对荷兰急诊护理工作量的看法及其影响:一项定性研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Ties Eikendal, Naomi Prudon, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Patrick Jeurissen, Menno Iskander Gaakeer, Bas de Groot, Simone A van Dulmen
{"title":"对荷兰急诊护理工作量的看法及其影响:一项定性研究。","authors":"Ties Eikendal, Naomi Prudon, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Patrick Jeurissen, Menno Iskander Gaakeer, Bas de Groot, Simone A van Dulmen","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01334-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate staffing and manageable workloads are crucial for high-quality emergency care. However, high perceived workloads in the emergency department (ED) threaten both. Increased demand and staff shortages intensify these issues and cause crowding. Understanding healthcare workers' perspectives on workload is essential for effective policymaking and maintaining a durable workforce. The objective of this study was to explore the current perceived workload of ED professionals, and their vision on how to influence it and to understand the healthcare worker's perspective on proposed healthcare reforms in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitive study using semi-structured interviews with 33 healthcare professionals (ED physicians, physician assistants and nurses) working in a university medical center, and three general hospitals from March-July 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interview transcripts were coded. An inductive content analysis was performed, where codes were assigned to the transcripts and adjusted. Codes were then sorted into themes on causes of workload, consequences and proposed solutions for reducing the workload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emergency department professionals identified increasing patient inflow, barriers to patient throughput and output, and staff shortages as key workload causes. Consequences included increased time, mental and psychological demands, leading to stress and reduced job satisfaction. A well-coordinated team and having social interaction with colleagues is seen as a key part of the profession by ED-professionals. Next to that, training and development opportunities contribute to job satisfaction. Proposed solutions involved public education, improved care coordination, technological innovations, and enhanced collaboration within and among hospitals to improve efficiency and job satisfaction, and to reduce perceived workload pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing perceived workload is crucial for maintaining quality and accessibility of care. Dutch ED professionals face a high workload leading to stress and lower job satisfaction. To ensure successful changes, adequate preconditions and engaging healthcare professionals in decision-making are crucial. In future research, a stronger focus on effective work habits and processes, including provider satisfaction and workplace well-being, is necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403633/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perceptions of workload in emergency care in the Netherlands and how to influence this: a qualitative study.\",\"authors\":\"Ties Eikendal, Naomi Prudon, Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Patrick Jeurissen, Menno Iskander Gaakeer, Bas de Groot, Simone A van Dulmen\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01334-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Adequate staffing and manageable workloads are crucial for high-quality emergency care. However, high perceived workloads in the emergency department (ED) threaten both. Increased demand and staff shortages intensify these issues and cause crowding. Understanding healthcare workers' perspectives on workload is essential for effective policymaking and maintaining a durable workforce. The objective of this study was to explore the current perceived workload of ED professionals, and their vision on how to influence it and to understand the healthcare worker's perspective on proposed healthcare reforms in the Netherlands.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitive study using semi-structured interviews with 33 healthcare professionals (ED physicians, physician assistants and nurses) working in a university medical center, and three general hospitals from March-July 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interview transcripts were coded. An inductive content analysis was performed, where codes were assigned to the transcripts and adjusted. Codes were then sorted into themes on causes of workload, consequences and proposed solutions for reducing the workload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Emergency department professionals identified increasing patient inflow, barriers to patient throughput and output, and staff shortages as key workload causes. Consequences included increased time, mental and psychological demands, leading to stress and reduced job satisfaction. A well-coordinated team and having social interaction with colleagues is seen as a key part of the profession by ED-professionals. Next to that, training and development opportunities contribute to job satisfaction. Proposed solutions involved public education, improved care coordination, technological innovations, and enhanced collaboration within and among hospitals to improve efficiency and job satisfaction, and to reduce perceived workload pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Addressing perceived workload is crucial for maintaining quality and accessibility of care. Dutch ED professionals face a high workload leading to stress and lower job satisfaction. To ensure successful changes, adequate preconditions and engaging healthcare professionals in decision-making are crucial. In future research, a stronger focus on effective work habits and processes, including provider satisfaction and workplace well-being, is necessary.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403633/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01334-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01334-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:充足的人员配备和可管理的工作量对于高质量的急诊护理至关重要。然而,急诊科(ED)的高感知工作量对两者都构成威胁。需求增加和员工短缺加剧了这些问题,并造成拥挤。了解卫生保健工作者对工作量的看法对于有效决策和维持一支持久的工作队伍至关重要。本研究的目的是探讨当前急诊室专业人员的工作量,以及他们对如何影响工作量的看法,并了解荷兰医护人员对拟议的医疗改革的看法。方法:采用半结构化访谈法对某大学医学中心和3家综合医院的33名医疗专业人员(急诊科医师、医师助理和护士)进行定性研究。采访被录音并逐字记录下来。采访笔录是编码的。进行归纳内容分析,将代码分配给转录本并进行调整。然后根据工作量的原因、后果和减少工作量的建议解决方案对代码进行分类。结果:急诊科专业人员确定患者流入增加,患者吞吐量和输出障碍,以及工作人员短缺是主要的工作量原因。结果包括时间、精神和心理需求增加,导致压力和工作满意度降低。一个协调良好的团队和与同事的社交互动被教育专业人士视为职业的关键部分。其次,培训和发展机会有助于提高工作满意度。提出的解决方案包括公共教育、改善护理协调、技术创新和加强医院内部和医院之间的合作,以提高效率和工作满意度,并减少感知的工作量压力。结论:解决感知工作量对维持护理质量和可及性至关重要。荷兰的ED专业人员面临着高工作量导致的压力和较低的工作满意度。为了确保成功的变革,充分的先决条件和让医疗保健专业人员参与决策至关重要。在未来的研究中,有必要更加关注有效的工作习惯和流程,包括提供者满意度和工作场所幸福感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Perceptions of workload in emergency care in the Netherlands and how to influence this: a qualitative study.

Background: Adequate staffing and manageable workloads are crucial for high-quality emergency care. However, high perceived workloads in the emergency department (ED) threaten both. Increased demand and staff shortages intensify these issues and cause crowding. Understanding healthcare workers' perspectives on workload is essential for effective policymaking and maintaining a durable workforce. The objective of this study was to explore the current perceived workload of ED professionals, and their vision on how to influence it and to understand the healthcare worker's perspective on proposed healthcare reforms in the Netherlands.

Methods: Qualitive study using semi-structured interviews with 33 healthcare professionals (ED physicians, physician assistants and nurses) working in a university medical center, and three general hospitals from March-July 2023. The interviews were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. The interview transcripts were coded. An inductive content analysis was performed, where codes were assigned to the transcripts and adjusted. Codes were then sorted into themes on causes of workload, consequences and proposed solutions for reducing the workload.

Results: Emergency department professionals identified increasing patient inflow, barriers to patient throughput and output, and staff shortages as key workload causes. Consequences included increased time, mental and psychological demands, leading to stress and reduced job satisfaction. A well-coordinated team and having social interaction with colleagues is seen as a key part of the profession by ED-professionals. Next to that, training and development opportunities contribute to job satisfaction. Proposed solutions involved public education, improved care coordination, technological innovations, and enhanced collaboration within and among hospitals to improve efficiency and job satisfaction, and to reduce perceived workload pressure.

Conclusions: Addressing perceived workload is crucial for maintaining quality and accessibility of care. Dutch ED professionals face a high workload leading to stress and lower job satisfaction. To ensure successful changes, adequate preconditions and engaging healthcare professionals in decision-making are crucial. In future research, a stronger focus on effective work habits and processes, including provider satisfaction and workplace well-being, is necessary.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信