Komson Wannasai, Anthony R Russo, Stuti G Shroff, Jonathan N Glickman, Anthony Mattia, M Lisa Zhang, Maria L Ganci, Anna Rider, Fernandez-Del Castillo Carlos, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Angela R Shih
{"title":"新辅助后惠普尔切除在大体确定的肿瘤床外显示明显的显微残留肿瘤:对准确肿瘤分期的影响。","authors":"Komson Wannasai, Anthony R Russo, Stuti G Shroff, Jonathan N Glickman, Anthony Mattia, M Lisa Zhang, Maria L Ganci, Anna Rider, Fernandez-Del Castillo Carlos, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Angela R Shih","doi":"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but treatment effect complicates pathologic examination of postneoadjuvant Whipple resections. Institutional practice is variable but current Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society (PBPS) guidelines suggest extensive microscopic examination of the tumor bed (TB). In practice, gross identification of TB is challenging and may lead to an inaccurate assessment of tumor size. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the adequacy of current practice in postneoadjuvant Whipple resections for pathologic staging. A single institutional prospective cohort was assessed, including 29 entirely submitted (ES) specimens and 10 current PBPS guideline-based (CG) specimens. Cases were evaluated for TB gross measurement, TB microscopic tumor, nontumor bed (N-TB) microscopic tumor, overall size assessment by microscopic evaluation, and presence of lymph nodes with metastases. ES and CG specimens showed similar overall residual tumor size measurements under the current PBPS guidelines protocol, but with the entire submission, tumor size increased by an average of 0.5 cm (range: 0.0 to 2.1 cm). Twenty-eight percent had an upstaged ypT due to a significant N-TB tumor. These findings delineate the limitations of gross TB assessment in postneoadjuvant Whipple resections for adequate pathologic staging and appropriate prognostication.</p>","PeriodicalId":7772,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Postneoadjuvant Whipple Resections Show Significant Residual Microscopic Tumor Beyond Grossly Identified Tumor Bed: Implications for Accurate Tumor Staging.\",\"authors\":\"Komson Wannasai, Anthony R Russo, Stuti G Shroff, Jonathan N Glickman, Anthony Mattia, M Lisa Zhang, Maria L Ganci, Anna Rider, Fernandez-Del Castillo Carlos, Mari Mino-Kenudson, Angela R Shih\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/PAS.0000000000002465\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but treatment effect complicates pathologic examination of postneoadjuvant Whipple resections. Institutional practice is variable but current Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society (PBPS) guidelines suggest extensive microscopic examination of the tumor bed (TB). In practice, gross identification of TB is challenging and may lead to an inaccurate assessment of tumor size. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the adequacy of current practice in postneoadjuvant Whipple resections for pathologic staging. A single institutional prospective cohort was assessed, including 29 entirely submitted (ES) specimens and 10 current PBPS guideline-based (CG) specimens. Cases were evaluated for TB gross measurement, TB microscopic tumor, nontumor bed (N-TB) microscopic tumor, overall size assessment by microscopic evaluation, and presence of lymph nodes with metastases. ES and CG specimens showed similar overall residual tumor size measurements under the current PBPS guidelines protocol, but with the entire submission, tumor size increased by an average of 0.5 cm (range: 0.0 to 2.1 cm). Twenty-eight percent had an upstaged ypT due to a significant N-TB tumor. These findings delineate the limitations of gross TB assessment in postneoadjuvant Whipple resections for adequate pathologic staging and appropriate prognostication.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7772,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Surgical Pathology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002465\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Surgical Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PAS.0000000000002465","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Postneoadjuvant Whipple Resections Show Significant Residual Microscopic Tumor Beyond Grossly Identified Tumor Bed: Implications for Accurate Tumor Staging.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plays a vital role in the treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), but treatment effect complicates pathologic examination of postneoadjuvant Whipple resections. Institutional practice is variable but current Pancreatobiliary Pathology Society (PBPS) guidelines suggest extensive microscopic examination of the tumor bed (TB). In practice, gross identification of TB is challenging and may lead to an inaccurate assessment of tumor size. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the adequacy of current practice in postneoadjuvant Whipple resections for pathologic staging. A single institutional prospective cohort was assessed, including 29 entirely submitted (ES) specimens and 10 current PBPS guideline-based (CG) specimens. Cases were evaluated for TB gross measurement, TB microscopic tumor, nontumor bed (N-TB) microscopic tumor, overall size assessment by microscopic evaluation, and presence of lymph nodes with metastases. ES and CG specimens showed similar overall residual tumor size measurements under the current PBPS guidelines protocol, but with the entire submission, tumor size increased by an average of 0.5 cm (range: 0.0 to 2.1 cm). Twenty-eight percent had an upstaged ypT due to a significant N-TB tumor. These findings delineate the limitations of gross TB assessment in postneoadjuvant Whipple resections for adequate pathologic staging and appropriate prognostication.
期刊介绍:
The American Journal of Surgical Pathology has achieved worldwide recognition for its outstanding coverage of the state of the art in human surgical pathology. In each monthly issue, experts present original articles, review articles, detailed case reports, and special features, enhanced by superb illustrations. Coverage encompasses technical methods, diagnostic aids, and frozen-section diagnosis, in addition to detailed pathologic studies of a wide range of disease entities.
Official Journal of The Arthur Purdy Stout Society of Surgical Pathologists and The Gastrointestinal Pathology Society.