伊朗卫生系统在应对恐怖爆炸袭击过程中面临的挑战:对现场经验的描述现象学定性研究。

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Asghar Tavan, Ahmad Mashkoori, Asiye Aminafshar, Afshin Khazaei, Sahar Salahi, Hojjat Farahmandnia
{"title":"伊朗卫生系统在应对恐怖爆炸袭击过程中面临的挑战:对现场经验的描述现象学定性研究。","authors":"Asghar Tavan, Ahmad Mashkoori, Asiye Aminafshar, Afshin Khazaei, Sahar Salahi, Hojjat Farahmandnia","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01338-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mass casualty incidents present significant challenges not only for healthcare providers and emergency service responders at the incident scene, but also for the hospitals that receive those affected. Terrorism related mass casualty incidents can lead to a diverse array of circumstances, necessitating those hospitals and their personnel be adequately prepared to manage more complex and demanding requirements. This study aimed to explore the health system challenges related to the response process to terrorist explosive bombing attacks from the perspective of Iranian health system managers and experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present qualitative study employs a descriptive phenomenology approach conducted in Iran. Data were gathered through in-depth individual interviews with 16 health managers and experts, using purposive sampling. The Data analysis was conducted utilizing Colaizzi's 7-step method. To ensure the trustworthiness of the findings, the study adhered to the recommendations set forth by Lincoln and Guba.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After multiple rounds of analyzing and summarizing the data and taking into consideration similarities and differences, 230 initial codes, 18 sub-categories, 5 categories and 2 main themes were created based on the results of data analysis. Theme 1: Intra-organizational challenges including categories of (prehospital and hospital challenges). Theme 2: Inter-organizational challenges including categories of (chain of command, insufficient security and ineffective communication and information).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explored healthcare workers and managers experiences with internal and external organizational challenges in responding to terrorist explosive bombing attacks. Findings reveal that such incidents pose unique demands distinct from other emergencies, requiring tailored preparedness strategies, especially in prehospital, hospital, and logistical sectors, despite existing general disaster plans. An effective response needs multisectoral collaboration with security forces and aid organizations. The presentation of real-world insights can inform targeted preparedness programs for high-risk, chaotic terrorist scenarios.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"175"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403913/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Challenges faced by the Iranian health system in response process to terrorist explosive attacks: a descriptive phenomenology qualitative study of live experiences.\",\"authors\":\"Asghar Tavan, Ahmad Mashkoori, Asiye Aminafshar, Afshin Khazaei, Sahar Salahi, Hojjat Farahmandnia\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12873-025-01338-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Mass casualty incidents present significant challenges not only for healthcare providers and emergency service responders at the incident scene, but also for the hospitals that receive those affected. Terrorism related mass casualty incidents can lead to a diverse array of circumstances, necessitating those hospitals and their personnel be adequately prepared to manage more complex and demanding requirements. This study aimed to explore the health system challenges related to the response process to terrorist explosive bombing attacks from the perspective of Iranian health system managers and experts.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present qualitative study employs a descriptive phenomenology approach conducted in Iran. Data were gathered through in-depth individual interviews with 16 health managers and experts, using purposive sampling. The Data analysis was conducted utilizing Colaizzi's 7-step method. To ensure the trustworthiness of the findings, the study adhered to the recommendations set forth by Lincoln and Guba.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After multiple rounds of analyzing and summarizing the data and taking into consideration similarities and differences, 230 initial codes, 18 sub-categories, 5 categories and 2 main themes were created based on the results of data analysis. Theme 1: Intra-organizational challenges including categories of (prehospital and hospital challenges). Theme 2: Inter-organizational challenges including categories of (chain of command, insufficient security and ineffective communication and information).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study explored healthcare workers and managers experiences with internal and external organizational challenges in responding to terrorist explosive bombing attacks. Findings reveal that such incidents pose unique demands distinct from other emergencies, requiring tailored preparedness strategies, especially in prehospital, hospital, and logistical sectors, despite existing general disaster plans. An effective response needs multisectoral collaboration with security forces and aid organizations. The presentation of real-world insights can inform targeted preparedness programs for high-risk, chaotic terrorist scenarios.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"175\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12403913/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01338-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01338-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大规模伤亡事件不仅对事故现场的医疗保健提供者和应急服务响应者提出了重大挑战,而且对接收伤者的医院也提出了重大挑战。与恐怖主义有关的大规模伤亡事件可能导致各种各样的情况,这些医院及其工作人员必须做好充分准备,以应对更复杂和更苛刻的要求。本研究旨在从伊朗卫生系统管理人员和专家的角度探讨与恐怖爆炸袭击反应过程相关的卫生系统挑战。方法:本定性研究采用描述现象学方法在伊朗进行。通过对16名卫生管理人员和专家进行深入的个人访谈,采用有目的的抽样方法收集数据。数据分析采用Colaizzi的7步法。为了确保研究结果的可信度,这项研究遵循了林肯和古巴提出的建议。结果:经过多轮数据分析总结,综合异同,根据数据分析结果,共创建230个初始码、18个小类、5个大类、2个主旋律。主题1:组织内部挑战,包括(院前挑战和医院挑战)类别。主题2:组织间挑战,包括(指挥链、安全不足、沟通和信息无效)的类别。结论:本研究探讨了卫生保健工作者和管理人员在应对恐怖爆炸袭击时面临的内部和外部组织挑战。调查结果显示,尽管现有一般灾害计划,但此类事件提出了与其他紧急情况不同的独特需求,需要有针对性的备灾战略,特别是在院前、医院和后勤部门。有效的反应需要与安全部队和援助组织进行多部门合作。真实世界的洞察可以为高风险、混乱的恐怖主义场景提供有针对性的准备计划。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Challenges faced by the Iranian health system in response process to terrorist explosive attacks: a descriptive phenomenology qualitative study of live experiences.

Introduction: Mass casualty incidents present significant challenges not only for healthcare providers and emergency service responders at the incident scene, but also for the hospitals that receive those affected. Terrorism related mass casualty incidents can lead to a diverse array of circumstances, necessitating those hospitals and their personnel be adequately prepared to manage more complex and demanding requirements. This study aimed to explore the health system challenges related to the response process to terrorist explosive bombing attacks from the perspective of Iranian health system managers and experts.

Methods: The present qualitative study employs a descriptive phenomenology approach conducted in Iran. Data were gathered through in-depth individual interviews with 16 health managers and experts, using purposive sampling. The Data analysis was conducted utilizing Colaizzi's 7-step method. To ensure the trustworthiness of the findings, the study adhered to the recommendations set forth by Lincoln and Guba.

Results: After multiple rounds of analyzing and summarizing the data and taking into consideration similarities and differences, 230 initial codes, 18 sub-categories, 5 categories and 2 main themes were created based on the results of data analysis. Theme 1: Intra-organizational challenges including categories of (prehospital and hospital challenges). Theme 2: Inter-organizational challenges including categories of (chain of command, insufficient security and ineffective communication and information).

Conclusion: This study explored healthcare workers and managers experiences with internal and external organizational challenges in responding to terrorist explosive bombing attacks. Findings reveal that such incidents pose unique demands distinct from other emergencies, requiring tailored preparedness strategies, especially in prehospital, hospital, and logistical sectors, despite existing general disaster plans. An effective response needs multisectoral collaboration with security forces and aid organizations. The presentation of real-world insights can inform targeted preparedness programs for high-risk, chaotic terrorist scenarios.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信