.

Conclusions: SBLCBv2 has been integrated into clinical practice, though some elements require additional focus to increase implementation (e.g., preterm birth). Maternity staff may benefit from additional training to discuss the reasons for and results of interventions to reduce the risk of pregnancy complications.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信