初期局部治疗策略对早期乳腺粘膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤生存结局的影响。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Hong-Yu Chen, San-Gang Wu, Zhen-Yu He
{"title":"初期局部治疗策略对早期乳腺粘膜相关淋巴组织淋巴瘤生存结局的影响。","authors":"Hong-Yu Chen, San-Gang Wu, Zhen-Yu He","doi":"10.1007/s00277-025-06520-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To compare survival outcomes among different initial treatment strategies for early-stage (stage I-II) breast mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we analyzed patients diagnosed with early-stage breast MALT lymphoma between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. Among 396 eligible patients, treatment strategies included surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy (161 patients, 40.7%), radiotherapy alone (122 patients, 30.8%), and observation (113 patients, 28.5%). Temporal trends indicated increasing use of radiotherapy alone, while surgery alone and observation declined (P = 0.061). With a median follow-up of 94 months, the 8-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.7% and 71.9%, respectively. Patients receiving local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy) alone demonstrated superior CSS (P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001) compared to observation. However, adding chemotherapy to local treatment was associated with worse CSS (P = 0.017) and OS (P = 0.003). Sensitivity analysis revealed no significant differences in CSS or OS among local treatment modalities (surgery alone, radiotherapy alone, or combined surgery and radiotherapy). Radiotherapy alone can achieve the optimal disease control for early-stage breast MALT lymphoma. The role of surgery is rather limited and is mainly considered when there is a diagnostic dilemma.</p>","PeriodicalId":8068,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Initial local treatment strategies on survival outcomes of early-stage breast mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.\",\"authors\":\"Hong-Yu Chen, San-Gang Wu, Zhen-Yu He\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00277-025-06520-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To compare survival outcomes among different initial treatment strategies for early-stage (stage I-II) breast mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we analyzed patients diagnosed with early-stage breast MALT lymphoma between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. Among 396 eligible patients, treatment strategies included surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy (161 patients, 40.7%), radiotherapy alone (122 patients, 30.8%), and observation (113 patients, 28.5%). Temporal trends indicated increasing use of radiotherapy alone, while surgery alone and observation declined (P = 0.061). With a median follow-up of 94 months, the 8-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.7% and 71.9%, respectively. Patients receiving local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy) alone demonstrated superior CSS (P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001) compared to observation. However, adding chemotherapy to local treatment was associated with worse CSS (P = 0.017) and OS (P = 0.003). Sensitivity analysis revealed no significant differences in CSS or OS among local treatment modalities (surgery alone, radiotherapy alone, or combined surgery and radiotherapy). Radiotherapy alone can achieve the optimal disease control for early-stage breast MALT lymphoma. The role of surgery is rather limited and is mainly considered when there is a diagnostic dilemma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8068,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Hematology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06520-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-025-06520-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较早期(I-II期)乳腺粘膜相关淋巴组织(MALT)淋巴瘤不同初始治疗策略的生存结局。利用监测、流行病学和最终结果项目的数据,我们分析了2000年至2017年间被诊断为早期乳腺MALT淋巴瘤的患者。统计分析包括卡方检验、Kaplan-Meier生存估计和多变量Cox比例风险模型。在396例符合条件的患者中,治疗策略包括手术加或不加术后放疗(161例,40.7%)、单纯放疗(122例,30.8%)和观察(113例,28.5%)。时间趋势显示单独放疗的使用增加,而单独手术和观察的使用减少(P = 0.061)。中位随访94个月,8年癌症特异性生存率(CSS)和总生存率(OS)分别为88.7%和71.9%。单独接受局部治疗(手术和/或放疗)的患者表现出优越的CSS (P = 0.002)和OS (P = 0.002)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Initial local treatment strategies on survival outcomes of early-stage breast mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma.

To compare survival outcomes among different initial treatment strategies for early-stage (stage I-II) breast mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (MALT) lymphoma. Using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, we analyzed patients diagnosed with early-stage breast MALT lymphoma between 2000 and 2017. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and multivariate Cox proportional-hazards models. Among 396 eligible patients, treatment strategies included surgery with or without postoperative radiotherapy (161 patients, 40.7%), radiotherapy alone (122 patients, 30.8%), and observation (113 patients, 28.5%). Temporal trends indicated increasing use of radiotherapy alone, while surgery alone and observation declined (P = 0.061). With a median follow-up of 94 months, the 8-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 88.7% and 71.9%, respectively. Patients receiving local treatment (surgery and/or radiotherapy) alone demonstrated superior CSS (P = 0.002) and OS (P < 0.001) compared to observation. However, adding chemotherapy to local treatment was associated with worse CSS (P = 0.017) and OS (P = 0.003). Sensitivity analysis revealed no significant differences in CSS or OS among local treatment modalities (surgery alone, radiotherapy alone, or combined surgery and radiotherapy). Radiotherapy alone can achieve the optimal disease control for early-stage breast MALT lymphoma. The role of surgery is rather limited and is mainly considered when there is a diagnostic dilemma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Hematology
Annals of Hematology 医学-血液学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
304
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annals of Hematology covers the whole spectrum of clinical and experimental hematology, hemostaseology, blood transfusion, and related aspects of medical oncology, including diagnosis and treatment of leukemias, lymphatic neoplasias and solid tumors, and transplantation of hematopoietic stem cells. Coverage includes general aspects of oncology, molecular biology and immunology as pertinent to problems of human blood disease. The journal is associated with the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology, and the Austrian Society for Hematology and Oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信