颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术未覆盖的椎间孔残留狭窄是否会加重颈椎神经根病的术后预后?

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Sehan Park, Dong-Ho Lee, San Kim, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除术和融合术未覆盖的椎间孔残留狭窄是否会加重颈椎神经根病的术后预后?","authors":"Sehan Park, Dong-Ho Lee, San Kim, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether untreated foraminal stenosis (FS) at levels not included in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) impacts postoperative outcomes in patients with cervical radiculopathy and assess if residual FS increases the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Level selection for ACDF for cervical radiculopathy is complex, considering variable patient anatomy and symptoms. It is unclear whether treating only potentially symptomatic levels could provide equivalent results to managing all pathologic levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 188 patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical radiculopathy between 2014 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those with all symptomatic levels decompressed (No-FS group, n=162) and those with untreated FS at levels not targeted in surgery (FS group, n=26). Postoperative outcomes, including neck pain, arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI), were evaluated at 3 months and 2 years. Radiographic parameters and ASD incidence were also compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in neck pain, arm pain, and NDI postoperatively, with no significant intergroup differences at 3 months and 2 years. C2-C7 lordosis and sagittal vertical axis showed similar improvement in both groups postoperatively. Rates of ASD and revision surgery did not differ significantly between No-FS and FS groups (5.6% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p=0.652). Logistic regression revealed no significant predictors of NDI improvement >50% among preoperative demographic or radiographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Untreated FS at levels outside the surgical target area did not adversely affect ACDF outcomes or increase ASD risk over a 2-year follow-up. These findings suggest that ACDF can be safely limited to levels directly associated with patient symptoms without compromising clinical outcomes, potentially reducing the surgical extent and associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does residual foraminal stenosis at levels not covered by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion aggravate postoperative outcomes in cervical radiculopathy?\",\"authors\":\"Sehan Park, Dong-Ho Lee, San Kim, Chang Ju Hwang, Jae Hwan Cho\",\"doi\":\"10.31616/asj.2024.0501\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate whether untreated foraminal stenosis (FS) at levels not included in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) impacts postoperative outcomes in patients with cervical radiculopathy and assess if residual FS increases the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Level selection for ACDF for cervical radiculopathy is complex, considering variable patient anatomy and symptoms. It is unclear whether treating only potentially symptomatic levels could provide equivalent results to managing all pathologic levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a retrospective cohort study of 188 patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical radiculopathy between 2014 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those with all symptomatic levels decompressed (No-FS group, n=162) and those with untreated FS at levels not targeted in surgery (FS group, n=26). Postoperative outcomes, including neck pain, arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI), were evaluated at 3 months and 2 years. Radiographic parameters and ASD incidence were also compared between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both groups showed significant improvement in neck pain, arm pain, and NDI postoperatively, with no significant intergroup differences at 3 months and 2 years. C2-C7 lordosis and sagittal vertical axis showed similar improvement in both groups postoperatively. Rates of ASD and revision surgery did not differ significantly between No-FS and FS groups (5.6% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p=0.652). Logistic regression revealed no significant predictors of NDI improvement >50% among preoperative demographic or radiographic factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Untreated FS at levels outside the surgical target area did not adversely affect ACDF outcomes or increase ASD risk over a 2-year follow-up. These findings suggest that ACDF can be safely limited to levels directly associated with patient symptoms without compromising clinical outcomes, potentially reducing the surgical extent and associated risks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8555,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0501\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性队列研究。目的:评估未经治疗的椎间孔狭窄(FS)是否会影响颈椎神经根病患者的术后预后,并评估残留的FS是否会增加邻近节段疾病(ASD)的风险。文献综述:考虑到不同的患者解剖结构和症状,ACDF治疗颈椎神经根病的水平选择是复杂的。目前尚不清楚仅治疗潜在症状水平是否能提供与控制所有病理水平相同的结果。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2014年至2020年间188例行ACDF治疗退行性颈椎神经根病的患者。将患者分为两组:所有症状水平均减压的患者(No-FS组,n=162)和未治疗且未达到手术目标水平的FS患者(FS组,n=26)。术后结果,包括3个月和2年的颈部疼痛、手臂疼痛和颈部残疾指数(NDI)。比较两组间影像学参数及ASD发生率。结果:两组术后颈痛、臂痛和NDI均有明显改善,3个月和2年组间差异无统计学意义。两组术后C2-C7前凸和矢状垂直轴改善相似。No-FS组和FS组ASD和翻修手术发生率无显著差异(分别为5.6%和7.7%;p=0.652)。Logistic回归显示术前人口统计学或影像学因素对NDI改善无显著影响。结论:在2年的随访中,手术靶区以外未治疗的FS对ACDF结果没有不利影响,也没有增加ASD风险。这些研究结果表明,ACDF可以安全地限制在与患者症状直接相关的水平,而不会影响临床结果,潜在地减少手术范围和相关风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does residual foraminal stenosis at levels not covered by anterior cervical discectomy and fusion aggravate postoperative outcomes in cervical radiculopathy?

Study design: Retrospective cohort study.

Purpose: To evaluate whether untreated foraminal stenosis (FS) at levels not included in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) impacts postoperative outcomes in patients with cervical radiculopathy and assess if residual FS increases the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD).

Overview of literature: Level selection for ACDF for cervical radiculopathy is complex, considering variable patient anatomy and symptoms. It is unclear whether treating only potentially symptomatic levels could provide equivalent results to managing all pathologic levels.

Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study of 188 patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative cervical radiculopathy between 2014 and 2020. Patients were divided into two groups: those with all symptomatic levels decompressed (No-FS group, n=162) and those with untreated FS at levels not targeted in surgery (FS group, n=26). Postoperative outcomes, including neck pain, arm pain, and Neck Disability Index (NDI), were evaluated at 3 months and 2 years. Radiographic parameters and ASD incidence were also compared between groups.

Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in neck pain, arm pain, and NDI postoperatively, with no significant intergroup differences at 3 months and 2 years. C2-C7 lordosis and sagittal vertical axis showed similar improvement in both groups postoperatively. Rates of ASD and revision surgery did not differ significantly between No-FS and FS groups (5.6% vs. 7.7%, respectively; p=0.652). Logistic regression revealed no significant predictors of NDI improvement >50% among preoperative demographic or radiographic factors.

Conclusions: Untreated FS at levels outside the surgical target area did not adversely affect ACDF outcomes or increase ASD risk over a 2-year follow-up. These findings suggest that ACDF can be safely limited to levels directly associated with patient symptoms without compromising clinical outcomes, potentially reducing the surgical extent and associated risks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信