特征水平定量超声与CT信息融合预测头颈部肿瘤放疗预后:增强主成分分析

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Medical physics Pub Date : 2025-09-03 DOI:10.1002/mp.18078
Amir Moslemi, Aryan Safakish, Lakshmanan Sannachi, David Alberico, Gregory J. Czarnota
{"title":"特征水平定量超声与CT信息融合预测头颈部肿瘤放疗预后:增强主成分分析","authors":"Amir Moslemi,&nbsp;Aryan Safakish,&nbsp;Lakshmanan Sannachi,&nbsp;David Alberico,&nbsp;Gregory J. Czarnota","doi":"10.1002/mp.18078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Radiation therapy is a common treatment for head and neck (H&amp;N) cancers. Radiomic features, which are determined from biomedical imaging, can be effective biomarkers used to assess tumor heterogeneity and have been used to predict response to treatment. However, most studies employ only a single biomedical imaging modality to determine radiomic features.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomic feature fusion, combining quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy (QUS) and computed tomography (CT) imaging modalities, in predicting the outcomes of radiation therapy for H&amp;N cancer prior to start.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>An enhanced version of principal component analysis (EPCA) was proposed to fuse 70 radiomic features from CT and 476 radiomic features from QUS in order to predict the response to radiation therapy in patients with H&amp;N cancers (partial response vs. complete response). EPCA is a PCA method with Hessian matrix regularization and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n <mo>−</mo>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1 - 2}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> -regularization, and was proposed here for information fusion at a feature level. Leave-one-patient-out methodology with bootstrap was applied to conduct train-test analysis and fused features were used to train two (support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)) classifiers to build a predictive model in order to predict response to treatment for patients with H&amp;N cancers. Five-fold (5) cross validation was applied on the training set to tune the hyperparameters of SVM and KNN classifiers. Consequently, the performance of classifiers was evaluated by examining accuracy (ACC), F1-score (F1), balanced accuracy (BACC), Sensitivity (S<sub>n</sub>), and Specificity (<i>S</i><sub>p</sub>) metrics. Additionally, a two-sided <i>t</i>-test was applied to the top principal components derived from EPCA methodology in order to assess the statistical significance of the selected components. The proposed method developed here was compared with minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature selection, conventional PCA, kernel PCA, autoencoder, and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). Additionally, we compared proposed EPCA with robust PCA and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventy-one (<i>n</i> = 71) (66 male (93%) and female (7chmch%)) H&amp;N cancer patients were recruited with bulky metastatic neck lymph node (LN) involvement. Patients had a mean age of 59 ± 10 and 25 (35.2%) were complete responders and 46 (64.8%) were partial-responders. In terms of predicting responses, the EPCA-SVM classifier had better performance than EPCA-KNN, and achieved 79<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>±</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2% sensitivity, 84<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>±</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2% specificity, 82 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <annotation>$ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math>2% accuracy, 81<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mo>±</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$\\ \\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 2% balanced accuracy, and 82 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>±</mo>\n <mspace></mspace>\n <mn>2</mn>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$ \\pm \\ 2$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>% area under curve (AUC). Results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method with superiority over mRMR feature selection, conventional PCA, kernel PCA, autoencoder, and CCA methods. Using an ablation study, EPCA was compared with robust PCA and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA. Results supported the superiority of EPCA over rPCA and <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <msub>\n <mi>l</mi>\n <mrow>\n <mn>2</mn>\n <mo>,</mo>\n <mn>1</mn>\n </mrow>\n </msub>\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1}}$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA. Three principal components were statistically significant. Additionally, we compared the proposed method with the use of QUS and CT as individual imaging modalities. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of feature-level fusion in enhancing prediction accuracy.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results demonstrated that the proposed predictive model is able to predict a binary H&amp;N cancer treatment outcome, feature level fusion of CT and QUS radiomics has superiority over single imaging modality and EPCA is an effective approach to fuse the features.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":18384,"journal":{"name":"Medical physics","volume":"52 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.18078","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Feature level quantitative ultrasound and CT information fusion to predict the outcome of head & neck cancer radiotherapy treatment: Enhanced principal component analysis\",\"authors\":\"Amir Moslemi,&nbsp;Aryan Safakish,&nbsp;Lakshmanan Sannachi,&nbsp;David Alberico,&nbsp;Gregory J. Czarnota\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mp.18078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Radiation therapy is a common treatment for head and neck (H&amp;N) cancers. Radiomic features, which are determined from biomedical imaging, can be effective biomarkers used to assess tumor heterogeneity and have been used to predict response to treatment. However, most studies employ only a single biomedical imaging modality to determine radiomic features.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomic feature fusion, combining quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy (QUS) and computed tomography (CT) imaging modalities, in predicting the outcomes of radiation therapy for H&amp;N cancer prior to start.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>An enhanced version of principal component analysis (EPCA) was proposed to fuse 70 radiomic features from CT and 476 radiomic features from QUS in order to predict the response to radiation therapy in patients with H&amp;N cancers (partial response vs. complete response). EPCA is a PCA method with Hessian matrix regularization and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n <mo>−</mo>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1 - 2}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> -regularization, and was proposed here for information fusion at a feature level. Leave-one-patient-out methodology with bootstrap was applied to conduct train-test analysis and fused features were used to train two (support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)) classifiers to build a predictive model in order to predict response to treatment for patients with H&amp;N cancers. Five-fold (5) cross validation was applied on the training set to tune the hyperparameters of SVM and KNN classifiers. Consequently, the performance of classifiers was evaluated by examining accuracy (ACC), F1-score (F1), balanced accuracy (BACC), Sensitivity (S<sub>n</sub>), and Specificity (<i>S</i><sub>p</sub>) metrics. Additionally, a two-sided <i>t</i>-test was applied to the top principal components derived from EPCA methodology in order to assess the statistical significance of the selected components. The proposed method developed here was compared with minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature selection, conventional PCA, kernel PCA, autoencoder, and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). Additionally, we compared proposed EPCA with robust PCA and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Seventy-one (<i>n</i> = 71) (66 male (93%) and female (7chmch%)) H&amp;N cancer patients were recruited with bulky metastatic neck lymph node (LN) involvement. Patients had a mean age of 59 ± 10 and 25 (35.2%) were complete responders and 46 (64.8%) were partial-responders. In terms of predicting responses, the EPCA-SVM classifier had better performance than EPCA-KNN, and achieved 79<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\ \\\\pm $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>2% sensitivity, 84<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\ \\\\pm $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>2% specificity, 82 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <annotation>$ \\\\pm $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>2% accuracy, 81<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$\\\\ \\\\pm $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 2% balanced accuracy, and 82 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n <mspace></mspace>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$ \\\\pm \\\\ 2$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>% area under curve (AUC). Results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method with superiority over mRMR feature selection, conventional PCA, kernel PCA, autoencoder, and CCA methods. Using an ablation study, EPCA was compared with robust PCA and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA. Results supported the superiority of EPCA over rPCA and <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <msub>\\n <mi>l</mi>\\n <mrow>\\n <mn>2</mn>\\n <mo>,</mo>\\n <mn>1</mn>\\n </mrow>\\n </msub>\\n <annotation>${{l}_{2,1}}$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA. Three principal components were statistically significant. Additionally, we compared the proposed method with the use of QUS and CT as individual imaging modalities. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of feature-level fusion in enhancing prediction accuracy.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results demonstrated that the proposed predictive model is able to predict a binary H&amp;N cancer treatment outcome, feature level fusion of CT and QUS radiomics has superiority over single imaging modality and EPCA is an effective approach to fuse the features.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical physics\",\"volume\":\"52 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/mp.18078\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://aapm.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mp.18078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

放射治疗是头颈部(H&amp;N)癌症的常用治疗方法。放射学特征是由生物医学成像确定的,可以作为评估肿瘤异质性的有效生物标志物,并用于预测对治疗的反应。然而,大多数研究仅采用单一的生物医学成像方式来确定放射学特征。目的本研究的目的是评估放射学特征融合,结合定量超声光谱(QUS)和计算机断层扫描(CT)成像方式,在开始前预测H&amp;N癌放射治疗结果的有效性。方法采用增强版主成分分析(EPCA),融合CT的70个放射学特征和QUS的476个放射学特征,以预测H&amp;N癌患者对放射治疗的反应(部分缓解vs完全缓解)。EPCA是一种采用Hessian矩阵正则化和1,1,1−2 ${{l}_{2,1 - 2}}$ -正则化的PCA方法。在特征级上进行信息融合。采用带bootstrap的留一患者方法进行训练检验分析,并利用融合特征训练两个(支持向量机(SVM)和k近邻(KNN))分类器,构建预测模型,预测H&amp;N癌症患者的治疗反应。在训练集上应用五重交叉验证来调整SVM和KNN分类器的超参数。因此,通过检查准确性(ACC)、F1评分(F1)、平衡准确性(BACC)、敏感性(Sn)和特异性(Sp)指标来评估分类器的性能。此外,为了评估所选成分的统计显著性,对EPCA方法得出的顶部主成分进行了双侧t检验。本文提出的方法与最小冗余最大相关性(mRMR)特征选择、传统主成分分析、核主成分分析、自编码器和典型相关分析(CCA)进行了比较。此外,我们还将EPCA与鲁棒PCA和1,1,1 ${{l}_{2,1}}$ -范数约束图拉普拉斯PCA进行了比较。结果共71例(n = 71) H&amp; n癌患者,其中男66例(93%),女66例(7chmch%)。患者平均年龄为59±10岁,完全缓解者为25人(35.2%),部分缓解者为46人(64.8%)。在预测反应方面,EPCA-SVM分类器的性能优于EPCA-KNN,灵敏度为79±$\ \pm $ 2%,特异性为84±$\ \pm $ 2%。82±$\ pm $ 2%精度,81±$\ pm $ 2%平衡精度,曲线下面积(AUC)为82±2 %。结果表明,该方法的有效性优于mRMR特征选择、传统PCA、核PCA、自编码器和CCA方法。 通过消融术研究,将EPCA与鲁棒PCA和1,1,1 ${{l}_{2,1}}$ -范数约束图拉普拉斯PCA进行比较。结果支持EPCA优于rPCA和1,1,1 ${{l}_{2,1}}$ -范数约束图拉普拉斯主成分分析。三个主成分有统计学意义。此外,我们将所提出的方法与QUS和CT作为单独的成像方式进行了比较。结果证明了特征级融合在提高预测精度方面的有效性。结论所建立的预测模型能够预测二元H&amp;N肿瘤的治疗结果,CT与QUS放射组学的特征水平融合优于单一成像模式,EPCA是融合特征的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Feature level quantitative ultrasound and CT information fusion to predict the outcome of head & neck cancer radiotherapy treatment: Enhanced principal component analysis

Feature level quantitative ultrasound and CT information fusion to predict the outcome of head & neck cancer radiotherapy treatment: Enhanced principal component analysis

Feature level quantitative ultrasound and CT information fusion to predict the outcome of head & neck cancer radiotherapy treatment: Enhanced principal component analysis

Feature level quantitative ultrasound and CT information fusion to predict the outcome of head & neck cancer radiotherapy treatment: Enhanced principal component analysis

Background

Radiation therapy is a common treatment for head and neck (H&N) cancers. Radiomic features, which are determined from biomedical imaging, can be effective biomarkers used to assess tumor heterogeneity and have been used to predict response to treatment. However, most studies employ only a single biomedical imaging modality to determine radiomic features.

Purpose

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of radiomic feature fusion, combining quantitative ultrasound spectroscopy (QUS) and computed tomography (CT) imaging modalities, in predicting the outcomes of radiation therapy for H&N cancer prior to start.

Method

An enhanced version of principal component analysis (EPCA) was proposed to fuse 70 radiomic features from CT and 476 radiomic features from QUS in order to predict the response to radiation therapy in patients with H&N cancers (partial response vs. complete response). EPCA is a PCA method with Hessian matrix regularization and l 2 , 1 2 ${{l}_{2,1 - 2}}$ -regularization, and was proposed here for information fusion at a feature level. Leave-one-patient-out methodology with bootstrap was applied to conduct train-test analysis and fused features were used to train two (support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)) classifiers to build a predictive model in order to predict response to treatment for patients with H&N cancers. Five-fold (5) cross validation was applied on the training set to tune the hyperparameters of SVM and KNN classifiers. Consequently, the performance of classifiers was evaluated by examining accuracy (ACC), F1-score (F1), balanced accuracy (BACC), Sensitivity (Sn), and Specificity (Sp) metrics. Additionally, a two-sided t-test was applied to the top principal components derived from EPCA methodology in order to assess the statistical significance of the selected components. The proposed method developed here was compared with minimum redundancy maximum relevance (mRMR) feature selection, conventional PCA, kernel PCA, autoencoder, and canonical correlation analysis (CCA). Additionally, we compared proposed EPCA with robust PCA and l 2 , 1 ${{l}_{2,1}}$ -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA.

Results

Seventy-one (n = 71) (66 male (93%) and female (7chmch%)) H&N cancer patients were recruited with bulky metastatic neck lymph node (LN) involvement. Patients had a mean age of 59 ± 10 and 25 (35.2%) were complete responders and 46 (64.8%) were partial-responders. In terms of predicting responses, the EPCA-SVM classifier had better performance than EPCA-KNN, and achieved 79 ± $\ \pm $ 2% sensitivity, 84 ± $\ \pm $ 2% specificity, 82 ± $ \pm $ 2% accuracy, 81 ± $\ \pm $ 2% balanced accuracy, and 82 ± 2 $ \pm \ 2$ % area under curve (AUC). Results demonstrated the effectiveness of the proposed method with superiority over mRMR feature selection, conventional PCA, kernel PCA, autoencoder, and CCA methods. Using an ablation study, EPCA was compared with robust PCA and l 2 , 1 ${{l}_{2,1}}$ -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA. Results supported the superiority of EPCA over rPCA and l 2 , 1 ${{l}_{2,1}}$ -norm constrained graph Laplacian PCA. Three principal components were statistically significant. Additionally, we compared the proposed method with the use of QUS and CT as individual imaging modalities. The results demonstrated the effectiveness of feature-level fusion in enhancing prediction accuracy.

Conclusion

The results demonstrated that the proposed predictive model is able to predict a binary H&N cancer treatment outcome, feature level fusion of CT and QUS radiomics has superiority over single imaging modality and EPCA is an effective approach to fuse the features.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical physics
Medical physics 医学-核医学
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
660
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Medical Physics publishes original, high impact physics, imaging science, and engineering research that advances patient diagnosis and therapy through contributions in 1) Basic science developments with high potential for clinical translation 2) Clinical applications of cutting edge engineering and physics innovations 3) Broadly applicable and innovative clinical physics developments Medical Physics is a journal of global scope and reach. By publishing in Medical Physics your research will reach an international, multidisciplinary audience including practicing medical physicists as well as physics- and engineering based translational scientists. We work closely with authors of promising articles to improve their quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信