大麻二酚与安慰剂在纤维肌痛患者中的作用:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、单中心试验。

IF 20.6 1区 医学 Q1 RHEUMATOLOGY
Marianne Uggen Rasmussen, Robin Christensen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Marius Henriksen, Pernille Hurup Duhn, Henning Bliddal, Kirstine Amris
{"title":"大麻二酚与安慰剂在纤维肌痛患者中的作用:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、平行组、单中心试验。","authors":"Marianne Uggen Rasmussen, Robin Christensen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Marius Henriksen, Pernille Hurup Duhn, Henning Bliddal, Kirstine Amris","doi":"10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cannabidiol (CBD) is used to alleviate fibromyalgia pain despite limited evidence for efficacy. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CBD vs placebo in patients with fibromyalgia, hypothesising that CBD would be superior to placebo in reducing pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia were recruited from a specialised outpatient clinic in Denmark. Eligible participants were randomised 1:1 and stratified by sex, defined as biological sex assigned at birth based on physical anatomy. Age (<45 vs ≥45), and pain level (<7 vs ≥7) on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) to receive 50 mg plant-derived CBD or placebo tablets. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity at week 24, assessed on the NRS pain subitem in the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study in the safety population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 273 participants screened for eligibility, 200 were included and randomised to receive CBD (n = 100) or placebo (n = 100). At week 24, mean change in pain intensity was -0.4 points (95% CI: -0.82 to 0.08) in the CBD group and -1.1 points (95% CI: -1.53 to -0.63) in the placebo group, corresponding to a between-group difference of -0.7 points (95% CI: -1.2 to -0.25; P = .0028) favouring placebo. Adverse events were generally mild and evenly distributed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings do not support CBD 50 mg daily as an analgesic supplement for patients with fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov number: NCT04729179.</p>","PeriodicalId":8087,"journal":{"name":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":20.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cannabidiol versus placebo in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre trial.\",\"authors\":\"Marianne Uggen Rasmussen, Robin Christensen, Eva Ejlersen Wæhrens, Marius Henriksen, Pernille Hurup Duhn, Henning Bliddal, Kirstine Amris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Cannabidiol (CBD) is used to alleviate fibromyalgia pain despite limited evidence for efficacy. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CBD vs placebo in patients with fibromyalgia, hypothesising that CBD would be superior to placebo in reducing pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia were recruited from a specialised outpatient clinic in Denmark. Eligible participants were randomised 1:1 and stratified by sex, defined as biological sex assigned at birth based on physical anatomy. Age (<45 vs ≥45), and pain level (<7 vs ≥7) on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) to receive 50 mg plant-derived CBD or placebo tablets. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity at week 24, assessed on the NRS pain subitem in the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study in the safety population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 273 participants screened for eligibility, 200 were included and randomised to receive CBD (n = 100) or placebo (n = 100). At week 24, mean change in pain intensity was -0.4 points (95% CI: -0.82 to 0.08) in the CBD group and -1.1 points (95% CI: -1.53 to -0.63) in the placebo group, corresponding to a between-group difference of -0.7 points (95% CI: -1.2 to -0.25; P = .0028) favouring placebo. Adverse events were generally mild and evenly distributed between groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings do not support CBD 50 mg daily as an analgesic supplement for patients with fibromyalgia.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials: </strong>gov number: NCT04729179.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8087,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":20.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ard.2025.07.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大麻二酚(CBD)用于减轻纤维肌痛痛,尽管有限的证据有效性。本研究评估了CBD与安慰剂在纤维肌痛患者中的疗效和安全性,假设CBD在减轻疼痛方面优于安慰剂。方法:在这项单中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验中,诊断为纤维肌痛的患者从丹麦的一家专门门诊诊所招募。符合条件的参与者按1:1随机分组,按性别分层,定义为出生时根据生理解剖分配的生理性别。年龄(结果:在273名筛选合格的参与者中,包括200名参与者,并随机分配接受CBD (n = 100)或安慰剂(n = 100)。在第24周,CBD组的疼痛强度平均变化为-0.4点(95% CI: -0.82至0.08),安慰剂组的疼痛强度平均变化为-1.1点(95% CI: -1.53至-0.63),对应于安慰剂组的组间差异为-0.7点(95% CI: -1.2至-0.25;P = 0.0028)。不良事件一般较轻,组间分布均匀。结论:研究结果不支持每天50mg CBD作为纤维肌痛患者的镇痛补充剂。Clinicaltrials: gov编号:NCT04729179。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cannabidiol versus placebo in patients with fibromyalgia: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, single-centre trial.

Objectives: Cannabidiol (CBD) is used to alleviate fibromyalgia pain despite limited evidence for efficacy. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of CBD vs placebo in patients with fibromyalgia, hypothesising that CBD would be superior to placebo in reducing pain.

Methods: In this single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, patients diagnosed with fibromyalgia were recruited from a specialised outpatient clinic in Denmark. Eligible participants were randomised 1:1 and stratified by sex, defined as biological sex assigned at birth based on physical anatomy. Age (<45 vs ≥45), and pain level (<7 vs ≥7) on a 0 to 10 numeric rating scale (NRS) to receive 50 mg plant-derived CBD or placebo tablets. The primary outcome was change in pain intensity at week 24, assessed on the NRS pain subitem in the revised Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire in the intention-to-treat population. Adverse events were monitored throughout the study in the safety population.

Results: Of 273 participants screened for eligibility, 200 were included and randomised to receive CBD (n = 100) or placebo (n = 100). At week 24, mean change in pain intensity was -0.4 points (95% CI: -0.82 to 0.08) in the CBD group and -1.1 points (95% CI: -1.53 to -0.63) in the placebo group, corresponding to a between-group difference of -0.7 points (95% CI: -1.2 to -0.25; P = .0028) favouring placebo. Adverse events were generally mild and evenly distributed between groups.

Conclusions: The findings do not support CBD 50 mg daily as an analgesic supplement for patients with fibromyalgia.

Clinicaltrials: gov number: NCT04729179.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
35.00
自引率
9.90%
发文量
3728
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases (ARD) is an international peer-reviewed journal covering all aspects of rheumatology, which includes the full spectrum of musculoskeletal conditions, arthritic disease, and connective tissue disorders. ARD publishes basic, clinical, and translational scientific research, including the most important recommendations for the management of various conditions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信