成人2型糖尿病和超重/肥胖患者的食物选择决策概况和健康结局:聚类分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tianxue Long, Yating Zhang, Yi Wu, Pengbo Xing, Yiyun Zhang, Mingzi Li
{"title":"成人2型糖尿病和超重/肥胖患者的食物选择决策概况和健康结局:聚类分析","authors":"Tianxue Long, Yating Zhang, Yi Wu, Pengbo Xing, Yiyun Zhang, Mingzi Li","doi":"10.1177/08901171251371447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeTo identify food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity based on nutritional health and decision process, and to explore differences in health outcomes among profiles.DesignCross-sectional.SettingPrimary healthcare settings.Subject105 adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity (90.52% retention).MeasuresNutritional health and decision process were assessed through the Food Choice Task, indicated by healthy decision rate and reaction time respectively. Health outcomes included clinical (HbA1C, fasting blood glucose, BMI) and psychological (diabetes management self-efficacy, food choice motives) measures.AnalysisHierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles according to nutritional health and decision process. Welch's ANOVA were used to test their differences in health outcomes.ResultsFive profiles were identified: Cautious (healthy choice + slow reaction, 42.86%), Moderate (moderate healthy choice/reaction time, 28.57%), Well-Habit (healthy choice + fast reaction, 11.43%), Strained (unhealthy choice + slow reaction, 7.62%) and Impulsive (unhealthy choice + fast reaction, 9.52%). The Well-Habit Profile exhibited the best outcomes, including lower BMI, higher self-efficacy and healthier food choice motives. The Cautious Profile showed healthy choices but suboptimal self-efficacy. The Impulsive Profile presented a good self-efficacy, but the highest BMI and inadequate healthy choice motives.ConclusionThis study identified five food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity, providing insights of considering both nutritional health and decision process as food choice features when conducting dietary interventions. Limitation included the small sample size and limited settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251371447"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Food Choice Decision-Making Profiles and Health Outcomes in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight/Obesity: A Cluster Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Tianxue Long, Yating Zhang, Yi Wu, Pengbo Xing, Yiyun Zhang, Mingzi Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/08901171251371447\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>PurposeTo identify food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity based on nutritional health and decision process, and to explore differences in health outcomes among profiles.DesignCross-sectional.SettingPrimary healthcare settings.Subject105 adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity (90.52% retention).MeasuresNutritional health and decision process were assessed through the Food Choice Task, indicated by healthy decision rate and reaction time respectively. Health outcomes included clinical (HbA1C, fasting blood glucose, BMI) and psychological (diabetes management self-efficacy, food choice motives) measures.AnalysisHierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles according to nutritional health and decision process. Welch's ANOVA were used to test their differences in health outcomes.ResultsFive profiles were identified: Cautious (healthy choice + slow reaction, 42.86%), Moderate (moderate healthy choice/reaction time, 28.57%), Well-Habit (healthy choice + fast reaction, 11.43%), Strained (unhealthy choice + slow reaction, 7.62%) and Impulsive (unhealthy choice + fast reaction, 9.52%). The Well-Habit Profile exhibited the best outcomes, including lower BMI, higher self-efficacy and healthier food choice motives. The Cautious Profile showed healthy choices but suboptimal self-efficacy. The Impulsive Profile presented a good self-efficacy, but the highest BMI and inadequate healthy choice motives.ConclusionThis study identified five food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity, providing insights of considering both nutritional health and decision process as food choice features when conducting dietary interventions. Limitation included the small sample size and limited settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7481,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"8901171251371447\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Health Promotion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251371447\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251371447","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的根据营养健康和决策过程,确定成人2型糖尿病和超重/肥胖患者的食物决策特征,并探讨这些特征之间健康结局的差异。SettingPrimary医疗保健设置。受试者105例伴有2型糖尿病和超重/肥胖的成年人(保留率90.52%)。通过食物选择任务评估营养健康和决策过程,分别用健康决策率和反应时间表示。健康结果包括临床指标(糖化血红蛋白、空腹血糖、BMI)和心理指标(糖尿病管理自我效能感、食物选择动机)。分析采用层次聚类分析方法,根据营养健康状况和决策过程进行特征识别。使用Welch的方差分析来检验他们在健康结果上的差异。结果被确定为谨慎型(健康选择+慢反应,占42.86%)、中等型(健康选择/反应时间中等,占28.57%)、习惯型(健康选择+快反应,占11.43%)、紧张型(不健康选择+慢反应,占7.62%)和冲动型(不健康选择+快反应,占9.52%)。良好的习惯表现出最好的结果,包括较低的体重指数,较高的自我效能和更健康的食物选择动机。谨慎型档案显示了健康的选择,但自我效能欠佳。冲动型人格表现出良好的自我效能感,但BMI最高,健康选择动机不足。本研究确定了2型糖尿病和超重/肥胖成人的五种食物决策特征,为在进行饮食干预时将营养健康和决策过程作为食物选择特征提供了见解。局限性包括样本量小和设置有限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Food Choice Decision-Making Profiles and Health Outcomes in Adults With Type 2 Diabetes and Overweight/Obesity: A Cluster Analysis.

PurposeTo identify food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity based on nutritional health and decision process, and to explore differences in health outcomes among profiles.DesignCross-sectional.SettingPrimary healthcare settings.Subject105 adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity (90.52% retention).MeasuresNutritional health and decision process were assessed through the Food Choice Task, indicated by healthy decision rate and reaction time respectively. Health outcomes included clinical (HbA1C, fasting blood glucose, BMI) and psychological (diabetes management self-efficacy, food choice motives) measures.AnalysisHierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify profiles according to nutritional health and decision process. Welch's ANOVA were used to test their differences in health outcomes.ResultsFive profiles were identified: Cautious (healthy choice + slow reaction, 42.86%), Moderate (moderate healthy choice/reaction time, 28.57%), Well-Habit (healthy choice + fast reaction, 11.43%), Strained (unhealthy choice + slow reaction, 7.62%) and Impulsive (unhealthy choice + fast reaction, 9.52%). The Well-Habit Profile exhibited the best outcomes, including lower BMI, higher self-efficacy and healthier food choice motives. The Cautious Profile showed healthy choices but suboptimal self-efficacy. The Impulsive Profile presented a good self-efficacy, but the highest BMI and inadequate healthy choice motives.ConclusionThis study identified five food decision-making profiles for adults with T2DM and overweight/obesity, providing insights of considering both nutritional health and decision process as food choice features when conducting dietary interventions. Limitation included the small sample size and limited settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信