Takafumi Fukui, Suya Hori, Yukihisa Hatakeyama, Tatsunori Kiriu, Kanoko Matsumura, Nanako Miwa, Masahiro Katsurada, Keiko Okuno, Sho Yoshimura, Motoko Tachihara
{"title":"PD-L1 TPS分层在PD-L1低表达的晚期NSCLC中优化免疫治疗","authors":"Takafumi Fukui, Suya Hori, Yukihisa Hatakeyama, Tatsunori Kiriu, Kanoko Matsumura, Nanako Miwa, Masahiro Katsurada, Keiko Okuno, Sho Yoshimura, Motoko Tachihara","doi":"10.21873/anticanres.17745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49% remains unknown. Further stratification by PD-L1 TPS may lead to optimization of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to compare nivolumab and ipilimumab with/without chemotherapy (dual-therapy group) and chemotherapy with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (single-therapy group) as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the propensity score-matched population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 patients were enrolled; 113 in the single- (81.3%) and 26 in the dual- (18.7%) therapy groups. In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%, after propensity score-matching was performed, the median overall survival was 12.0 months for the single-therapy group, but was not reached for the dual-therapy group (<i>p</i>=0.022). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.02). In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 21-49%, after propensity score-matching, the median overall survival was not reached for the single-therapy group, but was 9.0 months for the dual-therapy group (<i>p</i>=0.04), whilst corresponding median progression-free survival was 8.3 and 4.1 months (<i>p</i>=0.087).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that in patients with NSCLC, the optimal treatment regimen may differ between those with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20% and 21-49%; moreover, nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy may be more effective than chemotherapy with a single-agent ICI for treating advanced NSCLC with ultra-low PD-L1 expression, particularly in those with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%.</p>","PeriodicalId":8072,"journal":{"name":"Anticancer research","volume":"45 9","pages":"3859-3875"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Stratification by PD-L1 TPS in Advanced NSCLC With Low PD-L1 Expression for Optimizing Immunotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Takafumi Fukui, Suya Hori, Yukihisa Hatakeyama, Tatsunori Kiriu, Kanoko Matsumura, Nanako Miwa, Masahiro Katsurada, Keiko Okuno, Sho Yoshimura, Motoko Tachihara\",\"doi\":\"10.21873/anticanres.17745\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The optimal treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49% remains unknown. Further stratification by PD-L1 TPS may lead to optimization of treatment.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to compare nivolumab and ipilimumab with/without chemotherapy (dual-therapy group) and chemotherapy with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (single-therapy group) as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the propensity score-matched population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 139 patients were enrolled; 113 in the single- (81.3%) and 26 in the dual- (18.7%) therapy groups. In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%, after propensity score-matching was performed, the median overall survival was 12.0 months for the single-therapy group, but was not reached for the dual-therapy group (<i>p</i>=0.022). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively (<i>p</i>=0.02). In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 21-49%, after propensity score-matching, the median overall survival was not reached for the single-therapy group, but was 9.0 months for the dual-therapy group (<i>p</i>=0.04), whilst corresponding median progression-free survival was 8.3 and 4.1 months (<i>p</i>=0.087).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results of this study suggest that in patients with NSCLC, the optimal treatment regimen may differ between those with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20% and 21-49%; moreover, nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy may be more effective than chemotherapy with a single-agent ICI for treating advanced NSCLC with ultra-low PD-L1 expression, particularly in those with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anticancer research\",\"volume\":\"45 9\",\"pages\":\"3859-3875\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anticancer research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17745\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anticancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21873/anticanres.17745","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Stratification by PD-L1 TPS in Advanced NSCLC With Low PD-L1 Expression for Optimizing Immunotherapy.
Background: The optimal treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with a programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) tumor proportion score (TPS) of 1-49% remains unknown. Further stratification by PD-L1 TPS may lead to optimization of treatment.
Patients and methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective, observational study to compare nivolumab and ipilimumab with/without chemotherapy (dual-therapy group) and chemotherapy with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) (single-therapy group) as the first-line therapy for advanced NSCLC with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-49%. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the propensity score-matched population.
Results: A total of 139 patients were enrolled; 113 in the single- (81.3%) and 26 in the dual- (18.7%) therapy groups. In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%, after propensity score-matching was performed, the median overall survival was 12.0 months for the single-therapy group, but was not reached for the dual-therapy group (p=0.022). The median progression-free survival was 6.9 and 11.5 months, respectively (p=0.02). In the population with PD-L1 TPS of 21-49%, after propensity score-matching, the median overall survival was not reached for the single-therapy group, but was 9.0 months for the dual-therapy group (p=0.04), whilst corresponding median progression-free survival was 8.3 and 4.1 months (p=0.087).
Conclusion: The results of this study suggest that in patients with NSCLC, the optimal treatment regimen may differ between those with PD-L1 TPS of 1-20% and 21-49%; moreover, nivolumab and ipilimumab-based therapy may be more effective than chemotherapy with a single-agent ICI for treating advanced NSCLC with ultra-low PD-L1 expression, particularly in those with a PD-L1 TPS of 1-20%.
期刊介绍:
ANTICANCER RESEARCH is an independent international peer-reviewed journal devoted to the rapid publication of high quality original articles and reviews on all aspects of experimental and clinical oncology. Prompt evaluation of all submitted articles in confidence and rapid publication within 1-2 months of acceptance are guaranteed.
ANTICANCER RESEARCH was established in 1981 and is published monthly (bimonthly until the end of 2008). Each annual volume contains twelve issues and index. Each issue may be divided into three parts (A: Reviews, B: Experimental studies, and C: Clinical and Epidemiological studies).
Special issues, presenting the proceedings of meetings or groups of papers on topics of significant progress, will also be included in each volume. There is no limitation to the number of pages per issue.