随机、双盲、III期leap003研究:一线Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab与安慰剂+ Pembrolizumab治疗不可切除或转移性黑色素瘤

IF 65.4 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
A Arance, M-A Berciano-Guerrero, J Guo, M S Carlino, P A Ascierto, M Burotto, L Mortier, P Queirolo, V Chiarion-Sileni, J Schachter, X Zhang, J Martin-Liberal, M Del Vecchio, C E Okpara, C Dutcus, J Zhang, S J Diede, T Neff, G V Long
{"title":"随机、双盲、III期leap003研究:一线Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab与安慰剂+ Pembrolizumab治疗不可切除或转移性黑色素瘤","authors":"A Arance, M-A Berciano-Guerrero, J Guo, M S Carlino, P A Ascierto, M Burotto, L Mortier, P Queirolo, V Chiarion-Sileni, J Schachter, X Zhang, J Martin-Liberal, M Del Vecchio, C E Okpara, C Dutcus, J Zhang, S J Diede, T Neff, G V Long","doi":"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced melanoma after prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in LEAP-004. Here, we report results from LEAP-003 (NCT03820986) which evaluated first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in unresectable advanced melanoma.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Participants with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, previously untreated with PD-1 or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks plus either lenvatinib 20 mg or placebo orally once daily. Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and overall survival (OS). PFS was formally tested at the first interim analysis; OS at the final analysis. An external data monitoring committee regularly reviewed safety and efficacy. Three interim analyses and a final analysis were planned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 674 participants were assigned to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n = 334) or placebo plus pembrolizumab (n = 340). Median PFS at first interim analysis was 8.4 months for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 4.0 months for placebo plus pembrolizumab (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = 0.0008). This benefit was not maintained at final analysis (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00). Median OS at final analysis was 25.8 months for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 39.5 months for placebo plus pembrolizumab (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.97-1.48; P = 0.9521). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.7% of participants receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 29.0% receiving placebo plus pembrolizumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not provide additional benefit versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in participants with unresectable advanced melanoma. Thus, the trial was terminated early, and the third interim analysis became the final analysis. Immunotherapy remains the standard of care for advanced melanoma.</p>","PeriodicalId":8000,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":65.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III LEAP-003 Study of First-Line Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab for Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma.\",\"authors\":\"A Arance, M-A Berciano-Guerrero, J Guo, M S Carlino, P A Ascierto, M Burotto, L Mortier, P Queirolo, V Chiarion-Sileni, J Schachter, X Zhang, J Martin-Liberal, M Del Vecchio, C E Okpara, C Dutcus, J Zhang, S J Diede, T Neff, G V Long\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced melanoma after prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in LEAP-004. Here, we report results from LEAP-003 (NCT03820986) which evaluated first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in unresectable advanced melanoma.</p><p><strong>Participants and methods: </strong>Participants with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, previously untreated with PD-1 or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks plus either lenvatinib 20 mg or placebo orally once daily. Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and overall survival (OS). PFS was formally tested at the first interim analysis; OS at the final analysis. An external data monitoring committee regularly reviewed safety and efficacy. Three interim analyses and a final analysis were planned.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall, 674 participants were assigned to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n = 334) or placebo plus pembrolizumab (n = 340). Median PFS at first interim analysis was 8.4 months for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 4.0 months for placebo plus pembrolizumab (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = 0.0008). This benefit was not maintained at final analysis (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00). Median OS at final analysis was 25.8 months for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 39.5 months for placebo plus pembrolizumab (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.97-1.48; P = 0.9521). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.7% of participants receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 29.0% receiving placebo plus pembrolizumab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not provide additional benefit versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in participants with unresectable advanced melanoma. Thus, the trial was terminated early, and the third interim analysis became the final analysis. Immunotherapy remains the standard of care for advanced melanoma.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":65.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.008\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annonc.2025.08.008","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:Lenvatinib + pembrolizumab在LEAP-004中先前抗pd -(L)1治疗后显示出对晚期黑色素瘤的抗肿瘤活性。在此,我们报告了jump -003 (NCT03820986)的结果,该结果评估了一线lenvatinib + pembrolizumab与安慰剂+ pembrolizumab在不可切除的晚期黑色素瘤中的疗效。参与者和方法:不可切除的III期或IV期黑色素瘤患者,既往未接受PD-1或PD-L1检查点抑制剂治疗,随机按1:1分配,每3周静脉注射派姆单抗200mg,加lenvatinib 20mg或安慰剂,每日口服一次。双主要终点是盲法独立中心评价的RECIST v1.1无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。在第一次中期分析中对PFS进行了正式测试;OS在最后的分析。一个外部数据监测委员会定期审查安全性和有效性。计划进行三次中期分析和最后分析。结果:总体而言,674名参与者被分配到lenvatinib + pembrolizumab (n = 334)或安慰剂+ pembrolizumab (n = 340)。首次中期分析时,lenvatinib + pembrolizumab的中位PFS为8.4个月,而安慰剂+ pembrolizumab的中位PFS为4.0个月(HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = 0.0008)。在最终分析中,这一益处没有得到维持(HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00)。最终分析时,lenvatinib + pembrolizumab的中位OS为25.8个月,而安慰剂+ pembrolizumab的中位OS为39.5个月(HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.97-1.48; P = 0.9521)。接受lenvatinib + pembrolizumab治疗的患者发生3-5级治疗相关不良事件的比例为58.7%,而接受安慰剂+ pembrolizumab治疗的患者为29.0%。结论:Lenvatinib + pembrolizumab与安慰剂+ pembrolizumab相比,在不可切除的晚期黑色素瘤患者中没有提供额外的益处。因此,试验提前终止,第三次中期分析成为最终分析。免疫疗法仍然是晚期黑色素瘤的标准治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III LEAP-003 Study of First-Line Lenvatinib Plus Pembrolizumab Versus Placebo Plus Pembrolizumab for Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma.

Background: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab demonstrated antitumor activity in advanced melanoma after prior anti-PD-(L)1 therapy in LEAP-004. Here, we report results from LEAP-003 (NCT03820986) which evaluated first-line lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in unresectable advanced melanoma.

Participants and methods: Participants with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma, previously untreated with PD-1 or PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors, were randomly assigned 1:1 to pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks plus either lenvatinib 20 mg or placebo orally once daily. Dual primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review and overall survival (OS). PFS was formally tested at the first interim analysis; OS at the final analysis. An external data monitoring committee regularly reviewed safety and efficacy. Three interim analyses and a final analysis were planned.

Results: Overall, 674 participants were assigned to lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n = 334) or placebo plus pembrolizumab (n = 340). Median PFS at first interim analysis was 8.4 months for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 4.0 months for placebo plus pembrolizumab (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59-0.88; P = 0.0008). This benefit was not maintained at final analysis (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.69-1.00). Median OS at final analysis was 25.8 months for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 39.5 months for placebo plus pembrolizumab (HR, 1.20; 95% CI, 0.97-1.48; P = 0.9521). Grade 3-5 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 58.7% of participants receiving lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab versus 29.0% receiving placebo plus pembrolizumab.

Conclusion: Lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab did not provide additional benefit versus placebo plus pembrolizumab in participants with unresectable advanced melanoma. Thus, the trial was terminated early, and the third interim analysis became the final analysis. Immunotherapy remains the standard of care for advanced melanoma.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Oncology
Annals of Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
63.90
自引率
1.00%
发文量
3712
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Oncology, the official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology and the Japanese Society of Medical Oncology, offers rapid and efficient peer-reviewed publications on innovative cancer treatments and translational research in oncology and precision medicine. The journal primarily focuses on areas such as systemic anticancer therapy, with a specific emphasis on molecular targeted agents and new immune therapies. We also welcome randomized trials, including negative results, as well as top-level guidelines. Additionally, we encourage submissions in emerging fields that are crucial to personalized medicine, such as molecular pathology, bioinformatics, modern statistics, and biotechnologies. Manuscripts related to radiotherapy, surgery, and pediatrics will be considered if they demonstrate a clear interaction with any of the aforementioned fields or if they present groundbreaking findings. Our international editorial board comprises renowned experts who are leaders in their respective fields. Through Annals of Oncology, we strive to provide the most effective communication on the dynamic and ever-evolving global oncology landscape.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信