Thuy-My Nguyen, Luke Traeger, Tracy Fitzsimmons, Michelle Thomas, Tarik Sammour
{"title":"直肠癌全新辅助治疗后器官保留患者的功能结局和生活质量——一项历史队列研究。","authors":"Thuy-My Nguyen, Luke Traeger, Tracy Fitzsimmons, Michelle Thomas, Tarik Sammour","doi":"10.1111/ans.70309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer improves oncological outcomes and organ preservation rates, but the impact on patient quality of life (QoL) is not known. This cohort study compares the quality of life (QoL) of post-TNT watch-and-wait (W&W) patients to a historical cohort of patients that underwent standard care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients managed with a W&W approach following a personalised TNT (pTNT W&W group) were compared with historical group patients who had undergone standard treatment but who would have been eligible for pTNT under our current protocol (STD group). Patients were sent three questionnaires to complete: Survey of International Delphi consensus definition for lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms, EORTC-QLQ-CR29, and the LARS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were completed for 29 of 41 patients in the pTNT W&W group, and 33 of 63 patients in the STD group (a response rate of 70.7% and 52.4%, respectively). Patients were well matched at baseline. The pTNT W&W group had significantly lower LARS rates (55.6% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.012) with fewer cases of major LARS (29.6% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.039). The pTNT W&W also had significantly improved QoL scores across several parameters of EORTC-QLQ-CR29 including stool frequency (20.7 vs. 30.8, p = 0.009), embarrassment regarding bowel symptoms (16.1 vs. 31.3, p = 0.018), and abdominal pain (5.8 vs. 14.1, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite retaining the irradiated rectum, patients managed with organ preservation after TNT experience a higher QoL with much lower, but not absent, rates of bowel and bladder dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients Managed With Organ Preservation Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer-A Historical Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Thuy-My Nguyen, Luke Traeger, Tracy Fitzsimmons, Michelle Thomas, Tarik Sammour\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ans.70309\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer improves oncological outcomes and organ preservation rates, but the impact on patient quality of life (QoL) is not known. This cohort study compares the quality of life (QoL) of post-TNT watch-and-wait (W&W) patients to a historical cohort of patients that underwent standard care.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Patients managed with a W&W approach following a personalised TNT (pTNT W&W group) were compared with historical group patients who had undergone standard treatment but who would have been eligible for pTNT under our current protocol (STD group). Patients were sent three questionnaires to complete: Survey of International Delphi consensus definition for lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms, EORTC-QLQ-CR29, and the LARS score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Questionnaires were completed for 29 of 41 patients in the pTNT W&W group, and 33 of 63 patients in the STD group (a response rate of 70.7% and 52.4%, respectively). Patients were well matched at baseline. The pTNT W&W group had significantly lower LARS rates (55.6% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.012) with fewer cases of major LARS (29.6% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.039). The pTNT W&W also had significantly improved QoL scores across several parameters of EORTC-QLQ-CR29 including stool frequency (20.7 vs. 30.8, p = 0.009), embarrassment regarding bowel symptoms (16.1 vs. 31.3, p = 0.018), and abdominal pain (5.8 vs. 14.1, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite retaining the irradiated rectum, patients managed with organ preservation after TNT experience a higher QoL with much lower, but not absent, rates of bowel and bladder dysfunction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ANZ Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70309\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70309","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:局部晚期直肠癌的全新辅助治疗(TNT)可改善肿瘤预后和器官保存率,但对患者生活质量(QoL)的影响尚不清楚。本队列研究比较了tnt后观察等待(W&W)患者与接受标准治疗的历史队列患者的生活质量(QoL)。方法:将个体化TNT治疗后采用W&W方法的患者(pTNT W&W组)与接受标准治疗但符合我们现行方案pTNT治疗条件的历史组患者(STD组)进行比较。向患者发放3份问卷,分别填写国际德尔菲共识定义下前切除术综合征(LARS)症状调查、EORTC-QLQ-CR29、LARS评分。结果:pTNT W&W组41例患者中有29例完成了问卷调查,STD组63例患者中有33例完成了问卷调查(有效率分别为70.7%和52.4%)。患者在基线时匹配良好。pTNT W&W组LARS发生率显著降低(55.6% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.012),重度LARS发生率较低(29.6% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.039)。pTNT W&W在EORTC-QLQ-CR29的几个参数上也有显著改善的生活质量评分,包括大便频率(20.7比30.8,p = 0.009)、肠道症状尴尬(16.1比31.3,p = 0.018)和腹痛(5.8比14.1,p = 0.005)。结论:尽管保留了放射后的直肠,但在TNT后进行器官保存的患者的生活质量更高,而肠道和膀胱功能障碍的发生率要低得多,但并非没有。
Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life in Patients Managed With Organ Preservation Following Total Neoadjuvant Therapy for Rectal Cancer-A Historical Cohort Study.
Aim: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for locally advanced rectal cancer improves oncological outcomes and organ preservation rates, but the impact on patient quality of life (QoL) is not known. This cohort study compares the quality of life (QoL) of post-TNT watch-and-wait (W&W) patients to a historical cohort of patients that underwent standard care.
Method: Patients managed with a W&W approach following a personalised TNT (pTNT W&W group) were compared with historical group patients who had undergone standard treatment but who would have been eligible for pTNT under our current protocol (STD group). Patients were sent three questionnaires to complete: Survey of International Delphi consensus definition for lower anterior resection syndrome (LARS) symptoms, EORTC-QLQ-CR29, and the LARS score.
Results: Questionnaires were completed for 29 of 41 patients in the pTNT W&W group, and 33 of 63 patients in the STD group (a response rate of 70.7% and 52.4%, respectively). Patients were well matched at baseline. The pTNT W&W group had significantly lower LARS rates (55.6% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.012) with fewer cases of major LARS (29.6% vs. 58.3%, p = 0.039). The pTNT W&W also had significantly improved QoL scores across several parameters of EORTC-QLQ-CR29 including stool frequency (20.7 vs. 30.8, p = 0.009), embarrassment regarding bowel symptoms (16.1 vs. 31.3, p = 0.018), and abdominal pain (5.8 vs. 14.1, p = 0.005).
Conclusions: Despite retaining the irradiated rectum, patients managed with organ preservation after TNT experience a higher QoL with much lower, but not absent, rates of bowel and bladder dysfunction.
期刊介绍:
ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.