新辅助治疗对直肠癌肠系膜ct值及肿瘤消退的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 ONCOLOGY
Hiroaki Nozawa, S O Kasuga, Koji Murono, Kazuhito Sasaki, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Soichiro Ishihara
{"title":"新辅助治疗对直肠癌肠系膜ct值及肿瘤消退的影响。","authors":"Hiroaki Nozawa, S O Kasuga, Koji Murono, Kazuhito Sasaki, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Soichiro Ishihara","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for lower rectal cancer is primarily determined by its effects on the primary tumor. We recently reported an association between the change in mesorectal CT values (ΔCTVs) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and histological tumor regression grade (TRG). However, the influence of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (ST) on the mesorectum remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the association between ΔCTV before and after neoadjuvant therapy including systemic therapy (ST) and other preoperative, surgical and pathological factors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent CRT (93 cases) or ST (16 cases) before surgery were examined. Clinicopathological factors, including ΔCTV at predetermined points within the mesorectum were compared between the two neoadjuvant treatments. Multivariate analysis was also conducted to identify factors associated with good TRG (TRG 2/3) based on the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔCTV was higher with CRT than with ST (median: +8.7 <i>vs.</i> -6.0 Hounsfield Units; <i>p</i>=0.002). However, operative time (<i>p</i>=0.003) and blood loss (<i>p</i>=0.03) during rectal surgery were higher with ST than with CRT. Multivariate analysis identified CRT and ΔCTV >6.5 Hounsfield Units as independent predictors of good TRG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CRT and high ΔCTV were associated with good TRG in rectal cancer. CRT generally increased ΔCTV, suggesting the induction of mesorectal edema. Despite this unfavorable condition for dissecting the surgical plane, short-term surgical outcomes were better with CRT than with ST owing to greater tumor shrinkage.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 9","pages":"3921-3930"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Neoadjuvant Treatments on Mesorectal Computed Tomography Values and Tumor Regression in Rectal Cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Hiroaki Nozawa, S O Kasuga, Koji Murono, Kazuhito Sasaki, Shigenobu Emoto, Yuichiro Yokoyama, Soichiro Ishihara\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17750\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/aim: </strong>The efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for lower rectal cancer is primarily determined by its effects on the primary tumor. We recently reported an association between the change in mesorectal CT values (ΔCTVs) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and histological tumor regression grade (TRG). However, the influence of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (ST) on the mesorectum remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the association between ΔCTV before and after neoadjuvant therapy including systemic therapy (ST) and other preoperative, surgical and pathological factors.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent CRT (93 cases) or ST (16 cases) before surgery were examined. Clinicopathological factors, including ΔCTV at predetermined points within the mesorectum were compared between the two neoadjuvant treatments. Multivariate analysis was also conducted to identify factors associated with good TRG (TRG 2/3) based on the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ΔCTV was higher with CRT than with ST (median: +8.7 <i>vs.</i> -6.0 Hounsfield Units; <i>p</i>=0.002). However, operative time (<i>p</i>=0.003) and blood loss (<i>p</i>=0.03) during rectal surgery were higher with ST than with CRT. Multivariate analysis identified CRT and ΔCTV >6.5 Hounsfield Units as independent predictors of good TRG.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both CRT and high ΔCTV were associated with good TRG in rectal cancer. CRT generally increased ΔCTV, suggesting the induction of mesorectal edema. Despite this unfavorable condition for dissecting the surgical plane, short-term surgical outcomes were better with CRT than with ST owing to greater tumor shrinkage.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":\"45 9\",\"pages\":\"3921-3930\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17750\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:下直肠癌术前放化疗(CRT)的疗效主要取决于其对原发肿瘤的影响。我们最近报道了放化疗(CRT)期间直肠系膜CT值的变化(ΔCTVs)与组织学肿瘤消退等级(TRG)之间的关系。然而,新辅助全身治疗(ST)对肠系膜的影响尚不清楚。本研究旨在确定ΔCTV在包括全身治疗(ST)在内的新辅助治疗前后与其他术前、手术和病理因素的关系。患者与方法:对术前行CRT(93例)或ST(16例)的下段直肠癌患者进行检查。比较两种新辅助治疗的临床病理因素,包括在肠系膜内预定点的ΔCTV。并根据日本结直肠癌分类进行多因素分析,以确定与良好TRG (TRG 2/3)相关的因素。结果:CRT组ΔCTV高于ST组(中位数:+8.7 vs -6.0 Hounsfield单位;p=0.002)。然而,直肠手术中ST组的手术时间(p=0.003)和出血量(p=0.03)高于CRT组。多变量分析发现CRT和ΔCTV >6.5 Hounsfield单位是良好TRG的独立预测因子。结论:直肠癌患者的CRT和高ΔCTV均与良好的TRG相关。CRT普遍升高ΔCTV,提示诱发直肠系膜水肿。尽管这对解剖手术平面不利,但由于肿瘤缩小更大,CRT的短期手术效果优于ST。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Neoadjuvant Treatments on Mesorectal Computed Tomography Values and Tumor Regression in Rectal Cancer.

Background/aim: The efficacy of preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for lower rectal cancer is primarily determined by its effects on the primary tumor. We recently reported an association between the change in mesorectal CT values (ΔCTVs) during chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and histological tumor regression grade (TRG). However, the influence of neoadjuvant systemic therapy (ST) on the mesorectum remains unknown. This study aimed to determine the association between ΔCTV before and after neoadjuvant therapy including systemic therapy (ST) and other preoperative, surgical and pathological factors.

Patients and methods: Patients with lower rectal cancer who underwent CRT (93 cases) or ST (16 cases) before surgery were examined. Clinicopathological factors, including ΔCTV at predetermined points within the mesorectum were compared between the two neoadjuvant treatments. Multivariate analysis was also conducted to identify factors associated with good TRG (TRG 2/3) based on the Japanese Classification of Colorectal Carcinoma.

Results: ΔCTV was higher with CRT than with ST (median: +8.7 vs. -6.0 Hounsfield Units; p=0.002). However, operative time (p=0.003) and blood loss (p=0.03) during rectal surgery were higher with ST than with CRT. Multivariate analysis identified CRT and ΔCTV >6.5 Hounsfield Units as independent predictors of good TRG.

Conclusion: Both CRT and high ΔCTV were associated with good TRG in rectal cancer. CRT generally increased ΔCTV, suggesting the induction of mesorectal edema. Despite this unfavorable condition for dissecting the surgical plane, short-term surgical outcomes were better with CRT than with ST owing to greater tumor shrinkage.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anticancer research
Anticancer research 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.00%
发文量
566
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed. ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies). Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信