Laurence Nathalie Irene Frei, Naomi Carlisle, Zoe Manton, Mareike Bolten, Helena A Watson
{"title":"任务转移:改善对有早产风险妇女的护理的一个关键方面。","authors":"Laurence Nathalie Irene Frei, Naomi Carlisle, Zoe Manton, Mareike Bolten, Helena A Watson","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Until April 2021, women presenting to maternity triage with symptoms of threatened preterm labour (TPTL) and/or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) were triaged by a doctor. Depending on the acuity on the labour ward, women in triage often had a long wait for a doctor's review. These delays create anxiety for women and impair the capacity of triage midwives to care for other women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement was used for this project. 3 months prior to the intervention, the baseline assessment was women's wait time for medical review when presenting with TPTL and/or PPROM.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Triage midwives were trained in performing speculum examination on preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) women to allow quicker review. Waiting time for review by a midwife vs doctor was compared using data collected between January and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>88 eligible women were identified. 44 cases (intervention group) had their initial assessment by the triage midwife, while 44 cases (control group) had their initial assessment by a doctor. The mean waiting time between arrival and performance of quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) in the intervention group was 67 min (SD=42.7), compared with 127 min (SD=61.2) in the control group (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the waiting time between arrival and discharge/admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women presenting with symptoms of TPTL are reviewed on average twice as quickly by the triage midwife compared with a doctor, allowing a quick reassurance for those where TPTL/PPROM has been excluded. However, the overall waiting time in triage was similar, as women in our unit currently need a doctor's review before discharge.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374630/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Task shifting: a key aspect to improving care for women at risk of preterm birth.\",\"authors\":\"Laurence Nathalie Irene Frei, Naomi Carlisle, Zoe Manton, Mareike Bolten, Helena A Watson\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Local problem: </strong>Until April 2021, women presenting to maternity triage with symptoms of threatened preterm labour (TPTL) and/or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) were triaged by a doctor. Depending on the acuity on the labour ward, women in triage often had a long wait for a doctor's review. These delays create anxiety for women and impair the capacity of triage midwives to care for other women.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement was used for this project. 3 months prior to the intervention, the baseline assessment was women's wait time for medical review when presenting with TPTL and/or PPROM.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Triage midwives were trained in performing speculum examination on preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) women to allow quicker review. Waiting time for review by a midwife vs doctor was compared using data collected between January and December 2021.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>88 eligible women were identified. 44 cases (intervention group) had their initial assessment by the triage midwife, while 44 cases (control group) had their initial assessment by a doctor. The mean waiting time between arrival and performance of quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) in the intervention group was 67 min (SD=42.7), compared with 127 min (SD=61.2) in the control group (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the waiting time between arrival and discharge/admission.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Women presenting with symptoms of TPTL are reviewed on average twice as quickly by the triage midwife compared with a doctor, allowing a quick reassurance for those where TPTL/PPROM has been excluded. However, the overall waiting time in triage was similar, as women in our unit currently need a doctor's review before discharge.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12374630/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Quality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2024-003104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Task shifting: a key aspect to improving care for women at risk of preterm birth.
Local problem: Until April 2021, women presenting to maternity triage with symptoms of threatened preterm labour (TPTL) and/or preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) were triaged by a doctor. Depending on the acuity on the labour ward, women in triage often had a long wait for a doctor's review. These delays create anxiety for women and impair the capacity of triage midwives to care for other women.
Methods: The Plan-Do-Study-Act method of quality improvement was used for this project. 3 months prior to the intervention, the baseline assessment was women's wait time for medical review when presenting with TPTL and/or PPROM.
Intervention: Triage midwives were trained in performing speculum examination on preterm (<37 weeks' gestation) women to allow quicker review. Waiting time for review by a midwife vs doctor was compared using data collected between January and December 2021.
Results: 88 eligible women were identified. 44 cases (intervention group) had their initial assessment by the triage midwife, while 44 cases (control group) had their initial assessment by a doctor. The mean waiting time between arrival and performance of quantitative fetal fibronectin (qfFN) in the intervention group was 67 min (SD=42.7), compared with 127 min (SD=61.2) in the control group (p<0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the waiting time between arrival and discharge/admission.
Conclusion: Women presenting with symptoms of TPTL are reviewed on average twice as quickly by the triage midwife compared with a doctor, allowing a quick reassurance for those where TPTL/PPROM has been excluded. However, the overall waiting time in triage was similar, as women in our unit currently need a doctor's review before discharge.